IMR Press / JOMH / Volume 15 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.22374/jomh.v15i4.183

Journal of Men’s Health (JOMH) is published by IMR Press from Volume 17 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Dougmar Publishing Group.

Original Research

EFFECT OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION ON EXERCISE-INDUCED MUSCLE DAMAGE AND FIBROTIC FACTOR: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Show Less
1 Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Sport, Health and Rehabilitation, College of Physical Education, Kookmin University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

J. Mens. Health 2019, 15(4), 18–27; https://doi.org/10.22374/jomh.v15i4.183
Submitted: 10 September 2019 | Accepted: 3 October 2019 | Published: 26 November 2019
Abstract

Background and Objective 

The instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) is a form of mechanical stimulation. This treatment is known to provide an effective way to improve muscle function and attenuate muscle pain. However, limited study showed the effect of the IASTM on acute condition such as exercise-induced muscle damage. This study aimed to examine the effects of IASTM on exercise-induced muscle dam-age and fibrotic factor.

Material and Methods 

Sixteen healthy male college students were randomly assigned to IASTM (n=8) and control (n=8). After performing two sets of 25 eccentric contractions of elbow flexors, IASTM was applied for 8 min immediately and 48 h after exercise. Maximal isometric strength (MIS), muscle soreness, and creatine kinase (CK) activity were measured as indicators of muscle damage. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) levels were assessed as a fibrotic factor.

Results 

The recovery of MIS was faster (control vs. IASTM: 96 h: 60.7% ± 7.9% vs. 89.1% ± 10.4%, P<0.001), and TGF-β1 level was lower (control vs. IASTM: 48 h: 5.5 ± 1.9 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6, P<0.01; 72 h: 5.6 ± 1.7 vs. 2.6 ± 0.5, 96 h: 5.2 ± 1.6 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5 ng/mL, P<0.001) in the IASTM group than in the control group. However, no significant differences in muscle soreness or CK activity were found between groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion 

IASTM may be an effective method for reducing scar tissue and restoring muscle function quickly after exercise-induced muscle damage.

Keywords
eccentric exercise
fibrosis
instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization
muscle damage
transforming growth factor-β1
Share
Back to top