IMR Press / EJGO / Volume 29 / Issue 1 / pii/1630995338861-530827603

European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology (EJGO) is published by IMR Press from Volume 40 Issue 1 (2019). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Open Access Original Research
Cold-knife conization versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for treatment of cervical dysplasia
Show Less
1 Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Centre of Serbia (Serbia)
Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2008, 29(1), 83–85;
Published: 10 February 2008
Abstract

Introduction: Classical conization is a standard procedure for treatment of cervical lesions. Conization with loop diathermy is well established and lesions can be excised in more than 90% of cases. Objective: To compare two methods of conization for the treatment of cervical dysplasia. Method: The study included 172 patients who had conization for diagnosed cervical dysplasia. A retrospective analysis was conducted on incidence of complications and presence of dysplasia on the specimen edges after classical conization compared to conization with loop diathermy. The possibilities for analyzing specimen edges were reviewed. Results: A significantly higher incidence of complications was found among patients who underwent classical conization compared to those who had the loop diathermy procedure. The loop procedure is sufficient for treatment of cervical dysplasias. Conclusion: The authors suggest loop diathermy conization as the method of choice for treatment of cervical dysplasia.
Keywords
Conization
Complications
Resection edges
Leep
Cold-knife
Share
Back to top