IMR Press / RCM / Volume 23 / Issue 7 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2307245
Open Access Original Research
Correlation between Doppler Echocardiography and Right Heart Catheterization Assessment of Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Patients with Mitral Regurgitation: A Prospective Observational Study
Show Less
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
2 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Canter, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany
*Correspondence: ali.haddad@uk-essen.de (Ali Haddad)
Academic Editors: Buddhadeb Dawn and Donato Mele
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 23(7), 245; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2307245
Submitted: 17 March 2022 | Revised: 30 April 2022 | Accepted: 16 May 2022 | Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Echocardiography in Current Cardiology Practice)
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common in patients with left-side valvular diseases, especially with mitral regurgitation (MR). Measurement using pulmonal artery catheter (PAC) is the gold standard to asses pulmonary vascular pressures. During mitral valve surgery echocardiography is routinely used for valvular management and to evaluate pulmonary hemodynamic. The accuracy of echocardiographic measurements is controversial in the literature. We aimed to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the noninvasive measurement for systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) using Doppler echocardiography compared to the invasive measurement using PAC in patients presenting with MR undergoing surgery. Methods: This prospective observational study evaluated 146 patients with MR undergoing cardiac surgery between 09/2020 and 10/2021. All patients underwent simultaneous SPAP assessment by PAC and transesophageal echocardiography at three different time points: before heart-lung-machine (HLM), after weaning from HLM and at the end of surgery. Results: Mean patients’ age was 61 ± 11.5 years, and 51 (35%) patients were female. Most of patients presented with severe MR (n = 126; 86.3%) or endocarditis (n = 18; 12.3%). Patients underwent either isolated mitral valve surgery (n = 65; 44.5%) or mitral valve surgery combined with other surgeries (n = 81; 55.5%). Mean SPAP was underestimated by transesophageal echocardiographic measurement in comparison to PAC measurement before HLM (41.9 ± 13.1 mmHg vs. 44.8 ± 13.8 mmHg, p < 0.001), after weaning from HLM (37.6 ± 9.3 mmHg vs. 42.4 ± 10.1 mmHg, p < 0.001), and at the end of surgery (35.6 ± 9.1 mmHg vs. 39.9 ± 9.9 mmHg, p < 0.001). This difference remained within the sub-analysis in patients presented with moderate or severe PH during all the time points. Bland-Altman analysis showed that transesophageal echocardiographic measurement underestimate SPAP in comparison to PAC as these two approaches are significantly different from one another. Conclusions: In patients presented with MR, transesophageal Doppler echocardiography could asses the presence of PH with high probability. This assessment is however underestimated and the use of PAC in those patients to diagnose, classify and monitor the therapy of PH remains recommended if required.

Keywords
Doppler echocardiography
right-side heart catheterization
pulmonary artery catheter
mitral valve regurgitation
1. Introduction

Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is one of the most frequent heart valve diseases worldwide [1]. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common pathology in patients with left-side valvular diseases [2]. Many studies report increased mortality in patients presenting with PH undergoing mitral valve surgery and considered it to be a marker for a poor outcome after surgery [3, 4]. The assessment of PH is essential for risk stratification, and is one of the components of the EuroSCOREs [5, 6]. According to European-Society of Cardiology/European-Respiratory-Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines, the right heart catheterization (RHC) using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is the gold standard for direct measurement of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) [7]. Accordingly, PH is defined by a mean PAP 25 mmHg [7]. Based on the EuroSCORE II, moderate PH is defined as a systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) of 31 mmHg, and severe PH as SPAP of 55 mmHg [6]. The RHC is an invasive tool and potentially associated with severe complications. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a useful routine clinical tool during cardiac surgery. The noninvasive estimation of SPAP by Doppler echocardiography is widely used in clinical routine [7].

SPAP assessment using echocardiography has been described since more than three decades [8, 9, 10]. For calculation of SPAP, the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) measured by maximal flow velocity of the tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is added to the right atrial pressure (RAP) measured by central venous catheter (CVC) [7, 11, 12]. Ever since, Doppler echocardiography is routinely used to estimate PH within the daily practice. So far, there are just few studies with small sample size which investigated the correlation between SPAP measurement by Doppler echocardiography and invasive measurement using a PAC [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. In some of these studies, the accuracy of echocardiographic SPAP estimation has been questioned [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. Furthermore, to our knowledge the correlation between invasive and noninvasive estimation of pulmonary artery pressure simultaneously in patients with mitral valve regurgitation has not been investigated yet.

Therefore, this study was performed in order to investigate the correlation between simultaneous noninvasive transesophageal Doppler echocardiography and invasive right heart catheter estimation of SPAP in a prospective cohort of patients presenting with MR undergoing cardiac surgery.

2. Material and Methods
2.1 Patient Population and Study Design

The study obtained a review board approval according to the University-Hospital-Ethics-Committee (Ref# 20-9403-BO). The study is a single-center prospective observational one included patients presenting with MR undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement at the University Hospital Essen over a one-year period between 09/2020 and 10/2021. Exclusion criteria were: patients <18 years, those who refused to participate in the study, patients presenting for emergency surgery, and those who could not sign a written consent. In total, 198 patients were primarily included and recorded in our study database. Thereafter, data were screened for eligibility, extracted and then evaluated. However, records of 32 patients did not have a sufficient transesophageal echocardiographic image quality to estimate SPAP, records in another 14 patients did not show TR necessary to estimate SPAP via echocardiography, and in 6 patients PAC insertion into the pulmonary artery was not possible. Finally, data from 146 patients with simultaneous hemodynamic assessment by PAC and transesophageal echocardiography were included in this study as shown within the study flowchart (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Study Flowchart.

2.2 Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Pressure

After induction of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, all 146 patients received central venous catheter and a pulmonary artery catheter via a 8.5 French sheath introducer through a central vein. The SPAP values were measured simultaneously by PAC and transesophageal echocardiography at three different time points: first, after induction of anesthesia and before heart-lung-machine, second, after weaning from the HLM, and finally at the end of surgery and prior transfer to the ICU. In 18 patients, who received concomitant tricuspid valve reconstruction, the PAC was pulled back from the catheter sheath to the central vein after the first measurement and could not be re-introduced to the pulmonary artery after valve repair. Additionally, the echocardiographic evaluation of SPAP could not be done in these 18 patients post valve repair. This in turn allowed a total of 402 measurements of SPAP for all three modalities. PAP measurements were carried out by two different experienced cardiothoracic anesthesiologists of which one was responsible for the transesophageal echocardiography measurements and the other one for the PAC measurements. Both investigators were blinded to the measurements made by the other investigator.

2.3 Pulmonary Artery Catheter

All patients underwent right-side heart catheterization with a PAC. PAC was used to report hemodynamic values including: pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressures (SPAP & DPAP), right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance (SVR & PVR). Mean PAP was calculated with the equation [DPAP + 1/3(SPAP-DPAP)] [21]. Cardiac output (CO) was determined using the thermodilution technique [21]. Stroke volume (SV) was calculated as CO divided by heart rate (HR) [CO/HR]. Indexes of CO, SV, SVR and PVR variables were calculated via dividing each value with the body surface area (BSA) yielding cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI).

2.4 Transesophageal Echocardiography

Standardized transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination was performed in all cases in our institution by experienced cardiothoracic anesthesiologist who was certified by the National Board of Echocardiography. The TEE examination included assessment of all heart valves, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by the Simpson method. Basically, right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) represents the systolic pulmonary artery pressure in absence of pulmonary valve pathology [8]. The echocardiographic RVSP was calculated by adding the trans-tricuspid pressure gradient (TPG) to the measured RAP as represented by the CVP. TPG was calculated by the modified Bernoulli equation, which was drawn by the peak systolic velocity flow across the regurgitating tricuspid valve with the continuous wave Doppler (TPG = 4 X Vmax2) [9]. The modified Bernoullie equation is agnostic to the direction of the blood flow; it merely measures the pressure gradient across a small orifice, the flow through this orifice will depend on the pressure gradient across it.

2.5 Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS-software (version 27.0. IBM Crop., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous data were expressed as means and standard deviation (SD) or medians with the 25th–75th interquartile ranges (IQR), as appropriate, and categorical data were expressed as percentages and frequencies. Differences between the two types of measurements were compared by t-test. All reported p values are two-sided and a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Agreement of measurements was assessed by way of Bland–Altman plots [22]. Finally, Excel 2016 software (version 16.0, Microsoft, Albuquerque, NM, USA) was used to create clustered bars, which show the difference in both approaches in a diagram.

3. Results
3.1 Preoperative Data

The preoperative patient characteristics are described in Table 1. Mean patients’ age was 61 ± 11.5 years, and 51 (35%) patients were male. More than half of the patients (81, 55.5%) presented with impaired functional capacity (class III or IV) according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification and 15 patients had prior cardiac surgery. Most of the patients (145, 99.3%) presented with moderate to severe MR, 18 patients had active endocarditis, and 18 patients presented with concomitant severe TR. Moderate to severe PH was diagnosed in 114 (78.1%) patients. Additionally, 33 (22.6%) patients presented with concomitant severe aortic valve pathology, another 33 (22.6%) patients had severe coronary artery disease and 10 (6.9%) patients had patent foramen ovale.

Table 1.Baseline characteristics.
Variable Patients (n = 146)
Demographics
Age, years 61 ± 11.5
Gender, male 95 (65)
BMI*, kg/m2 25.8 ± 4.3
Risk factors & comorbidities
Arterial hypertension 106 (72.6)
Diabetes mellitus 36 (24.7)
COPD* 12 (8.2)
Peripheral vascular disease 3 (2.1)
Cerebrovascular disease 14 (9.6)
Preoperative creatinine level, mg/dL 1.1 ± 0.7
Preoperative impaired kidney function 14 (9.6)
Atrial fibrillation 34 (23.3)
Anticoagulation (OAK*s or NOAK*s) 47 (32.2)
NYHA* III-IV 81 (55.5)
Prior cardiac surgery 15 (10.3)
Mitral valve pathology
Mild regurgitation 1 (0.7)
Moderate regurgitation 19 (13.0)
Severe regurgitation 126 (86.3)
Endocarditis 18 (12.3)
Tricuspid valve pathology
Mild regurgitation 78 (53.4)
Moderate regurgitation 50 (34.2)
Severe regurgitation 18 (12.3)
Other cardiac pathologies
Severe aortic valve pathology 33 (22.6)
Severe coronary artery disease 33 (22.6)
Patent foramen ovale 10 (6.9)
Presence and severity of pulmonary hypertension
None (SPAP* 0–30 mmHg) 32 (21.9)
Moderate (SPAP 31–55 mmHg) 87 (59.6)
Severe (SPAP >55 mmHg) 27 (18.5)
Operation risk scores
Logistic EuroSCORE* 3.3 (2–7.5)
EuroSCORE II 1.7 (0.8–2.6)
STSROM* 0.7 (0.4–1.8)
STSROMM* 7.3 (5.1–13)
Data are presented as mean ± SD, number (%) or median (interquartile range). BMI, Body mass index; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NYHA, New York Heart Association functional classification; SPAP, Systolic pulmonary artery pressure; EuroSCORE, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation. STSROM/M, Society of Thoracic Surgery Risk of Mortality and/or Morbidity.
3.2 Echocardiographic and Hemodynamic Data

Table 2 summarizes echocardiographic characters and the hemodynamic data prior to HLM. Mean left ventricular ejection function was 54 ± 10%, and 32 (21.9%) patients presented with impaired LVEF (<50%). The mean effective regurgitation orifice area of the diseased mitral valves was 0.6 ± 0.2 cm2 and the mean size of the vena contracta was 7.1 ± 1.2 mm. PAC was used to evaluate the hemodynamics prior to HLM; mean SPAS was 44.8 ± 13.8 mmHg, mean CVP was 11.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, mean cardiac output was 3.5 ± 1.2 L/min, median wedge pressure was 14 mmHg, and the mean systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) was 3109.2 ± 1223.3 (WU.m2), and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) was 557.5 ± 341.1 (WU.m2).

Table 2.Preoperative echocardiographic and hemodynamic data.
Variable Patients (n = 146)
Echocardiographic data
E/A ratio 2.4 ± 1.1
Deceleration time, ms 235.8 ± 112.5
E´ septal, cm/s 7.5 ± 2.7
E´ lateral, cm/s 8.6 ± 3.1
E/E´ ratio 13.6 ± 7.0
Vena contracta, mm 7.1 ± 1.2
EROA*, cm2 0.6 ± 0.2
Mean left ventricular ejection fraction, (%) 54 ± 10
Impaired left ventricular function (LVEF* <50%) 32 (21.9)
sPAP*, mmHg 41.9 ± 13.1
Hemodynamic data using PAC*
sPAP*, mmHg 44.8 ± 13.8
dPAP, mmHg 20.1 ± 7.9
mPAP, mmHg 29.3 ± 9.7
CVP*, mmHg 11.9 ± 7.2
Wedge pressure, mmHg 14 (9–17)
Heart rate, beat/min 62 ± 15
Cardiac output, L/min 3.5 ± 1.2
Cardiac index, L/min/m2 1.7 ± 0.5
SVRI*, WU.m2 3109.2 ± 1223.3
PVRI*, WU.m2 557.5 ± 341.1
Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). EROA, Effective regurgitation orifice area; PAC, Pulmonary artery catheter; sPAP, Systolic pulmonary artery pressure; dPAP, diastolic pulmonary artery pressure; mPAP, Mean pulmonary artery pressure; CVP, Central venous pressure; SVRI, Systemic vascular resistance index; PVRI, Pulmonary vascular resistance index.
3.3 Correlation between Noninvasive and Invasive Estimation of SPAP

Table 3 summarizes correlation between noninvasive and invasive estimation of SPAP. Mean SPAP showed a significant underestimation of echocardiographic measurements in comparison to PAC measurements before HLM (41.9 ± 13.1 vs. 44.8 ± 13.8, p < 0.001), after weaning from HLM (37.6 ± 9.3 vs. 42.4 ± 10.1, p < 0.001), and at the end of surgery (35.6 ± 9.1 vs. 39.9 ± 9.9, p < 0.001). This difference remained in the sub-analysis in patients presented with moderate or severe PH during all the three time points of assessment as reported in Table 4. Bland-Altman analysis showed that these two approaches are significantly different from one another (Fig. 2A,B,C). Finally, Fig. 3 illustrate the difference between both measurements in diagrammatic clustered bars.

Table 3.Differences between PAP measurement using echocardiographic and PAC.
Severity Time of measurement SPAP* with PAC SPAP* with TEE p-value
Mean value for all patients, mmHg
Before HLM* 44.8 ± 13.8 41.9 ± 13.1 <0.001
After weaning from HLM 42.4 ± 10.1 37.6 ± 9.3 <0.001
At the end of surgery 39.9 ± 9.9 35.6 ± 9.1 <0.001
No PAH* (sPAP* 0–30 mmHg)
Before HLM 27.2 ± 2.2 26.7 ± 5.3 0.598
After weaning from HLM 35.1 ± 7.8 32.1 ± 6.8 0.003
At the end of surgery 35 ± 8.7 31.6 ± 8.2 0.001
Moderate PAH (sPAP* 31–55 mmHg)
Before HLM 43.3 ± 7 40.9 ± 7.6 <0.001
After weaning from HLM 44.2 ± 9.8 38.5 ± 9.3 <0.001
At the end of surgery 40.7 ± 9.6 35.9 ± 8.6 <0.001
Severe PAH (sPAP* >55 mmHg)
Before HLM 66.1 ± 7.5 59.1 ± 12.4 0.004
After weaning from HLM 45.7 ± 10 42.1 ± 9.3 0.001
At the end of surgery 44.5 ± 10.3 41.2 ± 9.6 0.006
Data are presented as mean ± SD. PAH, Pulmonary arterial hypertension; HLM, Heart-lung-machine; SPAP, Systolic pulmonary artery pressure; PAC, Pulmonary artery catheter; TEE, Transesophageal echocardiography.
Table 4.Operative and early postoperative outcomes.
Variable Patients (n = 146)
Indication for surgery
Elective 128 (87.7)
Urgent (endocarditis) 18 (12.3)
Surgical outcomes
Minimal invasive 28 (19.2)
Conventional procedure 118 (80.8)
Mitral valve repair 120 (82.2)
Mitral valve replacement 26 (17.8)
Isolated mitral valve surgery 65 (44.5)
Combined mitral valve surgery 81 (55.5)
Combined with aortic valve replacement 33 (22.6)
Combined with tricuspid valve repair 18 (12.3)
Combined with CABG* 33 (22.6)
PFO* closure 10 (6.8)
More than two procedures 39 (26.7)
Intraoperative use of NO* or Iloprost®
Only Iloprost® 39 (26.7)
NO* and Iloprost® 10 (6.9)
Postoperative outcomes
ICU*- stay, days 2 (2–6.5)
Hospital- stay, days 12 ± 5.8
30-day mortality 14 (9.6)
Data are presented as mean ± SD, number (%) or median (interquartile range). CABG, Coronary artery bypass grafting; PFO, Patent foramen ovale; NO, Nitrous Oxide; ICU, Intensive care unit.
Fig. 2.

Bland-altman plots assessing the correlation between systolic pulmonary artery pressure measured either invasively by pulmonary artery catheter or noninvasively by doppler echocardiography. (A) Before HLM. (B) After HLM. (C) At the end of surgery.

Fig. 3.

Clustered bars showing different SPAP measurements using pulmonary artery catheter and Doppler echocardiography.

3.4 Operative and Postoperative Outcomes

Table 4 reports perioperative outcomes. Patients presented with active endocarditis underwent urgent surgery 18 (12.3%). Minimal invasive surgery was performed in 28 (19.2%) patients. Most of the patients 120 (82.2%) underwent mitral valve repair. More than half of the patients 81 (55.5%) underwent concomitant procedure: tricuspid valve repair in 18 (12.3%) patients, aortic valve replacement in 33 (22.6%) and coronary artery bypass grafting in 33 (22.6%) and PFO closure in 10 (6.9%) patients. Of these, 39 (26.7%) patients underwent more than two procedures. Patient with severe PH received intraoperative prostacyclin analogues (Iloprost®) alone in 39 (26.7%) or combined with nitrous oxide in 10 (6.9%) patients. Finally, median ICU-stay was two days, and 30-day mortality was reported in 14 (9.6%) patients.

4. Discussion

So far, only few studies have been performed to evaluate the correlation between simultaneous noninvasive estimation of SPAP by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography and invasive measurement of SPAP via right-side heart catheterization. Most of these studies have investigated nonhomogeneous groups of patients that presented with different cardiac pathologies, which in turn might impact outcomes. Therefore, we decided to perform a prospective study to analyze this correlation in a cohort of patients presenting with MR undergoing surgery, where SPAP was measured simultaneously using Doppler echocardiography and PAC from two different experienced cardiothoracic anesthesiologists, additionally SPAP measurements were done at three different time points perioperatively.

In 146 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery due to mitral regurgitation, SPAP has been measured 402 times with each modality via PAC and Doppler echocardiography simultaneously before and after HLM, and at the end of surgery. The main findings in our study are: (1) Doppler echocardiography is a routinely used, noninvasive feasible tool to screen patients with pulmonary hypertension. (2) Echocardiography in patients with mitral valve regurgitation underestimates the SPAP in comparison to right-side heart catheterization. The reported difference is significant between both modalities, regardless the presence of PH. (3) Bland-Altman analysis proved that measurement by echocardiography underestimate the measurement made by PAC as these two measurements are significantly different from each another and cannot provide a useful level of agreement.

Earlier studies have reported that the invasive measurement of pulmonary artery pressure using right-side heart catheterization via PAC to be the gold standard manner for the diagnosis of PH [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. This approach is associated with an in-hospital mortality of 0,0055% [12]. Cost-beneficially, it is not practical to insert a PAC in all patients presented for cardiac surgery. Echocardiography is, however, a routine and fundamental in all patients undergoing cardiac surgery, it is frequently used to screen and monitor heart valves and both ventricular function. Based on its non-invasive nature, wide availability and cost effectiveness in comparison to PAC, it could be also used to diagnose and monitor the therapy of severe PH and control its progression over time [7, 11, 23].

To the best of our knowledge, the reliability of Doppler echocardiography to estimate SPAP noninvasively has been assessed in small retrospective studies with controversially results. D’Alto et al. [16] evaluated 161 patients with suspected PH. They reported that echocardiography allows for accurate measurement of PH, however, with moderate precision [16]. In a cohort of 374 lung transplant candidates, 52% of pressure estimations by echocardiography were reported to be inaccurate with more than 10 mmHg difference compared to the measured pressure using PAC [15]. Rich et al. [14] reported in 160 patients with PH a moderate correlation (r = 0.68), where Doppler echocardiography estimation of SPAP were determined to be inaccurate in 50.6% of patients despite sort of simultaneous measurements. Fischer et al. [13] evaluated the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography for estimating pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output in 65 patients within one hour after they received a PAC. Doppler echocardiography was reported inaccurate (defined as being >10 mmHg of the invasive measurement) in 48% of cases. On the other hand, several studies showed a good correlation between the two modalities. For instance, Amsallem et al. [19] examined a population with PH or advanced lung disease and reported a correlation of r = 0.84 and an accuracy of 72% of the Doppler echocardiography. More recently, Schewel et al. [18] reported in their retrospective analyzes of 1400 patients with aortic stenosis a very good correlation between SPAP measurement via PAC and echocardiography performed within five-day interval. Notably, a cut-off value of RVSP >34 mmHg is highly associated with PH [7] according to the ESC/ERS guidelines and a further evaluation of symptomatic patients is recommended if RVSP >40 mmHg according to the ACCF/AHA guidelines [23]. Greiner et al. [20] reported in one of largest cohorts including 1695 cardiac patients that an echocardiographic SPAP cutoff of 36 mmHg has the highest sensitivity (87%) and specificity (79.1%) for PH diagnosis (invasive MPAP 25 mmHg).

In the current prospective observational study, we evaluated the difference between both measurement of pulmonary artery pressure in 146 patients presented with MR. PH is known to be a common pathology in patients with left-side valvular diseases [2]. The majority of patients (n = 120; 82.2%) underwent mitral valve repair with different repair techniques [24]. Valve repair was also possible even in patients presented with valve endocarditis, repair techniques in cases of endocarditis was earlier reported [25]. Mitral valve replacement was only performed when the native valve was not possible to repair. In the primary evaluation using the t-test, a significant difference was reported between the mean values of both measurements at all the three time points (p < 0.001). During sub-analysis of pulmonary artery pressure to define the presence and severity of PH, both modalities show same probability of classification as reported in EuroSCORE II [6]; no PH if SPAP is between 0–30 mmHg, moderate PH if SPAP is between 31–55 mmHg, and severe PH if SPAP exceeds 55 mmHg.

The significant difference between both measurements was repeated in the sub-analysis in patients who presented with moderate or severe PH during all the three stages of assessment. Additionally, Bland-Altman analysis showed that the echocardiographic measurement underestimate the SPAP values in comparison to the PAC measurement as these two measurements are significantly different from one another and do not provide a useful level of agreement. It reported a bias between both measurements of 2.96 mmHg (95% limits of agreement –9.64 to + 15.55 mmHg) before the use of HLM, a bias of 4.80 mmHg (95% limits of agreement –10.18 to + 19.78 mmHg) after weaning from HLM and a bias of 4.23 mmHg (95% limits of agreement –7.58 to + 16.04 mmHg) at the end of surgery. The underestimation of PH in comparison to PAC warn the physicians about the clinical condition of these patient. When severe PH would be diagnosed, patients would require special perioperative (i.e., pre-, intra- and postoperative) RV support and management. This subgroup is of most importance as patients with undiagnosed severe PH could develop several postoperative complications as earlier reported [3, 4]. Hence, in patients presented with MR, Doppler echocardiography could assess the presence of pulmonary hypertension with high probability. This assessment is however underestimated and the use of PAC in those patients to diagnose, classify and monitor the therapy of PH remains recommended if required.

5. Limitation

Our study was performed at a single institution including a relatively small cohort of patients; however, it represents one of the first studies that investigates the difference between invasive and non-invasive SPAP measurement simultaneously in patients presenting with mitral valve regurgitation in a prospective comprehensive manner. Both approaches were performed in intubated and ventilated patients, thereby, the SPAP could have been underestimated in some patients due to anesthesia-induced vasodilation and hypotonia, besides, the fluid status, ventilation and catecholamine doses might have influenced the value of pulmonary artery pressure. Even though, due to the simultaneous measurement process we assume that these factors affects both measurement equally. The main reason for pulmonary artery pressure overestimation is the inability to identify the complete tricuspid regurgitation signal [19], so we excluded all patients without complete TR signal to avoid any overestimation of SPAP obtained by transesophageal echocardiography. Additionally the angel deviation during transesophageal echocardiography could underestimate the maximum jet velocity over the tricuspid valve. Moreover, during cardiac surgery under general anesthesia, the vasodilative effect of anesthetic medication resulted in an underestimated wedge pressure, which could be higher during normal physiological status i.e. awake patients.

6. Conclusions

In patients presented with mitral valve regurgitation, transesophageal Doppler echocardiography is a useful and noninvasive modality for initial measurement of pulmonary artery pressure when comparted to invasive measurement using PAC. These echocardiographic measurements however underestimate significantly the SPAP measurement in comparison to PAC. Hence, right-side heart catheterization using PAC remains precise and should be applied in patients classified with severe PH by echocardiography, whenever to specify the diagnosis, severity, and management of PH is indicated.

Author Contributions

AH, S-ES—Concept, design, data analysis, Statistics, drafting manuscript editing & revision. OT—Data collection. CS, AM—Methodology & resources. MH, MMB, BS, AR, TB—Critical revision & editing. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The present study obtained local IRB-approval (Ref# 20-9403-BO) according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References
[1]
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Levang OW, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. European Heart Journal. 2003; 24: 123–143.
[2]
Fang JC, DeMarco T, Givertz MM, Borlaug BA, Lewis GD, Rame JE, et al. World Health Organization Pulmonary Hypertension Group 2: Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease in the adult—a summary statement from the Pulmonary Hypertension Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2012; 31: 913–933.
[3]
Ghoreishi M, Evans CF, DeFilippi CR, Hobbs G, Young CA, Griffith BP, et al. Pulmonary hypertension adversely affects short- and long-term survival after mitral valve operation for mitral regurgitation: Implications for timing of surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011; 142: 1439–1452.
[4]
Magne J, Lancellotti P, Piérard LA. Exercise Pulmonary Hypertension in Asymptomatic Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation. Circulation. 2010; 122: 33–41.
[5]
Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA. The logistic EuroSCORE. European Heart Journal. 2003; 24: 882–883.
[6]
Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR, et al. EuroSCORE II. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2012; 41: 734–745.
[7]
Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). European Respiratory Journal. 2015; 46: 903–975.
[8]
Yock PG, Popp RL. Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation. 1984; 70: 657–662.
[9]
Berger M, Haimowitz A, Van Tosh A, Berdoff RL, Goldberg E. Quantitative assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with tricuspid regurgitation using continuous wave doppler ultrasound. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1985; 6: 359–365.
[10]
Currie PJ, Seward JB, Chan K, Fyfe DA, Hagler DJ, Mair DD, et al. Continuous wave doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: a simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1985; 6: 750–756.
[11]
Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of the Right Heart in Adults: a Report from the American Society of Echocardiography: endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2010; 23: 685–713.
[12]
Janda S, Shahidi N, Gin K, Swiston J. Diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2011; 97: 612–622.
[13]
Fisher MR, Forfia PR, Chamera E, Housten-Harris T, Champion HC, Girgis RE, et al. Accuracy of Doppler Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2009; 179: 615–621.
[14]
Rich JD, Shah SJ, Swamy RS, Kamp A, Rich S. Inaccuracy of Doppler Echocardiographic Estimates of Pulmonary Artery Pressures in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: Implications for Clinical Practice. Chest. 2011; 139: 988–993.
[15]
Arcasoy SM, Christie JD, Ferrari VA, Sutton MSJ, Zisman DA, Blumenthal NP, et al. Echocardiographic Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Advanced Lung Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2003; 167: 735–740.
[16]
D’Alto M, Romeo E, Argiento P, D’Andrea A, Vanderpool R, Correra A, et al. Accuracy and precision of echocardiography versus right heart catheterization for the assessment of pulmonary hypertension. International Journal of Cardiology. 2013; 168: 4058–4062.
[17]
Farber HW, Foreman AJ, Miller DP, McGoon MD. REVEAL Registry: Correlation of Right Heart Catheterization and Echocardiography in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Congestive Heart Failure. 2011; 17: 56–63.
[18]
Schewel J, Schlüter M, Schmidt T, Kuck K, Frerker C, Schewel D. Correlation between Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization assessment of systolic pulmonary artery pressure in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Echocardiography. 2020; 37: 380–387.
[19]
Amsallem M, Sternbach JM, Adigopula S, Kobayashi Y, Vu TA, Zamanian R, et al. Addressing the Controversy of Estimating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2016; 29: 93–102.
[20]
Greiner S, Jud A, Aurich M, Hess A, Hilbel T, Hardt S, et al. Reliability of Noninvasive Assessment of Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure by Doppler Echocardiography Compared to Right Heart Catheterization: Analysis in a Large Patient Population. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2014; 3: e001103.
[21]
Wiegand DL. AACN Procedure Manual for High Acuity, Progressive, and Critical Care. Elsevier: St Louis. 2017.
[22]
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1999; 8: 135–160.
[23]
McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Farber HW, Lindner JR, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 Expert Consensus Document on Pulmonary Hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association: developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, Inc., and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Circulation. 2009; 119: 2250–2294.
[24]
El Gabry M, Mourad F, Loosen L, Ruhparwar A, Demircioglu E, Wendt D, et al. A new simplified technique for artificial chordae implantation in mitral valve repair with its early results. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2020; 12: 724–732.
[25]
El Gabry M, Haidari Z, Mourad F, Nowak J, Tsagakis K, Thielmann M, et al. Outcomes of mitral valve repair in acute native mitral valve infective endocarditis. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2019; 29: 823–829.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Share
Back to top