IMR Press / RCM / Volume 18 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.3909/ricm0884

Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (RCM) is published by IMR Press from Volume 19 Issue 1 (2018). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with MedReviews, LLC.

Open Access Review
Two Perspectives of the Appropriate Use Criteria in Cardiology Practice: Advantageous and Useful or Limiting and Harmful?
Show Less
1 Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA
2 University of California, Irvine, CA
3 University of California, San Francisco, CA
4 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2017, 18(2), 73–77; https://doi.org/10.3909/ricm0884
Abstract
The appropriate use criteria (AUC) has become an integral part of the cardiologist’s daily practice and have evolved greatly since their inception over a decade ago. However, as health care costs continue to rise, the AUC has come to play an even more pivotal role in the way medicine—specifically cardiology—is practiced today. This editorial describes two opposing viewpoints commonly held by practicing clinicians of the AUC. Written from the perspective of two fellows-in-training looking ahead at the challenges and opportunities of clinical practice (under the auspices of several experienced clinicians and leaders of the American College of Cardiology), this article provides a fresh perspective on the impact AUC has on our patients, clinicians, and the health care system.
Share
Back to top