IMR Press / JOMH / Volume 18 / Issue 7 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1807148
Open Access Original Research
Influence of Upper and Lower Body Anthropometric Measures on An Aggregate Physical Performance Score in Young Elite Male Soccer Players: A Case Study
Show Less
1 Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
2 Nutrition, Hydration & Body Composition Department, Parma Calcio 1913, 43044 Parma, Italy
3 Nutrition Department, Spezia Calcio 1913, 19123 La Spezia, Italy
4 Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
5 Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Obesity Unit and Laboratory of Nutrition and Obesity Research, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, 20095 Milan, Italy
*Correspondence: (Athos Trecroci)
J. Mens. Health 2022, 18(7), 148;
Submitted: 5 March 2022 | Revised: 21 March 2022 | Accepted: 25 March 2022 | Published: 6 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sports training, recovery and nutrition in male athletes)
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Background: The present study aimed to determine the association of anthropometry-based characteristics with an aggregate score (AS) of physical performance in young elite soccer players. Methods: Sixteen under 15 elite players were enrolled. Among numerous anthropometrics variables, upper arm contracted (UACC) and relaxed circumference (UARC), corrected arm muscle area (AMAcorr), arm muscle circumference (AMC), thigh muscle circumference (TMC) and suprapatellar girths were also employed in this study. Players’ physical performance was assessed by the change of direction (COD), 10 m and 20 m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ) test, sprint with 90 turns (with ball), and yo-yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (Yo-Yo IRT1). The AS was computed by Principal Components Analysis technique with one component on normalized performance results. A stepwise regression analysis was conducted to assess potential association between anthropometry-based variables and AS. Results: Large negative correlations (r < –0.68) of AS with UACC, UARC, AMAcorr, and AMC were detected. UACC and TMC permits to accurately estimate AS explaining 60% of the total variance (p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings demonstrated the importance of including anthropometry-based measures of both upper and lower body to the physical performance potential expressed by AS in elite youth soccer.

body composition
physical performance
1. Introduction

Anthropometry is of great importance in soccer performance [1] and health [2, 3, 4], especially when dealing with youngsters [5]. During growth, players undergo several morphological (e.g., upper and lower limb sizes) and body composition variations (e.g., balancing from low-to-high level of fat and lean mass) capable to characterize the way a young individual moves on and off the pitch [6, 7]. Upper and lower limb fat areas are associated with repeated sprint ability (best and mean sprint time) [8], with the overall fat mass being apparently one of the affecting anthropometric predictors of change of direction (COD) ability [9] in young elite soccer players. While suboptimal total body composition (excessive fat mass) may contribute to also impair aerobic, sprint, and jump performance [10, 11], the size of upper limbs appeared to be associated to a better sprint performance [9]. Accordingly, arm muscle and mid-upper arm circumferences were previously reported among the best predictors of 10 m and 20 m sprint performance in under 15 elite soccer players [9].

The nature of soccer performance is multidimensional having the young players being already required to cope with many demands underpinning certain muscle strength and power [12], agility and CODs [13], brief sprints [14], jumps [13], and aerobic [15] qualities. Altogether, these qualities identify the focus of field-based training along with technical and tactical stimuli to be addressed in order to keep each player fit, healthy, and competitive as much as possible. From a practical perspective, the idea to manage the training process by monitoring the multidimensional performance (holistically) can work to the advantage of practitioners [16], especially if information based on an individual’s anthropometric measures (e.g., morphological data of upper and lower limbs) can be associated. To date, most of the studies established significantly relationships between morphology and body composition with aerobic fitness [8, 9, 10, 17, 18], repeated sprint ability [8], straight sprint [8, 9, 17] and vertical jump [8, 9, 17] performance as separate measures (single score) without formulating an holistic information (aggregate score) about the potential association between anthropometry and an overall players’ physical performance status. Additional knowledge on such association might be useful to develop training programs aimed to improve the athleticism and health of young soccer players.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the association of anthropometric-based characteristics with an aggregate score (AS) of physical performance in young elite soccer players.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Design

A Cross-sectional design was employed in order to provide information on the potential association of anthropometry and physical performance at a given time [19].

2.2 Participants

Sixteen males under 15 elite soccer players (ages 14.0 ± 1.3 years, body weight 63.4 ± 6.4 kg, height 175.8 ± 5.8 cm, fat mass = 10.56 ± 1.44%, fat-free mass = 89.44 ± 1.44%) voluntarily participated in the study. All players were part of the same soccer academy of an Italian professional club (Serie A division). Soccer training experience (~6.0 ± 1.0 year) and weekly training routine (4 sessions and a week-end match) were similar among the players. All the participants were informed about the experimental risks and procedures. They verbally agreed and provided a written consent along with their parents. The study procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the local University.

2.3 Procedures

The experimental setting and procedures took place in June. All participants were tested twice with at least 48 h in between. In the first occasion, among several anthropometric measurements, body mass and height were also included in the assessment. In the second occasion, all the participants underwent a testing battery encompassing, sprint, vertical jump, COD ability, dribbling, and aerobic performance assessment. They were instructed to avoid any moderate-to-high-intensity physical efforts in the 2 days before as well as abstaining from consuming caffeinated drinks in the 24 h prior testing.

2.4 Morphological Data Assessment

The morphological data assessment included the: (1) the direct measurement of upper arm relaxed (UARC) and contracted (UACC) circumference, waist (WC) and hip (HC) circumferences, suprapatellar girths (SPG) derived from both right and left legs, sum of 8 skinfolds (Ʃ8 SKF) (retrieved from adding triceps, subscapular, biceps, iliac crest, supraspinal, abdominal, anterior thigh, and medial calf thickness), sum of 4 skinfold (Ʃ4 SKF) (retrieved from adding anterior thigh, abdominal, triceps, and medial calf thickness), and the sum of 2 skinfold (Ʃ2 SKF) (retrieved from adding triceps and subscapular thickness) for each participant. Then, fat mass was obtained by SKF measures and subtracted from body mass to derive fat-free mass (FFM) following a recent approach [20]; (2) the indirect measurement of upper arm muscle (AMA) and thigh muscle (TMA) areas, upper arm fat (AFA) and thigh fat (TFA) areas, arm muscle (AMC) and thigh muscle (TMC) circumferences [21] for each participant. Additionally, a corrected value of AMA (AMAcorr) was also computed by the Heymsfield’s equation. Circumference, girths, and skinfolds were measured to the nearest of 0.1 cm (by a tape, Lufkin executive thinline, W606ME) and 0.1 mm (by a skinfold caliper, Holtain Ltd, Crymych, UK), respectively. A certified professional performed all the measurements as previously reported [9].

2.5 Physical Performance Assessment

Physical performance assessment included the following tests: 10 m and 20 m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ) test, change of direction (COD) ability, sprint with 90 turns (with ball), and yo-yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (Yo-Yo IRT1). This testing order was chosen to avoid potential fatigue-related effects while also planning an adequate recovery period of 10 min between each test [13]. Except to Yo-Yo IRT1, running/sprinting-based tests were conducted using an electronic timing gates system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) to detect time performance. All tests were conducted outdoor on an artificial turf at the same time of day for each participant.

Sprint performance. Sprinting time over 10 m (split time, from 0 m to 10 m) and 20 m sprint were recorded at the same time. At their volition, the participants started accelerating maximally up to 20 m. There were allowed three trials with a 2 min recovery in between. The best time recorded at 10 m and 20 m were integrated to the analysis.

Vertical jump. The participants performed a countermovement jump (CMJ) test to indirectly record vertical jump height by the Optojump next system (Optojump Next System, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). During the trial, they were asked to jump keeping their hands on the hips without bending the legs from take-off and landing phase. There were planned three CMJ trials interspersed by 2 min of recovery, and the highest jump trial was used for the analysis

COD ability. COD ability was tested over a 5 m + 5 m course with a turning point (90) represented by a cone. For a better description of the test please refer to the work of Trecroci et al. [22]. The distance between the starting line to the cone and between the cone to the finish line was 5 m each. The participants changed direction around the cone using the same side-step technique in each bout. There were planned 3 bouts in each direction and the average best performance (between right and left directions) time was considered. A 2 min recovery period was given between each bout. Then, together with the 10 m sprint time were used to calculate the COD deficit. Specifically, it was possible by subtracting the 10 m sprint time from the average best performance time. As previously suggested, COD deficit has the potential to assess an actual COD ability unbiased toward linear sprint capacity [23, 24].

Dribbling skill. To assess players’ dribbling skill was employed the sprint test with 90 turns whit ball (S90 with ball). All participants were asked to perform six 90 turns as fast as possible around six markers, within a 15 m course. For a better description of the test layout refer to the original work by Sporis et al. [25]. There were planned 3 trials while dribbling the ball with 2 min recovery period in between. The best performance time was integrated in the analysis.

Aerobic performance. Yo-yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (Yo-Yo IRT1) test was performed to assess player’s aerobic performance. The test consists of 2 × 20 m shuttle runs at increasing speeds, interspersed with 10 s of active recovery, controlled by audio signals according to the guidelines by Bangsbo et al. [26]. Once a participant was no longer able to maintain the required speed the test ended. At this stage, the distance achieved was recorded and integrated in the analysis.

2.6 Statistical Analysis

Data distribution was verified by the Shapiro Wilk’s test for each variable. Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC – 3,1) was computed for reliability purposes. The aggregate physical performance score (AS) was computed by Principal Components Analysis (PCA) technique on normalized (min-max scaler approach) performance results. A stepwise regression with forward propagation analysis was conducted to assess potential association between anthropometry-based variables and AS. Statistical analysis was performed using Python 3.8 language programming, and the IBM SPSS Statistics software (v. 21, New York, NY, USA). The statistical significance was set at 0.05 (5%).

3. Results

ICC values showed good-to-high reliability within the physical performance test ranging from 0.89 to 0.94. The AS score created by three components PCA explained 94% of the total variance of the performance test. Strong negative correlation was detected between AS score and sprint 10 m (r = –0.98, p < 0.001), sprint 20 m (r = –0.95, p < 0.001), CMJ (r = –0.89, p < 0.001), and COD (r = –0.80, p < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, low correlation coefficient was detected between AS score and Yo-Yo IRT1 test (r = –0.05, p > 0.1), and S90 with ball (r = –0.40, p > 0.05). Correlation analysis between AS score and morphological data was reported in Fig. 1. In particular, AS score was negatively correlated with morphological data such as UACC (r = –0.75, p < 0.001), UARC (r = –0.68, p < 0.05), AMA (r = –0.68, p < 0.05), and AMC (r = –0.68, p < 0.05). Table 1 and Eqn. 1 shows the stepwise linear regression outcome. Specifically, only UACC and TMC were included in the final model as the best predictors of the AS. Both variables explained 60% of the AS variance (p < 0.001).

Fig. 1.

Correlation matrix on a heat map. Note: UARC, upper arm relaxed circumference; UACC, upper arm contracted circumference; SPG, suprapatellar girth; WC, waist circumference; HC, hip circumference; Ʃ8 SKF, sum of 8 skinfolds; Ʃ4 SKF, sum of 4 skinfolds; Ʃ2 SKF, sum of 2 skinfolds; TFA, thigh fat area; TMA, thigh muscle area; AFA, arm fat area; AMA, arm muscle area; AMAcorr, corrected arm muscle area; AMC, arm muscle circumference; TMC, thigh, muscle circumference; FFM, fat-free mass.

Table 1.Stepwise linear regression analysis.
Predictor Coefficient t-score p-value
Constant 3.572 ± 1.605 2.226 0.044
UACC –0.278 ± 0.061 –4.549 0.001
TMC 0.089 ± 0.046 2.925 0.036
Note: UACC, upper arm contracted circumference; TMC, thigh muscle circumference.

(1) AS = 3.572 - 0.278 × UACC × - 0.278 + 0.089 × TMC

4. Discussion

The main findings of this study revealed that UACC and TMC predicted the AS in young elite soccer players. In other words, measures of upper and lower limbs were informative enough to explain most of the variance of a holistic performance underpinning short sprints, vertical jump, COD, dribbling, and aerobic performance qualities. To the extent of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study taking into account the potential association between anthropometric measures and an overall physical performance status in youth elite soccer.

Most of the studies investigated the informative role of anthropometric assessment on several aspects of performance on an individual level [8, 9, 10, 17, 18]. However, the present finding appears in line with that previously observed by the mentioned studies. For instance, Bongiovanni and colleagues demonstrated that the upper and lower body anthropometric features were strictly related to sprint and aerobic fitness performance in U15 elite male soccer players [9]. Moreover, they reported that morphological features linked to specific body regions (upper and lower limb) may be preferred over whole body measures to interpret male players’ physical potential in vertical jump and sprint performance [27, 28]. In keeping with this, it has been demonstrated that regional (lower limb), rather than total body composition (i.e., bioimpedance-related parameters), was more susceptible to changes in response to a training period along with physical performance improvement (i.e., vertical jump and aerobic fitness) [29]. All together these findings lead to assume that controlling for regional anthropometric parameters (morphological or body composition parameters) could improve the understanding of the association between “body recomposition” [30] and performance linked to the efficacy of specific targeted training programs.

How the overall physical performance status is associated with upper and lower limb variables (i.e., UACC and TMC, respectively) opens an interesting methodological assessment front. For instance, obtaining UACC and TMC may be an affordable and non-invasively mean to collect information on several physical determinants of soccer performance at once. This applies well in soccer where the time available for testing is limited and field-based tests such as CMJ and Yo-Yo IRT1 may represent a practical challenge to implement, being an additional load for players. Conversely, no other information exist in literature to be compared, thus additional studies will have to establish the potential relationship between morphological data and different types of AS, perhaps not only derived from product-oriented scores (based on a quantitative performance score as jump height or distance covered in CMJ and Yo-Yo- IRT1, respectively) but also on more process-oriented scores embracing movement quality assessment (based on a qualitative performance scores) as athletic ability assessment [31], soccer injury movement screen [32], and functional movement screen [33, 34]. Such information would contribute to monitor the components related to injury prevention and health spheres [35, 36].

5. Study Limitations

Of note, the present study does not provide any information on potential gender difference, and it may represent a limitation. Indeed, males have greater relative lean muscles mass than females counterpart, especially in specific body regions (i.e., upper body) [37]. Accounting for such difference would provide additional and extended knowledge on the role of anthropometric (i.e., morphology and body composition) variable of upper and lower body regions on physical performance in female soccer players. This could work to the advantage of practitioners who would better support their female athletes by managing strength and lean body mass development in the attempt to improve their health and athleticism [38].

6. Conclusions

The current study reported that upper and lower morphological measures in terms of UACC and TMC are important predictors for the overall physical performance status in youth elite soccer. The assessment of a few anthropometric data may be very insightful to derive a holistic information of young players’ physical potential. This would also allow practitioners to save time and effort while avoiding discomfort to their players of undergoing a physical testing battery within the competitive period.

Author Contributions

AR, TB, and AT designed the research study. AR, TB, GM, LC, and AT performed the research. FMI provided help and advice on experimental procedures. AR analyzed the data. AR and AT wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Milan (Approval number: 32/16).


Not applicable.


This work is supported by the European Community’s H2020 Program under the funding scheme H2020-INFRAIA-2019-1 Research Infrastructures grant agreement 871042,, accessed on 2 November 2021, SoBigData++: European Integrated Infrastructure for Social Mining and Big Data Analytics. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There was no additional external funding received for this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. AT is serving as one of the Guest editors of this journal. We declare that AT had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to DM.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Tereso D, Paulo R, Petrica J, Duarte-Mendes P, Gamonales JM, Ibáñez SJ. Assessment of body composition, lower limbs power, and anaerobic power of senior soccer players in Portugal: differences according to the competitive Level. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 8069.
Bangsbo J, Hansen PR, Dvorak J, Krustrup P. Recreational football for disease prevention and treatment in untrained men: a narrative review examining cardiovascular health, lipid profile, body composition, muscle strength and functional capacity. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015; 49: 568–576.
Eberl M, Tanaka LF, Klug SJ, Adamek HE. Football as a Health Promotion Strategy. Deutsches Arzteblatt international. 2019; 116: 721–728.
Zouhal H, Hammami A, Tijani JM, Jayavel A, de Sousa M, Krustrup P, et al. Effects of Small-Sided Soccer Games on Physical Fitness, Physiological Responses, and Health Indices in Untrained Individuals and Clinical Populations: a Systematic Review. Sports Medicine. 2020; 50: 987–1007.
Toselli S, Marini E, Maietta Latessa P, Benedetti L, Campa F. Maturity related differences in body composition assessed by classic and specific bioimpedance vector analysis among male elite youth soccer players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 729.
Nikolaidis PT, Vassilios Karydis N. Physique and body composition in soccer players across adolescence. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011; 2: 75–82.
Leão C, Camões M, Clemente FM, Nikolaidis PT, Lima R, Bezerra P, et al. Anthropometric profile of soccer players as a determinant of position specificity and methodological issues of body composition estimation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16: 2386.
Campa F, Semprini G, Júdice P, Messina G, Toselli S. Anthropometry, Physical and Movement Features, and Repeated-sprint Ability in Soccer Players. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019; 40: 100–109.
Bongiovanni T, Trecroci A, Cavaggioni L, Rossi A, Perri E, Pasta G, et al. Importance of anthropometric features to predict physical performance in elite youth soccer: a machine learning approach. Research in Sports Medicine. 2021; 29: 213–224.
Esco MR, Fedewa MV, Cicone ZS, Sinelnikov OA, Sekulic D, Holmes CJ. Field-Based Performance Tests are Related to Body Fat Percentage and Fat-Free Mass, but not Body Mass Index, in Youth Soccer Players. Sports. 2018; 6: 105.
Hazir T. Physical Characteristics and Somatotype of Soccer Players according to Playing Level and Position. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2010; 26: 83–95.
Silva JR, Nassis GP, Rebelo A. Strength training in soccer with a specific focus on highly trained players. Sports Medicine-Open. 2015; 1: 17.
Trecroci A, Duca M, Formenti D, Alberti G, Iaia FM, Longo S. Short-term compound training on physical performance in young soccer players. Sports. 2020; 8: 108.
Chaouachi A, Chtara M, Hammami R, Chtara H, Turki O, Castagna C. Multidirectional sprints and small-sided games training effect on agility and change of direction abilities in youth soccer. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2014; 28: 3121–3127.
O’Reilly J, Wong SHS. The development of aerobic and skill assessment in soccer. Sports Medicine. 2012; 42: 1029–1040.
Turner AN, Jones B, Stewart P, Bishop C, Parmar N, Chavda S, et al. Total Score of Athleticism: Holistic Athlete Profiling to Enhance Decision-Making. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2019; 41: 91–101.
Gil SM, Gil J, Ruiz F, Irazusta A, Irazusta J. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of young soccer players according to their playing position: relevance for the selection process. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2007; 21: 438–445.
Teixeira AS, Valente-dos-Santos J, Coelho-E-Silva MJ, Malina RM, Fernandes-da-Silva J, Cesar do Nascimento Salvador P, et al. Skeletal Maturation and Aerobic Performance in Young Soccer Players from Professional Academies. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015; 36: 1069–1075.
Montero I, León OG. A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2007; 7: 847–862.
Munguia-Izquierdo D, Suarez-Arrones L, Di Salvo V, Paredes-Hernandez V, Alcazar J, Ara I, et al. Validation of Field Methods to Assess Body Fat Percentage in Elite Youth Soccer Players. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018; 39: 349–354.
Frisancho AR. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1981; 34: 2540–2545.
Trecroci A, Rossi A, Dos’Santos T, Formenti D, Cavaggioni L, Longo S, et al. Change of direction asymmetry across different age categories in youth soccer. PeerJ. 2020; 8: e9486.
Nimphius S, Callaghan SJ, Spiteri T, Lockie RG. Change of Direction Deficit: a more Isolated Measure of Change of Direction Performance than Total 505 Time. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2016; 30: 3024–3032.
Nimphius S, Callaghan SJ, Bezodis NE, Lockie RG. Change of Direction and Agility Tests: Challenging our Current Measures of Performance. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2017; 40: 26–38.
Sporis G, Jukic I, Milanovic L, Vucetic V. Reliability and factorial validity of agility tests for soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2010; 24: 679–686.
Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test: a useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports. Sports Medicine. 2008; 38: 37–51.
Bongiovanni T, Rossi A, Iaia FM, Alberti G, Pasta G, Trecroci A. Association of phase angle and appendicular upper and lower body lean soft tissue with physical performance in young elite soccer players: a pilot study. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2021. (in press)
Bongiovanni T, Rossi A, Iaia FM, Di Baldassarre A, Pasta G, Manetti P, et al. Relationship of regional and whole body morphology to vertical jump in elite soccer players: a data driven approach. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2021. (in press)
Honorato R, Ferraz ASM, Kassiano W, Martins PC, Silva DAS, Ceccatto VM. Regional phase angle, not whole-body, is augmented in response to preseason in professional soccer players. Research in Sports Medicine. 2022. (in press)
Barakat C, Pearson J, Escalante G, Campbell B, De Souza EO. Body Recomposition: can Trained Individuals Build Muscle and Lose Fat at the same Time? Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2020; 42: 7–21.
McKeown I, Taylor-McKeown K, Woods C, Ball N. Athletic ability assessment: a movement assessment protocol for athletes. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2014; 9: 862–873.
McCunn R, Aus der Fünten K, Govus A, Julian R, Schimpchen J, Meyer T. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the soccer injury movement screen (sims). International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2017; 12: 53–66.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2006; 1: 132–139.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2006; 1: 62–72.
Bongiovanni T, Pintus R, Dessì A, Noto A, Finco G, Corsello G, et al. Sportomics: metabolomics applied to sports. The new revolution? European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2019; 23: 11011–11019.
Pintus R, Bongiovanni T, Corbu S, Francavilla VC, Dessì A, Noto A, et al. Sportomics in professional soccer players: metabolomics results during preseason. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2021; 61: 324–330.
Kirchengast S. Gender Differences in Body Composition from Childhood to Old Age: an Evolutionary Point of View. Journal of Life Sciences. 2010; 2: 1–10.
Emmonds S, Nicholson G, Begg C, Jones B, Bissas A. Importance of Physical Qualities for Speed and Change of Direction Ability in Elite Female Soccer Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2019; 33: 1669–1677.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to top