IMR Press / JOMH / Volume 18 / Issue 7 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1807143
Open Access Editorial
Why Qualitative Research Should Be Used to Explore and Understand Men's Health
Show Less
1 Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, 8320000 Santiago, Chile
3 Department of Adult, Child and Midwifery, School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, NW4 4BT London, UK
*Correspondence: (José Granero-Molina)
J. Mens. Health 2022, 18(7), 143;
Submitted: 5 April 2022 | Revised: 21 April 2022 | Accepted: 21 April 2022 | Published: 28 June 2022
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
men's health
qualitative research

The aim of positivism and neopositivism is to understand reality in order to transform it. From this point of view, experimentation, innovation, and technological development are the keys to knowledge and progression. Applying these basic principles to the study of human health, essentially through biomedical research, has brought about extraordinary achievements in the diagnosis, cure, and rehabilitation of diseases. From this paradigm, health sciences study, treat, and care for «living bodies», sometimes limited to the condition of physical bodies, overlooking the fact that each one is unique at a biological and biographical level. Thus, behind the scientific evidence and the generalisation of processes, health also encompasses experiences, subjectivity, meanings, and interactions [1]. As stated by H.G. Gadamer [2], “health entails a state of harmony with the social and natural environment”. From this perspective, health cannot exist without the collaboration of the individual who demands healing, care, attention, or accompaniment. Therefore, only if we distinguish between the calculable and non-calculable in the wide range of these sciences will qualitative research form an unavoidable complement to basic and technological research. In regards to health/disease, the patient, family, healthcare providers, and researchers “other living bodies” work together, endowed with individuality and their own identity. Along with other qualities, sex, and gender identity modulate how we experience health, illness, and life [3]. Hence, biomedical research must attend to their questions, contemplate their designs, and analyse their inferences. Multiple health risks and determinants are associated with sex or gender identity; for example, masculine social norms and pressures can explain unhealthy behaviours of men, and new masculinities shape life and lifestyles. Qualitative research is needed to understand men’s experiences of the health/disease process, at all stages of development, pathologies, or cultures. Qualitative data related to gender can improve the interpretation of findings in quantitative studies, though despite the gender bias, the underrepresentation of men in many studies samples is evident [4]. Understanding experiences of andropause, the role of the couple, alteration of hegemonic masculinity, or sexual dysfunctions is key in men with prostate cancer, mental health problems, grief, or suicide. However, there is often a tendency to ignore the experiences of these men; either because they are reluctant to receive therapy [5], to participate in studies, or because they fear being perceived as feminine or vulnerable [6, 7].

Traditional masculinity is characterised by traits such as independence, toughness, assertiveness, competitiveness, and physical competence [8]. Nevertheless, the emergence of new masculinities that challenge traditional stereotypes has been seen in contemporary times. In Western societies oriented to performance and productivity, concern for health and body image has become paramount in men. Consequently, pathologies such as prostate cancer can not only endanger their lives, but also uncover self-image problems, stigma, job exclusion, or sexual dysfunction [9]. Help-seeking and social support for health problems are also associated with gender identity, social norms, barriers, and constructions of masculinity [10].

Future research should delve into how men can retain a “masculine” sense of identity while participating in the system to maintain their health, longevity, or quality of life [11]. In contrast to the prevailing heteronormativity, and together with clinical-epidemiological designs, understanding the experiences and impact of masculinities on men’s health opens up the possibility for qualitative designs (descriptive, ethnographic, phenomenological, grounded theory or participatory action research). In turn, the results of this research should serve as a basis for generating hypotheses and developing questionnaires or implications for practice that improve health, quality of life, aging, and the end of the life for men (Fig. 1). These studies must also lead to specific practices of health promotion with the participation of the family, couple, and/or the community, and be the source for grounded theory designs or Participatory Action Research [12].

Fig. 1.

Conceptual map: contribution of qualitative health research to men’s health research.

It is therefore necessary to sensitise healthcare providers and researchers on the challenges of qualitative research methodologies applied to men’s health. Carrying out interviews, discussion groups or action research with young men, immigrants, older adults or those at the end of life, while considering the specificity of their masculinity or gender identifies. In this sense, the use of new methodologies such as photo elicitation or photovoice can be helpful in qualitative health research applied to the study of men’s health [13].

Author Contributions

JGM and JMHP contributed to the conception of this paper. CFS provided help and advice on theoretical and philosophical issues applied to qualitative health research. JGM, CFS and JMHP wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.


We are grateful for the contributions from the “University Expert in Qualitative Research with ATLAS.ti Course”, Centre for Continuing Education, University of Almeria.


This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Granero-Molina J. Phenomenology. Phenomenological studies. In Fernández-Sola C, Granero-Molina J, Hernández-Padilla JM (eds.) Understand to care. Advances in qualitative research in Health Sciences (pp. 103–123). Editorial Universidad de Almería: Almería, España. 2019.
Gadamer HG. The enigma of health. Ed.Gedisa, Barcelona, España. 1996.
Weber AM, Gupta R, Abdalla S, Cislaghi B, Meausoone V, Darmstadt GL. Gender-related data missingness, imbalance and bias in global health surveys. BMJ Global Health. 2021; 6: e007405.
Affleck W, Glass K, Macdonald ME. The Limitations of Language: male participants, stoicism, and the qualitative research interview. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2013; 7: 155–162.
Seidler ZE, Wilson MJ, Trail K, Rice SM, Kealy D, Ogrodniczuk JS, et al. Challenges working with men: Australian therapists’ perspectives. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2021; 77: 2781–2797.
Scholz B, Crabb S, Wittert GA. “Males Don’t Wanna Bring anything up to their Doctor”: Men’s Discourses of Depression. Qualitative Health Research. 2017; 27: 727–737.
King K, Dow B, Keogh L, Feldman P, Milner A, Pierce D, et al. “is Life Worth Living?”: the Role of Masculinity in the Way Men Aged over 80 Talk about Living, Dying, and Suicide. American Journal of Men’S Health. 2020; 14: 1557988320966540.
Peel A, Martin S, Vincent A, Turnbull D, Wang X, Mcgee M, et al. Testosterone and self-perceived masculinity in an australian cohort of community-dwelling men. Journal of Mens Health. 2020; 16: e28–e44.
Martínez-Bordajandi A, Fernández-Sola C, Puga-Mendoza AP, López-Entrambasaguas OM, Lucas-Matheu M, Granero-Molina J, et al. Sexual experiences after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2020; 33: eAPE20190237.
Fernández-Sola C, Martínez-Bordajandi Á, Puga-Mendoza AP, Hernández-Padilla JM, Jobim-Fischer V, López-Rodríguez MDM, et al. Social Support in Patients with Sexual Dysfunction after Non-Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: a Qualitative Study. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2020; 14: 1557988320906977.
Mahalik JR, Backus Dagirmanjian FR. Working Men’s Constructions of Visiting the Doctor. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2018; 12: 1582–1592.
Schoenfeld ER, Francis LE. Word on the Street: engaging local leaders in a dialogue about prostate cancer among african americans. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2016; 10: 377–388.
Creighton GM, Brussoni M, Oliffe JL, Han C. Picturing Masculinities: Using Photoelicitation in Men’s Health Research. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2017; 11: 1472–1485.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to top