IMR Press / JOMH / Volume 18 / Issue 11 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jomh1811210
Open Access Original Research
An Analysis of Difference in Preventive Health Behaviors for COVID-19 by Personality Characteristics in College Athletes
Show Less
1 Department of Sports, Kyungil University, 38428 Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Physical Education, Chung-Ang University, 06974 Seoul, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence: (JeongHyung Cho)
J. Mens. Health 2022, 18(11), 210;
Submitted: 1 June 2022 | Revised: 2 August 2022 | Accepted: 10 August 2022 | Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sports, Exercise and Physical Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic)
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Background: Due to the uniqueness of COVID-19 compared with other infectious diseases, the need for various countermeasures against it should be emphasized, and considering that most athletes are not allowed to wear masks during competitions, stricter preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 are required among these individuals. Therefore, in an attempt to yield data that may be used to increase the engagement in preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 among college athletes, this study investigated the differences in preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 according to personality types. Material and Methods: Based on the Big Five personality theory, the relationship between preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 and personality characteristics was tested. Data were collected from 65 participants (male: n = 53, female: n = 12) through a questionnaire survey. Results: The results showed no differences in preventive health behaviors according to demographic characteristics such as sex, grade, sports type, and career. The highest score for a personality type was for conscientiousness, and those with a higher level of conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness reported higher scores for preventive health behavior for COVID-19. Interestingly, those with low openness also reported higher scores for preventive health behaviors for COVID-19. Conclusions: These results are expected to be used as important information to restrict the spread of COVID-19 and promote preventive health behaviors among college athletes.

1. Introduction

Although more than two years have passed since the World Health Organization’s declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, the pandemic has yet to end [1, 2]. As COVID-19 is different from other previous infectious diseases, the need for various countermeasures in the future is emphasized [3]. Experts have pointed out various reasons why COVID-19 continues, including the lack of preventive action and lowered awareness among the public regarding the seriousness of the pandemic due to psychological changes resulting from its prolonged state [4]. Regarding COVID-19, the Korean government has recommended and continues to recommend various preventive (e.g., social distancing, refraining from engaging in group activities, and strict compliance with personal hygiene guidelines) and social change measures (e.g., postponement of school start, forced self-quarantine for inbound travelers, and closure of group facilities, including churches) to tackle it [5]. These changes affected the sports community without exception, leading to the closure of gyms, group sports facilities, and other sports-related institutions in the field of live sports; these changes created restrictions for opportunities regarding not only sports viewing but also sports performance.

As the number of people infected with COVID-19 has decreased, the Korean government has recently introduced health prevention activities [6] in order to restore people’s daily life, and is working hard to try and overcome the impact of COVID-19 [7]. This is also the case for athletes, as all competitions and team training were restricted and only individual self-training was allowed due to the COVID-19. However, on the premise of observing the COVID-19 guidelines, almost all games have been held starting with professional games (e.g., soccer, baseball, basketball, and volleyball) and eventually translating into players in other sports, who began to participate in team training and games. This case was also introduced as an excellent case for demonstrating how the Korean government should respond to COVID-19 [8].

A study [5] showed that social distancing is an important part of Koreans’ preventive health behavior, as well as that the level of preventive behavior is high among those with companions. Korean college athletes typically prevent injuries through personal body management [9], and since these athletes deem their health as importantly as their wealth, they take special care of it. However, COVID-19 has worsened the health of athletes and has brought forth mandatory preventive behaviors, such as wearing masks and social distancing. Although they tend to perform these preventive behaviors in accordance with the national policy, the level of engagement may vary by individual personality and the environment. For example, scholars have shown that those married reported higher levels of preventive health behaviors for fear of transmitting COVID-19 to their family members [5], and a research showed that professional basketball players differed in their preventive health behaviors according to personality type, career, and injury status [10].

Because most individual behaviors—preventive health behaviors included—are voluntary, performance levels vary according to own personality and skills. In particular, individual personality has an important influence not only on one’s career choices but also on many other aspects of one’s life, including which types of leisure activities people engage for health, hobbies, and social life. Freudenberger, a behavioral psychologist, in a study on individual personality, showed that since sensitive people have high burnout and a high dependence on affection, even a slight change in their environment strongly influences their psychology and behavior [11]. Supporting this assumption within the context of COVID-19, sensitive people have been shown to have high levels of depression due to social restrictions caused by the pandemic [12]. Moreover, people with high extraversion liked to interact with others and are more inclined to express their feelings openly in order to attract attention from others, and that people with high conscientiousness tend to follow social rules, norms, and principles honestly, work hard, have a high sense of responsibility, and make and follow plans. Some studies also demonstrate that personality is a strong predictor of people’s adaptation to life [13], and a basic and important variable in college students’ adaptation to school life [14].

2. Purpose

Personality seems to be a reliable predictor of individual behavior, especially during university, when individual choices and responsibility are both important. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the personality characteristics of college athletes and investigate the relationship between personality and preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 according to individual demographic characteristics, including sports type, sex, and injury experience.

The final purpose of this study was to identify the importance of preventive health behaviors performed by college athletes against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic and the unprecedented challenges it brought forth. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data for the establishment of guidelines of preventive behaviors to fight COVID-19 and to provide important information to prevent the spread of infectious diseases like COVID-19 among college athletes in the future.

3. Materials and Methods
3.1 Participants

Study participants were recruited through purposeful sampling, and college students from the first to fourth years of K University, who participated in the university league, were targeted. The target sports selected based on the characteristics of each event were taekwondo, volleyball, and baseball players. Data were collected from 65 participants (male: n = 53; female: n = 12) through a questionnaire survey. In this study, after consultation with experts, it was decided that ethically problematic or sensitive items would not be investigated, and the research complies with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

3.2 Instruments

This study used a questionnaire survey comprising items on demographic characteristics, personality, and COVID-19 preventive health behavior. All questionnaires were completed using an anonymous self-report method, and only those who provided informed consent after receiving an explanation of the research in advance were allowed to complete the questionnaire. The detailed factors surveyed in the questionnaire were as follows.

3.2.1 Preventive Health Behaviors

The preventive health behaviors measured in this study comprised infection prevention behaviors for COVID-19. This study used a scale developed by Kim and Cho [5], which was in turn based on the prevention behaviors for infectious diseases proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [15] and on the basic preventive health behavior guidelines provided by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Its 11 items (e.g., “I ventilate the room frequently” and “I avoid crowded places”) are responded on a Likert 5-point scale, ranging 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). In the study by Kim and Cho [5], the Cronbach’s α coefficient for this scale was 0.838; in this study, it was 0.839.

3.2.2 Personality Characteristics

The personality characteristics of college athletes were measured using a 20-item scale developed based on the Big Five Brief Version proposed by Turiano et al. [16]. Due to the period when the current paper was conducted—namely, during the enforcement of social distancing measures due to the COVID-19 pandemic—the agreeableness factor and related items were excluded. Accordingly, the final scale comprised 16-items, being responded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (strongly agree).

3.3 Data Analysis

To examine the differences in preventive health behaviors according to the personality characteristics of college athletes, all data were subjected to encoding and error reviews. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with descriptive and frequency analyses being used for describing participants’ characteristics. The Cronbach’s α test and factor analysis were performed to verify the reliability and validity of the scale used. In addition, analysis of variance was performed to determine whether there were differences in preventive health behaviors according to personality characteristics. Significance level for this study was set at a p < 0.05. Normality test was performed to confirm the normal distribution of the data with preventive health behaviors as a dependent variable; results showed a skewness of –0.320, a kurtosis of –0.843, and the results of Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s significance test showed a p > 0.200, confirming the normal distribution of the data.

4. Results
4.1 Personality Characteristics Scale Validity and Reliability

Table 1 shows the results of the exploratory factor analysis performed to determine the validity and reliability of the personality characteristics scale. Cronbach’s α coefficients of the subscales were 0.926 for conscientiousness, 0.918 for extraversion, 0.809 for neuroticism, and 0.806 for openness, indicating good validity and reliability.

Table 1.Results of exploratory factor analysis for the personality characteristics scale.
Subfactor Item Component
1 2 3 4 h2
Conscientiousness Conscientiousness 6 0.888 0.214 –0.122 0.162 0.876
Conscientiousness 7 0.875 0.222 0.000 0.139 0.834
Conscientiousness 8 0.831 0.341 –0.052 0.074 0.815
Conscientiousness 5 0.830 0.244 0.041 0.090 0.759
Extraversion Extraversion 9 0.316 0.869 –0.025 0.024 0.856
Extraversion 12 0.200 0.864 0.091 –0.012 0.795
Extraversion 10 0.269 0.818 –0.032 0.183 0.776
Extraversion 11 0.305 0.810 –0.038 0.248 0.812
Neuroticism Neuroticism 15 –0.154 –0.036 0.842 0.252 0.798
Neuroticism 14 0.169 –0.102 0.818 0.049 0.710
Neuroticism 16 –0.183 –0.022 0.751 0.180 0.630
Neuroticism 13 –0.048 0.275 0.750 –0.223 0.691
Openness Openness 17 0.285 –0.001 0.521 0.491 0.594
Openness 18 0.328 0.185 0.069 0.826 0.829
Openness 20 0.072 0.019 0.064 0.823 0.687
Openness 19 –0.047 0.506 0.225 0.658 0.742
Cronbach’s α 0.926 0.918 0.809 0.806
Eigenvalue 3.524 3.476 2.867 2.336
Variance (%) 22.023 21.726 17.916 14.602
Accumulation (%) 22.023 43.750 61.666 76.268
Bartlett’s sphericity test: 707.462; df = 120; p < 0.001. KMO measure of sampling adequacy = 0.793.
4.2 Demographic Characteristics

Table 2 shows the demographic characteristics of college athletes. Male (n = 52, 80%) and first-year students (n = 40, 61.5%) accounted for most participants. The most frequent sports type was taekwondo (n = 32, 49.2%), followed by baseball (n = 21, 31.3%) and volleyball (n = 12, 18.4%). The most frequent career period was over 10 years (n = 33, 50.8%), and 40 participants (61%) reported an injury experience, with the mean number of injuries being 1.9. No statistical differences were found for any preventive health behaviors by demographic characteristics.

Table 2.Analysis of differences in demographic characteristics and preventive health behaviors.
Item Frequency (%) Average Standard deviation Mean square F Significance probability Observed power
Average 20.964
Male 52 (80.0) 4.015 0.605 0.070 0.182 0.671 0.070
Female 13 (20.0) 4.097 0.680
Freshman 40 (61.5) 3.984 0.655 0.140 0.357 0.784 0.116
Sophomore 10 (15.4) 4.045 0.697
Junior 6 (9.2) 4.257 0.374
Senior 9 (13.8) 4.080 0.511
Pocket money (KRW)
Under 0.3 M 33 (50.8) 4.148 0.629 0.568 1.518 0.227 0.311
0.3–0.5 M 25 (38.5) 3.956 0.546
Over 0.5 M 7 (10.8) 3.753 0.750
Sports modality
Taekwondo 32 (49.2) 3.900 0.613 0.591 1.580 0.214 0.323
Volleyball 12 (18.4) 4.090 0.340
Baseball 21 (32.3) 4.199 0.715
Career period
Under 5 years 10 (15.4) 3.936 0.791 0.145 0.373 0.690 0.107
6–9 years 22 (33.8) 4.119 0.557
Over 10 years 33 (50.8) 4.002 0.610
Injury experience
Yes 40 (61.5) 4.020 0.633 0.014 0.037 0.848 0.054
No 25 (38.5) 4.050 0.601
Number of injuries
Average 1.9
4.3 Analysis of Differences in Personality Characteristics by Participants’ Demographic Characteristics

A multivariate analysis of variance was performed to examine whether there was a difference in personality characteristics by participants demographic characteristics.

We examined personality characteristics by sex, sports type, and injury experience. The descriptive statistics showed that the scores for conscientiousness (mean [M] = 4.312, standard deviation [SD] = 0.717) and openness (M = 3.855, SD = 0.815) were higher in male than female college athletes. In general, the highest score was for conscientiousness (M = 4.296, SD = 0.744); for baseball players, it was for conscientiousness (M = 4.619, SD = 0.600); for taekwondo, it was for extraversion (M = 4.211, SD = 0.918); for those athletes who had never experienced an injury, it was for conscientiousness (M = 4.619, SD = 0.600); for those who had experienced an injury, the scores for neuroticism (M = 3.213, SD = 0.996) were higher than for those who had never experience an injury (Table 3).

Table 3.Descriptive statistics of personality characteristics by demographic characteristics.
Factor Sex Sports type Injury experience
Male Female Taekwondo Volleyball Baseball Yes No
Conscientiousness M 4.312 4.230 4.179 4.179 4.179 4.250 4.250
SD 0.717 0.874 0.821 0.821 0.821 0.780 0.780
Extraversion M 4.052 4.384 4.211 4.211 4.211 3.988 3.988
SD 0.880 0.826 0.918 0.918 0.918 0.803 0.803
Neuroticism M 3.110 3.403 3.180 3.180 3.18 3.213 3.213
SD 1.068 1.023 0.921 0.921 0.921 0.996 0.996
Openness M 3.855 3.480 3.758 3.758 3.758 3.763 3.763
SD 0.815 0.976 0.862 0.862 0.862 0.891 0.891

A multivariate analysis of variance was performed to examine whether there were differences in personality characteristics by sex (Table 4). The Wilks’ Lambda value was 0.861, a relatively high level, and all the variations among personality characteristics were over 0.05, indicating no differences in personality characteristics by sex.

Table 4.Multivariate analysis of variance results for personality characteristics by sex.
Dependent variables Wilks’ Lambda Df (error df) Variance homogeneity F p Eta2 Power
Conscientiousness 0.861 (p = 0.058) 4 (60) 0.262 0.124 0.726 0.002 0.064
Extraversion 0.818 1.510 0.224 0.023 0.227
Neuroticism 0.623 0.797 0.376 0.012 0.142
Openness 0.325 2.032 0.159 0.031 0.289

Table 5 shows the multivariate analysis of variance results by sports type. The Wilks’ Lambda value was 0.826, and significant differences were found in conscientiousness (F = 1051.453, p < 0.001) and extraversion (F = 3.286, p < 0.05) among sport types.

Table 5.Multivariate analysis of variance results of personality factor by sports type.
Dependent variables Wilks’ Lambda Df (error df) Variance homogeneity F p Eta2 Power
Conscientiousness 0.826 (p = 0.173) 8 (118) 0.004 1051.453 0.000 0.944 1.000
Extraversion 0.188 3.286 0.044 0.096 0.603
Neuroticism 0.217 0.351 0.705 0.011 0.104
Openness 0.880 0.010 0.990 0.000 0.051

Table 6 shows the multivariate analysis of variance results by injury experience. Again, the Wilks’ Lambda value was 0.958 (high level), and all the variations among personality types were over 0.05. However, the differences were significant by injury experience only for conscientiousness (F = 1188.111, p < 0.001).

Table 6.Multivariate analysis of variance results for personality characteristics by injury experience.
Dependent variables Wilks’ Lambda Df (error df) Variance homogeneity F p Eta2 Power
Conscientiousness 0.958 (p = 0.623) 4 (60) 0.349 1188.111 0.000 0.950 1.000
Extraversion 0.723 0.396 0.532 0.006 0.095
Neuroticism 0.313 2.415 0.125 0.037 0.334
Openness 0.324 0.172 0.680 0.003 0.069
4.4 Analysis of Differences in Preventive Health Behaviors by Personality Characteristics

Table 7 shows the differences in preventive health behaviors by personality characteristics. Results showed significant differences in all four personality types: conscientiousness (F = 20.453, p < 0.001), extraversion (F = 5.281, p < 0.001), neuroticism (F = 5.807, p < 0.001), openness (F = 11.984, p < 0.001). Moreover, the average score varied for conscientiousness and openness levels, and those with higher conscientiousness reported higher scores for preventive health behavior.

Table 7.Analysis of differences in preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 by personality characteristics.
Independent variable N M SD Variance homogeneity F p Scheffe
Conscientiousness Low 2 3.091 0.257 0.566 20.453 0.001 c>a,b
Medium 17 3.481 0.479
High 46 4.277 0.493
Extraversion Low 7 3.662 0.370 0.057 5.281 0.008 c>b
Medium 15 3.727 0.723
High 43 4.199 0.549
Neuroticism Low 24 4.083 0.500 0.094 5.807 0.005 c>b
Medium 26 3.773 0.663
High 15 4.400 0.519
Openness Low 8 4.284 0.384 0.090 11.984 0.001 a,c>b
Medium 26 3.636 0.623
High 31 4.299 0.477
5. Discussion

Personality plays an important role in behavioral expression at the individual level. In particular, the characteristics of athletes may be formed or changed by team rules, training, or victory and defeat during competitions. Therefore, considering the importance of preventive health behaviors amid the COVID-19 pandemic, this study aimed to identify differences in preventive health behaviors according to the college athletes’ personality characteristics.

First, we observed that scores for conscientiousness and openness were higher in male participants, while those for extraversion and neuroticism were higher in female participants. This result is consistent with that in Kwon’s study on the relationship between Big Five personality factors and college life adaptation according to sex [17]. Furthermore, the study by Schmitt et al. [18] on behavioral genetics provides evidence that partially supports the current findings, showing that extraversion and neuroticism were higher in female participants, and that openness was higher in male participants. Being a college athlete means that the individual has been exercising continuously since high school, or sometimes even as early as elementary or middle school [19, 20]. Because student athletes have a busy schedule outside their regular study obligations, they are forced to manage their time systematically, meaning that they may tend to be more diligent than their peers of the same age. Early morning training, daytime study, and evening training make students very busy with training and learning, and those who fail to perform these tasks diligently may be expelled [21]. Therefore, the conscientiousness of college athletes may tend to be naturally high. In particular, male college athletes are often driven into fierce competition because the number of contestants is much higher than that of the female athletes. Furthermore, in Korea, male athletes are still preferred as leaders [22, 23], which has formed these characteristics.

The results for differences in personality characteristics by sports type showed that conscientiousness and openness were high among those who practiced baseball, extraversion was high among those who practiced taekwondo, and neuroticism was high among those who practiced volleyball. This suggests that the personality characteristics of college athletes differ clearly by sports type, as well as corroborates the findings in one prior study [24]. Kim et al. [25] reported that athletes who practice sports where direct body contact occurs have a high level of aggression, whereas those who practice sports with only indirect body contact (e.g., through instruments) may have a different personality. For example, baseball players, who do not engage in direct body contact, showed greater conscientiousness to win the game than aggression caused by overheating the game [26]. In addition, because there are more team members in baseball teams than in many other sports types and several candidates must compete for a starting position, competition within baseball teams may be more intense than compared with other sports types. Accordingly, players in team sports, such as baseball, may have a high level of conscientiousness because even those who are talented cannot maintain their current positions without making an effort.

Athletes without injuries were found to have high levels of conscientiousness, extraversion, openness, and low levels of neuroticism. Choi and Oh’s study on the relationship between personality characteristics and sports coping among student athletes with injury experiences demonstrated that conscientiousness influences sports coping, suggesting that conscientious athletes may be more skillful in coping with sports situations and experience less injuries [27]. According to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), athletes who experience injuries display emotional responses such as sadness, a sense of isolation, lack of motivation, anger, embarrassment, and may incur in symptoms such as anorexia and sleep deprivation [28]. Since these symptoms delay the recovery of injuries and reduce athlete’s functionality, coaches who manage the health of college athletes should accurately identify their personality characteristics and prepare appropriate measures according to them.

Finally, results showed that higher scores for all personality types were associated with higher engagement in prevention behaviors for COVID-19. However, the group with lower levels of openness also showed high scores for preventive behaviors for COVID-19; this may be because COVID-19 is a communicable disease [29]. These results indicate that general school rules and team bylaws, as well as personality, are important in determining engagement in preventive health behaviors against COVID-19. Since college athletes hold the statuses of being both athletes and students until they graduate, team activities are more important than individual activities. This means that it may be more effective to manage the prevention health behaviors for COVID-19 of college athletes at the school than at the individual level.

6. Conclusions

This study aimed to investigate preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 by the demographic and personality characteristics of college athletes in order to provide evidence on ways to increase engagement in such behaviors. The findings demonstrate that preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 among college athletes was above average, and that engagement in such behaviors was exceptionally high among baseball players. Regarding personality characteristics, male college volleyball players exhibited higher levels of conscientiousness and openness, and higher conscientiousness correlated with fewer experience of injuries. In addition, since higher scores for all personality characteristics were associated with higher engagement in preventive health behaviors for COVID-19, it may be that emphasizing interventions to promote preventive health behaviors at either the team or school level, rather than at the individual level, proves more effective for improving engagement in such behaviors among university athletes during a pandemic. In sum, this study provides evidence for the correlation between personality characteristics and preventive health behaviors for COVID-19 among college athletes.

Nevertheless, as the design of this study did not control for the lifestyle and training environment of college athletes, caution should be taken when interpreting the study results. To tackle this limitation, and because personality is influenced by individual traits and the surrounding environment, researchers should consider both personality types and demographic characteristics. In addition, evidence based on the use of various and recently developed measurement tools for personality may help to continue to advance our understanding in the related field of research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—Y-JK and YK. Methodology—J-HC. Validation—Y-JK, YK and J-HC. Formal Analysis—J-HC. Investigation—YK and J-HC. Data curation—J-HC and Y-JK. Writing—Original Draft Preparation—YK. Writing—Review and Editing—YK and Y-JK. All the authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

As this was a passive study, approval from an ethical institution was not required, and it was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.


Not applicable.


This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dos Santos LM. Psychological stress, job satisfaction, and career decisions of taxi drivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study of male senior taxi drivers. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 8: 81.
Kim YJ, Kim ES. Depression among Korean men during COVID-19: social media and physical activity. Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 18: 68.
Kim NS. Current status & challenge of COVID-19. Health Welfare Issue & Focus. 2020; 373: 1–13.
Park S, Oh S. Factors associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 among adolescents in South Korea. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2022; 62: e69–e76.
Kim YJ, Cho JH. Correlation between preventive health behaviors and psycho-social health based on the leisure activities of South Koreans in the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 4066.
Adegboye OA, Adekunle AI, Gayawan E. Early transmission dynamics of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 3054.
Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea. Current status of COVID-19 outbreak in Korea. 2022. Available at: (Accessed: 26 June 2022).
Roan D. COVID-19: temporary decision of suspending English Premier League. BBC NEWS Korea. 2020. Available at: (Accessed: 14 March 2020).
Pyo KH. A great player is good at physical management without injury. MK Sports. 2013. Available at: (Accessed: 2 September 2013).
Kim YJ, Cho JH, Kim Y. Influence of Korean professional male basketball players’ characteristics on preventive health behaviors during COVID-19. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 17: 190–197.
Freudenberger HJ. Staff burn‐out. Journal of Social Issues. 1974; 30: 159–165.
Kim HJ. Essential advice for people who are struggling and depressed because they are “too sensitive”. BBCNEW KOREA. 2020. Available at: (Accessed: 8 October 2020).
Credé M, Niehorster S. Adjustment to college as measured by the student adaptation to college questionnaire: a quantitative review of its structure and relationships with correlates and consequences. Educational Psychology Review. 2012; 24: 133–165.
Vazsonyi AT, Ksinan A, Mikuška J, Jiskrova G. The Big Five and adolescent adjustment: an empirical test across six cultures. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015; 83: 234–244.
Centers for Disease Control. Addressing emerging infectious disease threats: a prevention strategy for the United States. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and Reports. 1994; 43: 1–18.
Turiano NA, Mroczek DK, Moynihan J, Chapman BP. Big 5 personality traits and interleukin-6: evidence for “healthy Neuroticism” in a US population sample. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2013; 28: 83–89.
Kwon EJ. The study of relation of Big 5 Personality and college adaptation according to sex. Learner-Centered Curriculum Education Research. 2020; 20: 1147–1167.
Schmitt DP, Realo A, Voracek M, Allik J. Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008; 94: 168–182.
Peltier GL, Laden R, Matranga M. Do high school athletes succeed in college: a review of research. The High School Journal. 1999; 82: 234–238.
Erdoğdu M, Yüksel MF, Işık B, Boyalı E, Erdağı K, Sevindi T. The effects of acute moderate intensity training on hematological parameters in elite para-badminton athletes. Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 18: 35.
Karaduman E, Bostancı Ö, Bayram L. Respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary functions in athletes: differences by BMI classifications. Journal of Men’s Health. 2022; 18: 54.
Kim SW, Jang KR. The effects of mentoring on organizational socialization for intercollegiate athletes. Korean Society for the Sociology of Sport. 2005; 18: 87–101.
Jang S, Eom HJ, Lee KD, Choi WM, Choi YL, Kang HW, et al. Validation of a questionnaire that surveys confidence in sports among Korean competitive athletes. Journal of Men’s Health. 2018; 14(2): e30–e41.
O’Sullivan DM, Zuckerman M, Kraft M. Personality characteristics of male and female participants in team sports. Personality and Individual Differences. 1998; 25: 119–128.
Kim KH, Kim EY, Kim JP, Choi CY. A study athletes’ nature and characteristics based on their sports activities. Journal of the Korean Physical Education Association for Girls and Women. 1999; 13: 259–275.
Kim BG, Kong S, Lim SK. The relationship between range of motion and muscle strength of the shoulder joint in professional baseball pitchers. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 17: 160–166.
Choi DH, Oh SM. A study on the relationship between the personality traits, grit and sport coping of injury experienced student athletes. The Korea Journal of Sport. 2022; 20: 695–713.
Panel E. Team Physician Consensus Statement. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2006; 500: 2031.
Ortenburger D, Wąsik J, Pavlova I, Mosler D. Anxiety level in context of chosen pro-health attitudes of male students during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Men’s Health. 2021; 17: 109–116.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to top