- Academic Editor
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Background: Previous studies reported that red cell
distribution width (RDW) was related to acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Endovascular
treatment (EVT) still faces a huge challenge: futile recanalization. The goal of
our study was to investigate the relationship between futile recanalization and
RDW in AIS patients receiving EVT. Methods: We retrospectively
identified 188 AIS individuals with anterior circulation occlusion throughout EVT
and obtained complete or near-total recanalization. The subjects were classified
into futile recanalization group by their 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS)
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide . Clinical trials have proved that endovascular treatment (EVT) improves functional outcomes for large arterial occlusion patients regardless of prior intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) [2, 3, 4]. The patient’s prognosis with similar characteristics may differ substantially. Indeed, futile recanalization, defined as poor clinical outcome despite early recanalization of an occluded artery, remains a significant challenge . It could be associated to microvascular injury, poor collateral circulation and brain autoregulation .
As the peripheral blood index, red cell distribution width (RDW) is well-known to be a risk marker for vessel wall injury and cardiovascular disease [7, 8]. Increased RDW correlates with increased risk for carotid atherosclerosis, which in turn promotes the incidence of stroke . High RDW was found to be related to unfavorable outcomes in AIS patients . So far, the relationship between poor outcome and RDW in AIS patients through complete recanalization remains unclear . Therefore, this work aims to study whether RDW could be a risk indicator for futile recanalization in AIS patients following EVT.
Between January 2018 and December 2021, we investigated 289 consecutive AIS patients treated with EVT alone or IVT with EVT at Taizhou People’s Hospital. After mechanical thrombectomy, the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scores of 2b–3 were determined as recanalization . A total of 211 patients were included in our cohort.
Inclusion criteria for patients
(1) Occlusion of a major anterior circulation artery, together with anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery first segment (MCA M1), MCA second segment (MCA M2), internal carotid artery (ICA), ICA terminus (ICA-T), (2) Age over 18 years, (3) The pretreatment modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2.
Exclusion criteria for patients
Patients were excluded who had an active internal hemorrhage, hematologic diseases or active bleeding indications, heart failure, cerebral aneurysm, recent cerebral hemorrhage, and intracranial tumor. We also excluded participants with insufficient clinical and follow-up information.
Upon admission, laboratory data of patients were acquired, including white blood cells (WBC), platelets (PLT), red blood cells (RBC), and red cell distribution width (RDW). Risk factors such as demographic characteristics, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), pre-existing comorbidities (such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease) as well as serum glucose and blood pressure were collected at baseline while onset to recanalization time (OTR) were documented at hospital records . Using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on head computed tomographic angiography (CTA), the extension of ischemic lesion was assessed . The neurological impairment proportion was estimated using the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score . According to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification, subtypes of stroke were determined .
CT scans were examined during the hospitalization, the therapy was changed if hemorrhagic transformation (HT) was observed . Through standardized telephone surveys, the follow-up data was gathered.
According to the mRS score at 3 months after EVT, the subjects were classified into the successful recanalization group (good prognosis, mRS score 0–2) and the futile recanalization group (poor prognosis, mRS score 3–6) [18, 19].
This study was approved by our hospital’s ethics committee, and informed consent requirement was waived owing to the retrospective nature.
The SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was applied to analyze the statistical
data in the present study, and p
Following excluding 23 patients, the present work had 188 subjects (Fig. 1),
with 70 median years old (IQR 60–77), while 39.4% were female patients. The
mean RDW value was 13.0
Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion.
|Variables||Total (n = 188)||Futile Recanalization (n = 111)||Successful Recanalization (n = 77)||p value|
|Age (median, IQR)||70 [60–77]||71 [64.5–77.5]||68 [52–75]||0.017|
|Females, n (%)||74 (39.4)||43 (38.7)||31 (40.3)||0.834|
|Current smoker, n (%)||34 (18.1)||16 (14.4)||18 (23.4)||0.116|
|Drinking, n (%)||28 (14.9)||15 (13.5)||13 (16.9)||0.523|
|Hypertension, n (%)||105 (55.9)||67 (60.4)||38 (49.4)||0.135|
|Diabetes mellitus, n (%)||30 (16.0)||20 (18.0)||10 (13.0)||0.354|
|Hyperlipidemia, n (%)||75 (39.9)||43 (38.7)||32 (41.6)||0.698|
|Coronary heart diseases, n (%)||20 (10.6)||13 (11.7)||7 (9.1)||0.567|
|Atrial fibrillation, n (%)||99 (52.7)||62 (55.9)||37 (48.1)||0.292|
|Previous stroke or TIA, n (%)||31 (16.5)||19 (17.1)||12 (15.6)||0.781|
|Clinical assessment on admission|
|systolic blood pressure (mean, SD)||143
|dyastolic blood pressure (mean, SD)||85
|Glucose, mmol/L, median (IQR)||7.0 [6.4–8.1]||7.0 [6.6–9.2]||6.8 [5.8–7.6]||0.011|
|NIHSS SCORE, median (IQR)||16 [10–19]||16 [14–20]||12 [8–16]|
|ASPECTS 8-10, n (%)||80 (42.6)||19 (17.1)||61 (79.2)|
|OTR time (min) (mean
|ICA, n (%)||66 (35.1)||43 (38.7)||23 (29.9)|
|ICA-T, n (%)||4 (2.1)||1 (0.9)||3 (3.9)|
|MCA M1, n (%)||86 (45.7)||53 (47.7)||33 (42.9)|
|MCA M2, n (%)||31 (16.5)||14 (12.6)||17 (22.1)|
|ACA, n (%)||1 (0.5)||0 (0.0)||1 (1.3)|
|Atherosclerotic, n (%)||78 (41.4)||48 (43.2)||30 (39.0)|
|Cardioembolic, n (%)||96 (51.2)||60 (54.1)||36 (46.8)|
|Undetermined or others, n (%)||14 (7.4)||3 (2.7)||11 (14.3)|
|WBC (mean, SD)||8.20
|Neutrophils (mean, SD)||6.43
|Lymphocytes (mean, SD)||1.01
|Monocytes (mean, SD)||0.39
|RBC (mean, SD)||4.41
|PLT (mean, SD)||166.5
|RDW (mean, SD)||13.0
|Prior IVT, n (%)||0.669|
|YES||47 (25.0)||29 (26.1)||18 (23.4)|
|NO||141 (75.0)||82 (73.9)||59 (76.6)|
|Hemorrhagic transformation, n (%)|
|YES||77 (41.0)||59 (53.2)||18 (23.4)|
|NO||111 (59.0)||52 (46.8)||59 (76.6)|
Age (p = 0.017), ASPECTS 8-10 (p
The binary logistic regression analyses included variables with a p
|Variables||OR||95% CI||p value|
|Systolic blood pressure||1.028||1.008–1.049||0.028||0.007|
As shown with ROC analysis (Fig. 2), the RDW was found as a respective predictor
of futile recanalization, having an AUC of 0.798 and an optimal cut-off value of
13.25 (specificity 87% and sensitivity 60%). Variables discovered through
regression analysis were incorporated into an integrated model. The combined
model had a significantly higher AUC compared with the RDW alone model (0.944
vs 0.798; p
ROC curve of RDW-combined, without RDW and RDW alone model.
The clinical impact of EVT in treating AIS patients has been documented; however, not all fully recanalized patients will be capable of achieving premorbid functionality. Futile recanalization eventually brings physical disability as well as broader pressure to stroke survivors. The prediction of recanalization is pivotal to select patients prior to EVT. In clinical settings, RDW is a readily available and easily assessed blood parameter. Several studies have linked higher RDW levels with ischemic stroke morbidity and mortality [21, 22, 23]. In addition, recent investigations have revealed the importance of RDW as a risk marker of long-term survival in AIS patients receiving IVT . In our prior study, we observed the association between RDW and the 1-year prognosis of anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients following EVT, yet, the respect to futile recanalization remains unclear.
This retrospective observational research showed that RDW could independently contributed to 3-month poor outcome. The model integrating RDW with other risk markers plays a significant role in determining unfavorable functional outcome in AIS patients with successful recanalization.
Different factors have been found to increase the risk of the stroke prognosis such as hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, inflammation, or alterations in brain perfusion [11, 25]. Abnormal elevated RDW indicates the damage of microcirculatory blood flow being implicated as a key pathological feature of stroke . This may account for its association with the severity of vascular lesions partially, which results in futile recanalization following EVT. The association of oxidation with RDW has also been found in an animal model . An imbalance between anti-oxygen implicated in ischemic stroke lesions and the oxygen-free radical production systems causes lipid peroxidative damage . The level of RDW was associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) level in a large population study, suggesting RDW’s fundamental function in increasing inflammatory stress . In turn, inflammation may influence erythrocyte deformability, erythrocyte circulatory half-life, and erythropoiesis, promoting anisocytosis and increasing RDW level . Interestingly, our study observed no statistical difference in WBC counts between two groups. The latent link of inflammation and oxidative stress with RDW may explain the results.
Consistent with our results, RDW in the futile recanalization group were significantly higher than in the successful recanalization group. In addition, the logistic regression analysis observed RDW as a risk indicator of poor prognosis in AIS patients following EVT. These findings support the notion that inflammation plays a central contributor to the stroke pathology and can influence the clinical prognosis .
According to ROC curves analysis, we found that the admission RDW had a significant prognostic ability of poor 3-month outcome, having an AUC of 0.798 and the optimal cut-off value of 13.25 (specificity 87% and sensitivity 60%). The primary novel creation was developing a model that combined the RDW with other risk factors. The integrated model outperformed the RDW-only model in terms of predictive value. It could be helpful to take RDW value into account during the preoperative evaluation.
This study was based on actual clinical practice, nevertheless, it has also some limitations. The retrospective single center data collection could have influenced the results, the discriminative value of RDW in terms of specificity and sensitivity was relatively low. Besides, no dynamic changes in RDW were seen, suggesting that the evolution of RDW values over time rather than at a single time, maybe more predictive of prognosis in patients after EVT.
In this study, we demonstrated that RDW is an independent indicator of futile recanalization in anterior circulation AIS patients following EVT. Further prospective longitudinal multicenter trials should be performed to corroborate these findings.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conceptualizing and designing the study—YL and ZW. Extracting, analyzing and interpreting the data, Tables and Figures—ZW. Drafting the manuscript—ZW. Critical revision of the manuscript—YL and ZW. Supervision—YL and ZW. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Jiangsu Taizhou People’s Hospital issued approval KY_2022_005_01. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, no written informed consent was obtained.
We thank all the participants in the study.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.