COVID-19, provoked by SARS-CoV-2, constitutes a global health issue with high rates of mortality. The presence of diabetes mellitus is associated with severe coronavirus COVID-19 as it is related to increased death rates in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Acute kidney injury is a frequent complication among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and is met with high morbidity and mortality. Here, we present a case of a diabetic patient with acute kidney injury, metformin-associated lactic acidosis, and COVID-19. Lactic acidosis is a relatively rare but noteworthy complication of metformin use. However, the combination of those life-threatening situations could prove fatal for the patients despite optimal medical care.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication among patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease COVID-19 and can rapidly progress to end-stage disease, or in some cases can be proved fatal and could be associated with in-hospital mortality. The incidence rate is high and some case series describe rates approaching 60% among hospitalized patients [1].
It is important to ask what we truly know about kidney involvement in COVID-19 and what still needs to be learned. In this case, the questions that should be answered are first, if patients who are taking metformin are more vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and if metabolic acidosis with AKI is in the majority of the cases a fatal condition.
A 70-year-old, nonsmoking woman with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was
transferred to the Emergency department (ED) with nausea, chest pain, and a 7-day
history of diarrhea. Her past medical history included arterial hypertension and
hypothyroidism. She had been taking metformin 1000 mg twice daily, a fixed
combination of angiotensin II receptor blocker with a thiazide diuretic
(olmesartan-hydrochlorothiazide), and levothyroxine 137
Upon first medical contact, the patient appeared confused and not well-oriented. Her blood pressure was 150/90 mmHg, the oxygen saturation was 95% on room air, her heart rate was 150 beats per minute and she was afebrile. The clinical examination revealed a diffusely tender abdomen. The electrocardiogram showed supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy.
The arterial blood gas (ABG) examination revealed a serious lactic acidosis. The
pH was 6.71 and the HCO
Laboratory examinations revealed that her serum creatinine was 8.5 mg/dL, urea
237 mg/dL, potassium was 7 mEq/L while the C reactive protein was 0.9 mg/L
(reference range
Laboratory parameter | Day 0 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Reference range | |
WBC (Κ/ |
17.36 | 13.8 | 8.87 | 4–10 | |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 8.5 | 8.3 | 8.2 | 11.8–17.8 | |
Hematocrit (%) | 28.5 | 25.6 | 24.2 | 37–47 | |
Platelets (Κ/ |
316 | 224 | 103 | 150–400 | |
Glucose (mg/dL) | 251 | 77 | 282 | 70–100 | |
Sodium (mEq/L) | 147 | 148 | 137 | 135–148 | |
Potassium (mEq/L) | 7 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 3.6–5.2 | |
Urea (mg/dL) | 237 | 124 | 119 | 15–50 | |
Creatinine (mg/dL) | 8.7 | 4.5 | 4 | 0.6–1 | |
Total protein (g/dL) | 7.2 | 6 | 5.9 | 6.4–8.2 | |
Albumin (g/dL) | 4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4–5 | |
Magnesium (mg/dL) | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.6–2.4 | |
Calcium (mg/dL) | 10.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 8.5–10.1 | |
Phosphate (mg/dL) | 11 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 2.5–4.9 | |
CRP (mg/L) | 0.9 | 15.6 | 215 | ||
hsTnI (ng/L) | 54.6 | 2356 | 8992 | ||
INR | 1.17 | 1.45 | 0.8–1.2 | ||
D-dimers ( |
1.5 | ||||
Arterial Blood Gas analysis | |||||
pΗ | 6.71 | 7.28 | 7.29 | 7.35–7.45 | |
pCO |
15 | 30 | 38 | 35–45 | |
PO |
94 | 54 | 96 | 80–100 | |
HCO |
0 | 19 | 22 | 22–26 | |
Lactate (mmol/L) | 15.7 | 6 | 3 | ||
Anion gap (mEq/L) | 30 | 19 | 9 | 8–12 | |
WBC, white blood cells; CRP, C reactive protein; hsTnI, high sensitivity troponin I; INR, international normalized ratio. |
Due to the severity of her metabolic acidosis paired with the life-threatening
hyperkalemia, she was given bicarbonate and calcium gluconate infusions. The rest
of her in-hospital medical therapy consisted of normal saline (1 liter per day),
levothyroxine (137
The patient fulfilled the Extracorporeal Treatment in Poisoning (EXTRIP) Workgroup criteria for renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation in metformin poisoning [2] and was transferred immediately to the hemodialysis (HD) unit. A temporal central venous hemodialysis catheter was placed and she underwent an HD session (Fig. 1). During the session, she developed hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors. Consequently, the patient underwent a second hemodialysis session 6 hours later for the expected rebound of MALA due to metformin accumulation in peripheral tissues and erythrocytes [3].
Timeline of the patient’s clinical course. ECG, electrocardiogram; CXR, chest X-ray; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; ABG, arterial blood gas; AKI, acute kidney injury; IV, intravenous; HD, hemodialysis; CVC, central venous catheter insertion; CT, computed tomography; LLL, left lower lobe; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
During the 2nd day of hospitalization, she developed dyspnea of sudden onset with bilateral crackles and wheezing while the oxygen saturation had dropped to 80%. A repeat biochemical examination revealed leukocytosis and increased levels of inflammatory markers (C reactive protein: 215 mg/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 103 mm/h).
Differential diagnosis included acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute
pulmonary edema in the context of a new-onset respiratory infection. A chest and
abdominal CT scan were ordered which demonstrated a small area of ground glass
pattern at the right lower lobe. Even though the acidosis had largely improved
(pH = 7.28), the ABGs revealed type I respiratory failure (PaO
COVID-19, provoked by SARS-CoV-2, constitutes a global health issue with high rates of mortality [4, 5, 6]. According to the World Health Organization COVID-19 dashboard, until 25 May 2021, there have been 167.011.807 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 3.472.068 deaths. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus (DM) are associated with severe COVID-19 as they double the death rate and are increasingly prevalent in patients admitted to the intensive care unit [7, 8], with the upregulation of angiotensin converting enzyme-2 receptors in DM being a possible explanation for this interaction [9]. Adequate glycemic control is an additional critical factor influencing the prognosis of patients with DM and COVID-19 [10], who are already at an increased risk of ICU admission and death [11], since hyperglycemia, as detected in our patient at the day of admission, has been associated with poorer outcomes and a greater resistance to anti-interleukin-6 treatment [12, 13]. Hyperglycemia during or after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has also been related to an inadequate immune response, pointing towards a strict glycemic control in this specific time period [14].
Our patient presented with severe AKI secondary to COVID-19, with no previous evidence of kidney disease despite the presence of diabetes mellitus. However, DM is an independent predictor of AKI, a serious complication leading to increased morbidity and mortality [15]. Mechanisms of AKI in COVID-19 included but are not limited to direct viral kidney injury (endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, coagulopathy) or an indirect effect via fluid imbalance or drug nephrotoxicity [16]. The role of the cytokine storm and incident endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 pathophysiology and complications is critical has been well-established [17, 18, 19, 20], while the presence of comorbidities associated with pre-existing impaired endothelial function (age, arterial hypertension, cardiovascular disease) might be an aggravating factor contributing to renal complications [21, 22].
Metformin is the cornerstone of treatment and one of the most prescribed drugs
in diabetic patients [23, 24]. Some studies have examined the potential benefits
of metformin in COVID-19 patients, with encouraging results (Table 2, Ref.
[25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34]). According to the study of Bramante et al. [25] which included
6256 patients, metformin use was associated with lower mortality in patients and
especially obese or diabetic women hospitalized with COVID-19 by lowering tumor
necrosis factor-
Authors | Country | Number of patients | Result |
Bramante et al. [25] | USA | 6256 | Decreased in-hospital death, especially in women |
Luo et al. [27] | China | 283 | Decreased in-hospital death |
Chen et al. [26] | China | 120 | No significant effect on duration of hospitalization, prognosis, in-hospital death |
Cariou et al. [28] | France | 1317 | Lower death rate in day 7 in metformin users vs. no-users |
Ghany et al. [29] | USA | 1139 | Lower mortality, rate of hospitalization and ARDS among metformin users especially obese |
Li et al. [30] | China | 131 | Lower mortality rates for metformin users and in acarbose alone or in combination with metformin |
Cheng et al. [31] | China | 407 | Lower intensive care unit admission in pre admission metformin usage |
Wargny et al. [32] | France | 2796 | Metformin is a prognostic factor for hospital discharge and freedom from death |
Crouse et al. [33] | USA | 604 | Reduced risk of mortality |
Cheng et al. [34] | China | 15451 | Increased incidence of acidosis, reduced heart failure |
USA, United States of America; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome. |
Despite its beneficial action, lactic acidosis is considered a quite rare, potentially life-threatening complication with a mortality rate exceeding 50% in several studies [35, 36]. It is believed that 0 to 138 per 100,000 patients will develop MALA and this percentage may be increasing following the augmented prevalence of DM [35, 36].
MALA is characterized by: (a) pH lower than 7.35, (b) lactic acid
Based on a systematic review of MALA cases, the majority of the patients were exposed to other independent factors for lactic acidosis [38]. Usually, patients with MALA exhibit many life-threatening comorbidities such as sepsis and kidney injury that lead to devastating outcomes [39]. In our patient, COVID-19 precipitated the acute renal impairment, further facilitating the incidence of MALA. In a retrospective study including 1213 individuals with COVID-19 and T2DM, metformin was associated with a high incidence of acidosis but not mortality [34]. The results of this study encourage continuing the usage of metformin but in severe cases of COVID-19 patients have to be monitored closely to avoid lactic acidosis and kidney dysfunction [34, 40]. In severe forms of COVID-19 serious gastrointestinal symptoms, hypoxia, or multiple organ dysfunction, metformin use is not indicated owing to the risk of lactic acidosis [8, 41]. However, as demonstrated in our patient initially the pulmonary infiltrates were limited, without suspicious symptomatology.
MALA treatment generally revolves around RRT to correct the underlying metabolic
acidosis while also removing excess metformin [42]. Despite the very low quality
of the available evidence, comprising mostly of case reports, the EXTRIP
workgroup recommends RRT initiation in severe metformin poisoning cases (lactate
Lactic acidosis is a relatively rare but noteworthy complication of metformin use since it is associated with high rates of mortality. The prompt recognition of this medical condition is of paramount importance, in the era of COVID-19, since delays in its diagnosis and management could end up being fatal. RRT is the mainstay of treatment to correct the underlying metabolic acidosis while also removing excess metformin.
Metformin use is associated with favorable outcomes in COVID-19 according to published studies. However, appropriate medical care should be provided to patients who develop AKI, a frequent COVID-19 complication associated with a worse prognosis. Therefore emphasis should be given towards metformin discontinuation in cases of abdominal pain and repeated diarrhea which are frequent atypical symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, intending to avoid incident catastrophic side effects such as MALA. Future research should further investigate the importance of AKI with co-existing acidosis with regards to prognosis in COVID-19.
AV and PT contributed to the design of the work, drafted the manuscript, and gave final approval of the version published. GV, MK and RGK contributed to the design of the work, critically revised the manuscript, and gave final approval of the version published.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s next-of-kin for publication of this case report.
Not applicable.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.