IMR Press / FBL / Volume 27 / Issue 9 / DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2709268
Open Access Original Research
Evaluation of Efficacy of Oil Adjuvanted H5N6 Inactivated Vaccine against Highly Pathogenic H5N6 and H5N1 Influenza Viruses Infected Chickens
Show Less
1 Laboratory of Influenza Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, 34134 Yuseong Gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
2 Institute of Influenza Virus, Chungnam National University, Yuseong Gu, 34134 Daejeon, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence: seos@cnu.ac.kr (Sang Heui Seo)
These authors contributed equally.
Academic Editor: Graham Pawelec
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2022, 27(9), 268; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2709268
Submitted: 24 June 2022 | Revised: 5 August 2022 | Accepted: 31 August 2022 | Published: 28 September 2022
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Over the last 20 years, circulating highly pathogenic (HP) Asian H5 subtype avian influenza viruses have caused global pandemics in poultry and sporadic infections in humans. Vaccines are a desirable solution to prevent viral infections in poultry and reduce transmission to humans. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of an oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine against highly pathogenic H5N6 and H5N1 influenza virus infections in chickens. Methods: The polybasic amino acid cleavage site depleted HA gene and NA gene of A/Waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade 2.3.4.4) (H5N6) was assembled with the rest of the A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) genes to construct the vaccine virus. The vaccine virus was propagated in fertilized eggs, partially purified using a tangential flow filtration (TFF) system, and inactivated using formalin. The chickens were intramuscularly immunized with 384 HA, 192HA, and 96HA units of oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine. Antibody titer, survival rate, and lung pathology were evaluated against the homologous H5N6: A/waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade 2.3.4.4) and heterologous H5N1: A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (clade 1) viruses 12 and 4 weeks post-vaccination (p.v.), respectively. Data were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The 384HA (n = 10) and 192HA (n = 5) antigen-immunized chickens showed 100% survival after lethal infections with homologous H5N6, and no virus shedding was observed from tracheal and cloacal routes. All chickens that received the 384HA vaccine survived the challenge of heterologous H5N1 after 4 weeks of immunization. The chickens that received the 384HA vaccine showed mean HI titers of 60 and 240 after 12 and 4 weeks of vaccination, respectively, against HP H5N6, whereas a mean HI titer of 80 was observed in sera collected 4 weeks after vaccination against HP H5N1. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that one dose of 384HA oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine can induce a long-lasting immune response against both homologous H5N6 and heterologous H5N1 infections in chickens.

Keywords
inactivated vaccine
highly pathogenic influenza virus
H5N6
cross-clade immunity
1. Introduction

Avian influenza viruses (AIVs) are major viral pathogens that cause sporadic outbreaks in poultry. Aquatic birds, including wild waterfowl, have been identified as the primary reservoirs of influenza A viruses. However, these virus infections are also transmitted to other avian hosts and mammals, including humans [1]. All AIVs are categorized as influenza type A viruses and belong to the family Orthomyxoviridae. The avian influenza virion has eight segments of negative-sense, single-stranded RNA [2, 3]. The cleavage site of hemagglutinin (HA) is a critical determinant of influenza virus virulence. AIV Subtypes H5 and H7 underwent intermittent mutations in HA, acquiring a polybasic amino acid moiety containing arginine (R) and lysine (K) in the HA cleavage site. As a result, low-pathogenic AIVs were converted into highly pathogenic AIVs in poultry [4, 5, 6].

In 1996, H5N1 HP infection was detected in a domestic goose in Guangdong China (Gs/Gd lineage), and it later developed into a panzootic disease, causing drastic death rates among wild birds, poultry, and humans, and invading four continents [7, 8]. Since 2008, the evolution of the HA backbone of the H5N1 Gs/Gd lineage and the neuraminidase (NA) gene of low-pathogenic AIVs has led to the development of novel H5 HP avian influenza viruses. In early 2014, widespread infection by the novel HP avian influenza H5N6 subclade 2.3.4.4 was seen in China, Laos PDR, and Vietnam [9] and caused high death rates in poultry. Moreover, it had higher virulence than the previously reported H5N8 subtype, and the H5N6 virus crossed from poultry to humans, causing 17 human infections and seven deaths in China in mid-2017 [10]. In late 2016, HP H5N6 was first reported in migratory avian and subsequently spread to the domestic poultry population, causing a devastating outbreak in South Korea [11, 12].

Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza viruses are salient viral pathogens that cause recurrent epidemics in poultry and mammals, including humans. Since 2003, there have been several reports of HP H5N1 infections in humans with a mortality rate of over 50% [13], which increases the risk of recurring pandemics. The continuous presence of HP H5N6 and H5N1 viruses in bird reservoirs poses a serious threat to the public. Therefore, the establishment of effective protective measures is imperative for a rapid response to the emergence of pandemic strains.

A majority of epizootic diseases caused by influenza viruses have been restrained through stamping-out programs. However, vaccines are currently considered a surrogate solution for the protection of poultry from HP influenza virus infections and the prevention of transmission of the virus to humans. Numerous attempts have been made to develop vaccines against the HP H5 subtype viruses for use in poultry, and their cross-reactivity has also been evaluated against the H5N6 influenza virus [14, 15].

The effectiveness of the vaccine against H5 HP influenza virus infections seems to depend on the high homology between HA and NA antigenic factors. Therefore, recombinant vaccines have been developed through engineering HA and/or NA antigens from HP influenza viruses with the primary influenza virus PR8–H1N1. Depletion of the polybasic amino acid motifs of HA in highly pathogenic influenza viruses is one of the strategies practiced on a laboratory scale and has shown a remarkable immune response in the short-term [14, 16]. However, a vaccine that is effective against both HP H5N6 and HP H5N1 is lacking.

Therefore, we developed an inactivated vaccine with an oil adjuvant by depleting the polybasic amino acid cleavage site of the HP H5N6 influenza virus. We evaluated the efficacy and long-term immune response triggered by the vaccine against homologous HP H5N6 virus infection and the effectiveness of the vaccine against heterologous HP H5N1 virus infection.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Viruses and Animals

Healthy fertilized White Leghorn eggs were purchased from a local farm in Korea and hatched in our laboratory. Chickens aged 4 weeks were used in the immunization experiments. Immunized chickens (384HA, 192HA and 96HA) were housed separately in cages arranged in the animal center of Chungnam National University. The chickens were moved to a Biosafety Level-3 (BSL-3) poultry isolator to perform the challenge study with HP H5N6 and HP H5N1 viruses, and each group of infected chickens was housed separately in a poultry isolator during the study period.

HP H5N6; A/Waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade 2.3.4.4) was isolated in our laboratory from the feces of wild birds and was used as a seed strain for vaccine development and homologous virus challenge studies. Dr. Malik Peiris of the University of Hong Kong kindly provided the HP H5N1 A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (clade 1) virus. Virus strains were propagated in the allantoic fluid of 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs at 37 °C for 72 h.

All experiments related to highly pathogenic influenza viruses were conducted in BSL-3 facility certified by the Korean government.

2.2 Generation of Reassorted H5N6 Vaccine Virus

A reassorted virus was generated using a plasmid-based reverse genetic system, as described by Hwang et al. [16]. Briefly, RNA was extracted from A/Waterfowl/Korea/s57/2016 (H5N6) cells using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). The gene sequence of HA, which encodes a polybasic amino acid cleavage site, was deleted using overlapping primer PCR. The polybasic amino acid-depleted HA of H5N6 and NA of H5N6 were cloned into the pHW 2000 vector. PB2, PB1, PA, NP, M, and NS plasmids of A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8) (H1N1) were kindly provided by Dr. Robert Webster of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. One microgram of each plasmid was introduced into Vero cells at 80% confluency in 6-well cell culture plates, and then the Vero cells were transfected for 48 h. The cell supernatant (300 μL) was treated with L-1-tosylamido- 2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-trypsin (1 μg/mL) and inoculated into the allantoic cavity of 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs. The reassorted viruses were validated through genetic analysis, and the viral titer was determined using a hemagglutination assay (HA).

2.3 Preparation of the Inactivated Vaccine

The H5N6 vaccine virus was propagated in 10-day-old embryonated eggs (37 °C). The allantoic fluid was harvested 72 h post-inoculation and centrifuged at 14,981 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove the cell debris. The harvested fluid was filtered using 0.45-μm and 0.22-μm bottle top vacuum membrane filters (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). The clarified vaccine virus was concentrated to 1/10th (v/v) of the original volume using a tangential flow filtration (TFF) system (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA). The virus was inactivated by incubating with 0.02% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h at 4 °C. Diafiltration of the vaccine virus with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.40) was performed using the TFF system.

Complete inactivation of the vaccine virus was confirmed by inoculating the vaccine virus into the allantoic fluid of 10-day-old embryonated eggs, followed by the hemagglutination (HA) assay using 0.5% Turkish erythrocytes.

2.4 Immunization of Chickens Using Inactivated H5N6 Vaccine and Challenge with HP H5N6 and H5N1 Influenza Viruses

The inactivated vaccine virus (antigen) titer was determined using an HA assay with 0.5% turkey blood. Antigen doses were selected based on the HA units. The 384HA, 192HA, and 96HA units of antigen-containing solutions were prepared using PBS (pH = 7.40). The oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine was formulated by mixing 30% antigens diluted in PBS and 70% oil adjuvant (Montanide ISA 70 VG, SEPPIC Co., Puteaux, France). Three groups of 4-week-old chickens (n = 10) were immunized intramuscularly (i.m.) using 500 μL of the vaccine formulation containing three inactivated H5N6 antigen doses of 384 HA, 192HA, and 96HA units. Further, 10, 5, and 5 chickens were immunized i.m. using 384HA, 192HA, and 96HA vaccines. Unimmunized chickens (n = 1 per group) were used as a negative control.

To determine the long-term efficacy of an immune response elicited by the vaccine against homologous virus infections, each group of immunized chickens (384HA (n = 10), 192HA (n = 5), and 96HA (n = 5)) was intranasally (i.n.) challenged using 1 mL of 100 TCID50/mL of A/Waterfowl/Korea/s57/2016 (H5N6) (clade 2.3.4.4) after 12 weeks of vaccination. To evaluate the cross-clade protective immunity of the inactivated H5N6 vaccine, 384HA inactivated H5N6 antigens containing vaccine immunized chickens (n = 4) were i.n. challenged with 1 mL of 100 TCID50/mL of A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) (clade 1) 4 weeks after vaccination. Five unimmunized chickens infected with 1 mL of 100 TCID50/mL of A/Waterfowl/Korea/s57/2016 (H5N6) (clade 2.3.4.4) and 4 unimmunized chickens i.n. infected with 1 mL of 100 TCID50/mL of A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) (clade 1) were maintained as positive controls with each virus challenge group simultaneously.

To further examine the effectiveness of the 96HA vaccine, we infected five chickens that had received two doses of the 96HA H5N6 vaccine with 1 mL of 100 TCID50/mL of HP H5N6 virus after 12 weeks of vaccination. A separate group of unimmunized chickens (n = 3) i.n. infected with1 mL of TCID50/mL of HP H5N6 homologous virus was used as a control.

2.5 Determination of Antibody Titer in Immunized Chickens Using the Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Assay

Blood was collected from chickens in each vaccinated group at 2-week intervals two weeks after immunization. Sera were extracted from each blood sample and heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min. An HI assay was performed to determine the antibody titer in chickens against homologous HP H5N6 and heterologous HP H5N1 virus infections. Briefly, sera were diluted 10-fold before performing 2-fold serial dilutions in PBS (pH 7.40) in V-bottom 96-well plates. Eight hemagglutination (HA) units (25 μL) of H5N6 virus were added and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Then, 50 μL of 0.5% Turkey’s red blood cells were added, followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature. HI titers were calculated as the reciprocal of the dilution factor that showed complete inhibition of hemagglutination.

2.6 Determination of Viral Titer in Trachea and Cloacae Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT qPCR)

The trachea and cloacae of surviving chickens were swabbed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days post infection (p.i.). Tracheal and cloacal swab samples were collected in 250 μL and 500 μL PBS (pH 7.40) (per sample), respectively. The swab samples were homogenized through vortexing and filtered using a 0.22-μm Ministart syringe filter (Sartorius Stedium Biotech GmbH, Goettingen, Germany).

Viral RNA was extracted from tracheal and cloacal swab samples of immunized and unimmunized chickens challenged with HP H5N6 or HP H5N1, which were collected on day 3 p.i. using a HiGeneTM Viral RNA/DNA prep kit (column type) (BIOFACT Co., Ltd., South Korea). Briefly, 250 μL of VL buffer and 20 μL of proteinase K were added to 150 μL of each tracheal or cloacal sample collected on day three p.i. The samples were then vortexed for 1 min and incubated at room temperature for 10 min before 350 μL of 100% ethanol was added to each sample. The lysate/ethanol mixture was transferred to a capsule column and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min. The column was washed with 500 μL of VW1 buffer which was followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 1 min. Five hundred microliters of 100% ethyl alcohol were washed twice followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 1 min. RNA was eluted using 30 μL of nuclease-free water.

To detect the virus, real-time quantitative fluorescent PCR was performed using the TOPrealTM one-step RT qPCR kit (TaqMan probe) (Enzynomics, Daejeon, South Korea) and H5 influenza primers and probes. A total of 20 μL of PCR reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 5 μL of TOPrealTM one-step RT qPCR kit (TaqMan probe), 1 μL of 10 pmol of each primer (H5 1504 Forward, 5-ACA TAT GAC TAC CCA CAR TAT TCA G – 3, H5 1655 Reverse; 5- AGA CCA GCT AYC ATG ATT GC-3), 1 μL of H5 probe (5-FAM-TCW ACA GTG GCG AGT TCC CTA GCA-TAMRA-3), 10 μL of template RNA, and 2 μL of nuclease-free water. RNA was amplified in a Rotor-Gene 6000 system (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) using the RT qPCR cycle with reverse transcription at 50 °C for 30 min, initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, annealing, and elongation at 60 °C for 30 s. A standard curve for H5 influenza virus was generated using the plaque assay data of stock viruses.

2.7 Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Lung Tissues

To determine tissue histopathology, on day 6 p.i., lung and tracheal tissues were collected from immunized chickens challenged with HP H5N6 or HP H5N1 viruses. Tissues from HP H5N6 infected unimmunized chickens and HP H5N1 infected unimmunized chickens were obtained on days 1 and 3 p.i., respectively. The tissues were immersed in phosphate-buffered formalin (10%) (Triangle Biomedical Sciences, Durham, USA) and fixed for 6 h while shaking. The tissues were then washed under running tap water and embedded in paraffin. Tissues were prepared into 5-μm sections. The sections were stained with Harris hematoxylin (H) for 1 min and counterstained with 1% eosin Y solution (E) for 1 min. The stained tissue sections were preserved using Canada balsam, observed under an Olympus DP70 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and photographed.

2.8 Statistical Analysis

Experimental data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and multiple t-tests in GraphPad Prism software (Version 8.0.1) (GraphPad software. Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical p-values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were considered significant.

3. Results
3.1 Survival of Chickens Immunized with Oil-Adjuvanted Inactivated H5N6 Vaccine

Chickens immunized with a single dose of the 384HA, 192HA, and 96HA vaccines and two doses of the 96HA vaccine were challenged with homologous HP H5N6 at 12 weeks p.v. Survival of chickens was observed up to 14 days p.i. The 384HA- or 192HA-immunized chickens exhibited 100% survival rate, while survival of the 96HA vaccinated chickens dropped to 20% on day 6 p.i. and remained constant until day 14 p.i. Chickens that received two doses of the 96HA vaccine also showed 100% survival up to 14 days p.i. When unimmunized chickens were infected with the homologous HP H5N6 virus, all chickens (n = 5) died within two days of infection (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Survival Rate of immunized chickens after the challenge. Immunized chickens were intranasally infected with 100 TCID50/mL of homologous A/waterfowl/Korea/s57/2016 (H5N6) (clade 2.3.4.4) or heterologous A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) (clade 1) viruses. Survival was observed until 14 days after infection. (A) Survival rates of chickens challenged with the homologous H5N6 virus. (B) Survival rate of chickens challenged with the heterologous H5N1 virus.

Interestingly, all chickens immunized with the 384HA oil-adjuvanted inactivated vaccine and infected with heterologous HP H5N1 virus (n = 4) four weeks p.v. survived throughout the 14 days of observation. All unimmunized chickens infected with heterologous HP H5N1 (n = 4) survived until day 6 p.i. (Fig. 1B).

3.2 Antibody Titers of Immunized Chickens

Sera were extracted from blood collected from the immunized chickens starting at 2 weeks p.v. up to 12 weeks p.v. The HI assay was performed to determine antibody titers in immunized chickens. The mean hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer was 240 against homologous HP H5N6 and 80 against heterologous HP H5N1 influenza virus (clade 1) 4 weeks p.v. in 384HA-vaccinated chickens (Fig. 2A,C).

Fig. 2.

Antibody titers in immunized chickens. 4-week-old chickens were injected with 500 μL of 384HA units of oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine into the pectoral muscle. 2 weeks after vaccination, sera were collected from chickens for 12 weeks. Antibody titers in the sera were determined using the HI assay. (A) Mean HI titers in sera of vaccinated chickens 4 weeks after immunization against HP H5N6 (clade 2.3.4.4) and HP H5N1 (clade 1) viruses. (B) Mean HI titer of 384HA vaccinated chickens up to 12 weeks p.v. against HP H5N6 (clade 2.3.4.4). (C) Individual antibody titers of 192HA and 96HA vaccine-immunized chickens at week 12 p.v. against HP H5N6 (clade 2.3.4.4) infection. Data are presented as mean titers of vaccinated chickens ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05. The limit of detection was 10HI.

The mean HI titer peaked 6 weeks after vaccination and was reported to be 156 against homologous HP H5N6 infection. The vaccinated chickens showed a mean HI titer of 60 against A/waterfowl/Korea/s57/2016 (H5N6) at 12 weeks p.v., which was significantly higher than the HI titers in unimmunized chickens (Fig. 2B).

3.3 Determination of Viral Titer in Swabs Samples of Immunized Chickens

To determine the viral titer, the trachea and cloacae of surviving chickens were swabbed on day 3 p.i. No virus was detected in the tracheal and cloacal samples of 384HA-,192HA-, and 96HA-vaccinated chickens that were challenged with the homologous H5N6 virus (Fig. 3A). Cloacal and tracheal swabs from chickens vaccinated with two doses of the 96HA vaccine and challenged with HP H5N6 virus did not show any viral titers. However, unimmunized chickens exposed to HP H5N6 showed a significantly high viral titer of (411.9 PFU/mL) in the trachea on day 1 p.i. and no viruses were shed through the cloacae 1 day p.i. (Supplementary Fig. 1). We could not measure the viral titer of unimmunized chickens in subsequent days since they died 2 days p.i. Interestingly, no virus was detected in tracheal and cloacal swabs when the 384HA vaccine was administered to chickens infected with HP H5N1, while HP H5N1 infected unimmunized chickens showed significantly higher viral titers in the cloacal (Log10 4.09 PFU/mL, p < 0.0001) and tracheal (Log10 5.06 PFU/mL, p < 0.0001) swabs (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Viral titers in tracheal and cloacal swabs of vaccinated chickens after challenge with HP H5N6 or HP H5N1 viruses. Tracheal and cloacal swabs were collected in PBS on day 3 p.i. from chickens that received the vaccine and were challenged with HP H5N6 A/Waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade 2.3.4.4) and HP H5N1 A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (clade 1) viruses. RNA was extracted from the swab samples, and RT qPCR was performed using H5 influenza primers and probes. (A) Viral titers of immunized chickens challenged with HP H5N6 (clade 2.3.4.4) (384HA; n = 10, 192HA; n = 5, and 96HA; n = 4). (B) Viral titers in immunized chickens challenged with HP H5N1 (clade 1) (n = 4). Unimmunized chickens infected with HP H5N6 homologous virus (n = 5) and unimmunized chickens infected with HP H5N1 heterologous virus (n = 4) were used as controls. Data are represented as Log10 plaque forming units (PFU)/mL of viral titers in vaccinated chickens ± standard deviation. **** p < 0.0001. The limit of detection was 2.2 Log10 PFU/mL.

3.4 Histopathology of Lung Tissues

None of the 384HA-immunized chickens that were infected with homologous HP H5N6 virus exhibited signs of pneumonia in the lung tissue (Fig. 4A). However, lung tissues of 192HA- and 96HA-vaccinated chickens that were challenged with homologous HP H5N6 virus showed symptoms of mild pneumonia (Fig. 4B,C) when compared with the lung tissues of only HP H5N6 infected chickens, which showed signs of severe pneumonia (Fig. 4D). When 384HA-immunized chickens were infected with the HP H5N1virus, their lung tissues showed mild pneumonia (Fig. 5A) compared to the lung tissues of HP H5N1-infected, unimmunized chickens, which showed signs of severe pneumonia (Fig. 5B). The lung tissues of unimmunized and non-infected chickens did not show any signs of pneumonia (Figs. 4E,5C).

Fig. 4.

Pathology of lung tissues of immunized chickens challenged with HP H5N6: A/Waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade2.3.4.4). (A) Lung tissue from 384HA-immunized chicken. (B) Lung tissue from 192HA-immunized chicken. (C) Lung tissue from 96HA-immunized chicken. (D) Lung tissue from HP H5N6-challenged, unimmunized chicken. (E) Uninfected chicken lung tissue.

Fig. 5.

Pathology of lung tissues of immunized chickens challenged with HP H5N1: A/ Hong Kong/213/2003 (clade 1). (A) Lung tissue from 384HA-immunized chicken. (B) Lung tissue from H5N1 infected unimmunized chicken. (C) Uninfected chicken lung tissue.

4. Discussion

Over the last 20 years, circulating highly pathogenic H5 subtype avian influenza viruses have caused global outbreaks in poultry populations and sporadic infections in humans. Hence, the development of a vaccine with long-term effectiveness against these virus infections is crucial not only to minimize economic losses in the poultry industry but also to decrease the magnitude of infection by reducing viral shedding into the environment. In this study, we found that an oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine containing 384HA units could induce sterile immunity in chickens against homologous HP H5N6 A/Waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade 2.3.4.4) up to 12 weeks after vaccination and cross-clade immunity against A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) (clade 1) infection.

Our results demonstrate that a prime boost with 384HA units of oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine could completely protect chickens from homologous H5N6 virus, A/Waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade 2.3.4.4) infection after 12 weeks of vaccination. Even though inactivated vaccines require several boosters to activate protective immunity, one dose of the vaccine developed herein could elicit an immune response in chickens for as long as 12 weeks, with a mean HI titer of 60. This demonstrates that our vaccine can effectively provide sterile immunity in chickens, even with prime boosting. Moreover, the H5N6 vaccine elicited humoral immunity, which was higher than the protective immunity level of 1:40 HI. A previous study on an inactivated vaccine prepared using HA and NA antigens of H5N1 (A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1) (clade 1) showed a mean HI titer of 147 for homologous viruses 12 weeks p.v. [16]. This difference in mean HI titers could be due to the level of vaccine purity. The assorted H5N1 vaccine used in the study by Hwang et al. [16] was completely purified and the HA protein content was measured in μg, while our vaccine was partially purified and used HA units of antigens for vaccination.

Our vaccine provided cross-clade immunity against A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) (clade 1) in immunized chickens 4 weeks after vaccination. A previous study also showed that a vaccine containing H5N1 antigens (clade 1) is effective in immunizing chickens against heterologous challenges (clade 2.3.4) when vaccinated with 5.0 μg of HA antigens [16]. Another study conducted using mice and ferrets also demonstrated the cross-protective immunity elicited by H5N1 based vaccines [17, 18]. The high cross-clade immune activity of our vaccine may be caused by its ability to induce the production of antibodies targeting the stalk region of the HA protein (HA2). We analyzed the similarities between the amino acid sequences of the HA proteins in HP H5N1 and H5N6 viruses. The HA proteins in HP H5N1 and H5N6 viruses showed 92.6% amino acid sequence similarity, while the HA2 proteins in the two viruses showed 98.6% amino acid sequence similarity (Supplementary Figs. 2,3).

Infections by highly pathogenic H5Nx, including H5N6 and H5N1, have been reported to cause severe disease symptoms and 100% mortality within 2–3 days [19, 20, 21, 22]. However, 192HA vaccinated HP H5N6 homologous virus-infected and 384HA vaccinated HP H5N1 heterologous virus-infected chickens showed a 100% survival rate, even though chickens showed signs of mild pneumonia in lung tissues on day 6 p.i. Elevated levels of virus-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines in HP H5N6 and HP H5N1 infected chickens and other susceptible poultry could result in severe disease symptoms [21, 22, 23]. As reported previously, induced pro-inflammatory immune responses could be the reason for mild pneumonia in immunized chickens. Moreover, the 96HA vaccinated and HP H5N6 challenged chickens showed 80% mortality (Fig. 1A) and mild pneumonia in the lung tissues (Fig. 4C). However, no viral shedding was observed from either the trachea or cloacae on day 3 p.i. Disease severity and associated deaths could be due to the overexpression of inflammatory cytokines in the lung tissues and not due to the complications driven by increased viral replication in host organs.

In summary, a single dose of oil-adjuvanted inactivated H5N6 vaccine may be a potential solution for protecting poultry from recurring highly pathogenic H5 influenza virus infections.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings show that a prime boost of the 384HA H5N6 vaccine can completely protect chickens from lethal infection by HP H5N6, A/waterfowl/Korea/S57/2016 (clade 2.3.4.4) for long-term and is also effective against HP H5N1, A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) (clade 1) influenza infections.

Author Contributions

KAPPK and JYY performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. SHS contributed to the conceptualization, designing of the experimental work and provided help and advice on the experiment work and drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All animal experiments were approved by the Internal Animal Use Committee at Chungnam National University (CNU), Daejeon, Republic of Korea (Approval: 202012A-CNU-171). The experiments were performed according to the guidelines and regulations of CNU, Republic of Korea.

Acknowledgment

Veterinary students; Nam Chan Woo and Kim Yong Joo assisted in the housing and maintenance of the chickens used in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2019R1A2C2002166812).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Sang Heui Seo was serving as Guest Editor of this journal. We declare that Sang Heui Seo had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Graham Pawelec.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References
[1]
Yoon SW, Webby RJ, Webster RG. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Influenza Pathogenesis and Control. 2014; 1: 359–375.
[2]
Bouvier NM, Palese P. The biology of influenza viruses. Vaccine. 2008; 26: D49–D53.
[3]
Cheung TKW, Poon LLM. Biology of Influenza a Virus. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2007; 1102: 1–25.
[4]
Kawaoka Y, Nestorowicz A, Alexander DJ, Webster RG. Molecular analyses of the hemagglutinin genes of H5 influenza viruses: origin of a virulent turkey strain. Virology. 1987; 158: 218–227.
[5]
Mulatti P, Zecchin B, Monne I, Vieira JT, Dorotea T, Terregino C, et al. H7N7 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Poultry Farms in Italy in 2016. Avian Diseases. 2017; 61: 261–266.
[6]
Horimoto T, Ito T, Alexander DJ, Kawaoka Y. Cleavability of Hemagglutinin from an Extremely Virulent Strain of Avian Influenza Virus Containing a Unique Cleavage Site Sequence. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 1995; 57: 927–930.
[7]
Duan L, Bahl J, Smith GJD, Wang J, Vijaykrishna D, Zhang LJ, et al. The development and genetic diversity of H5N1 influenza virus in China, 1996–2006. Virology. 2008; 380: 243–254.
[8]
Duan L, Campitelli L, Fan XH, Leung YHC, Vijaykrishna D, Zhang JX, et al. Characterization of Low-Pathogenic H5 Subtype Influenza Viruses from Eurasia: Implications for the Origin of Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Viruses. Journal of Virology. 2007; 81: 7529–7539.
[9]
Swayne DE, Suarez DL, Spackman E, Jadhao S, Dauphin G, Kim-Torchetti M, et al. Antibody Titer has Positive Predictive Value for Vaccine Protection against Challenge with Natural Antigenic-Drift Variants of H5N1 High-Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Viruses from Indonesia. Journal of Virology. 2015; 89: 3746–3762.
[10]
Si Y, Lee IW, Kim E, Kim Y, Kwon H, Park S, et al. Genetic characterisation of novel, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N6 viruses isolated in birds, South Korea, November 2016. Euro Surveillance. 2017; 22: 30434.
[11]
OIE, Update on highly pathogenic avian influenza in animals (TYPE H5 and H7). 2016.
[12]
Lee E, Song B, Lee Y, Heo G, Bae Y, Joh S, et al. Multiple novel H5N6 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses, South Korea, 2016. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2017; 51: 21–23.
[13]
WHO. Influenza at the human-animal interface Summary and assessment, from 14 December 2021 to 21 January 2022. 2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/influenza-at-the-human-animal-interface-summary-and-assessment-15-april-2021 (Accessed: 22 May 2022).
[14]
Jin M, Jang Y, Seo T, Seo SH. Inactivated H5 antigens of H5N8 protect chickens from lethal infections by the highly pathogenic H5N8 and H5N6 avian influenza viruses. Journal of Veterinary Research. 2018; 62: 413–420.
[15]
Liu LQ, Zi LI, Ming JI, Jian LU, Zhou JF, Li XY, et al. Development and Assessment of Two Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N6 Candidate Vaccine Viruses for Pandemic Preparedness. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. 2020; 33: 670–679.
[16]
Hwang SD, Kim HS, Cho SW, Seo SH. Single dose of oil-adjuvanted inactivated vaccine protects chickens from lethal infections of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus. Vaccine. 2011; 29: 2178–2186.
[17]
Murakami S, Iwasa A, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Ito M, Kiso M, Kida H, et al. Cross-clade protective immunity of H5N1 influenza vaccines in a mouse model. Vaccine. 2008; 26: 6398–6404.
[18]
Forrest HL, Khalenkov AM, Govorkova EA, Kim J, Del Giudice G, Webster RG. Single- and multiple-clade influenza a H5N1 vaccines induce cross protection in ferrets. Vaccine. 2009; 27: 4187–4195.
[19]
Jeong O, Kim M, Kim M, Kang H, Kim H, Kim Y, et al. Experimental infection of chickens, ducks and quails with the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus. Journal of Veterinary Science. 2009; 10: 53–60.
[20]
Saito T, Watanabe C, Takemae N, Chaisingh A, Uchida Y, Buranathai C, et al. Pathogenicity of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of H5N1 subtype isolated in Thailand for different poultry species. Veterinary Microbiology. 2009; 133: 65–74.
[21]
Burggraaf S, Karpala AJ, Bingham J, Lowther S, Selleck P, Kimpton W, et al. H5N1 infection causes rapid mortality and high cytokine levels in chickens compared to ducks. Virus Research. 2014; 185: 23–31.
[22]
Bean AGD, Baker ML, Stewart CR, Cowled C, Deffrasnes C, Wang L, et al. Studying immunity to zoonotic diseases in the natural host — keeping it real. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2013; 13: 851–861.
[23]
Cornelissen JB, Vervelde L, Post J, Rebel JM. Differences in highly pathogenic avian influenza viral pathogenesis and associated early inflammatory response in chickens and ducks. Avian Patholology. 2013; 42: 347–364.
Share
Back to top