IMR Press / FBL / Volume 27 / Issue 8 / DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2708233
Open Access Original Research
Early Development Survival of Pelophylax Water Frog Progeny is Primarily Affected by Paternal Genomic Input
Show Less
1 Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics CAS, v. v. i., 27721 Libechov, Czech Republic
2 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 70103 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*Correspondence: dolezalkova@iapg.cas.cz (Marie Doležálková-Kaštánková); lukas.choleva@osu.cz (Lukáš Choleva)
Academic Editor: Woo-Sung Kwon
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2022, 27(8), 233; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2708233
Submitted: 21 April 2022 | Revised: 5 July 2022 | Accepted: 14 July 2022 | Published: 1 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reproductive technologies in male)
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Hybrid taxa exist in nature, but their fitness can vary greatly. Hybrids are usually thought to have lower viability and survival rate than parental species due to the occurrence of two different genomes and divergent evolution in each species. On the other hand, the hybrid vigour of the F1 generation may give hybrids an advantage in mixed populations where they have to live and compete with parental taxa. Post-zygotic selection with endogenous genetic mechanisms may be a significant evolutionary force in hybrid formation. Here we tested principles of post-zygotic reproductive dynamics in mixed populations of Pelophylax water frogs that would help us understand the origin and maintenance of such systems. Methods: Within experimental crosses, we combined various diploid Pelophylax genotypes resulting in 211 families. Statistical analysis of progeny was used to measure fertilization success, the rate of embryonic/tadpole mortality and the overall survival of the progeny till the time of metamorphosis. Using Generalized Estimating Equations models and variables defined by a mother/father included in mate pairs, we tested which factor best explains the successful embryonal development. Results: The development of Pelophylax offspring significantly varied in survival rate and morphological malformations. These post-zygotic reproductive dynamics were driven by parental combinations of species pairs. The best values in the proportion of developing eggs, embryos, tadpoles and overall survival showed progeny of homospecific P. lessonae crosses. Total survival rates were relatively similar between L-E and R-E population systems but much lower than homospecific crosses in parental taxa. However, once the early stages passed this period, tadpoles mostly of hybrid hemiclonal origin performed even better than pure P. ridibundus progeny. Hybrid × hybrid crosses showed the highest mortality values. Statistical testing revealed that high mortality affected paternal genetic input. Conclusions: Combined three water frog taxa and both sexes provided patterns of post-zygotic reproduction dynamics of early development in the widespread population systems in Central Europe. The results further showed high survival rates of hybrid F1s created de novo from parental species despite significant divergence between P. ridibundus and P. lessonae DNA. Potential conservation measures of sexual-asexual systems in natural populations are discussed.

Keywords
embryogenesis
mortality
asexual reproduction
hybridogenesis
hemiclonal
Pelophylax esculentus
1. Introduction

Hybrid taxa exist in nature, and some have developed into independent evolutionary units through homoploid hybrid speciation [1], while others remained reproductively dependent on their parental species [2]. Hybrids are usually thought to have lower viability and survival rate than parental species due to the occurrence of two different genomes and divergent evolution in each species [3]. However, hybrid fitness concerning the fitness of the parental taxa can vary greatly. Hybrid superiority caused by heterosis is the phenomenon in which hybrid traits of the F1 generation are better than the life-history traits of the parental taxa [4]. Hybrid vigour may give hybrids an advantage in mixed populations where they have to live and compete with parental taxa [2, 5, 6]. Here, post-zygotic selection may act as a significant evolutionary force in hybrid formation when pre-zygotic mechanisms that might prevent their formation in the first place are overcome [7, 8, 9].

For this post-zygotic selection, endogenous genetic mechanisms based on the occurrence of two different genomes from parents may impact early development survival rates [10]. Knowing these mechanisms would help us understand the origin and maintenance of animal systems in which hybrid asexual fish and amphibians live in sympatry with a sexual species. These animal systems are known to have dynamic reproduction in which various gametes are formed, and various genotypes originate [11, 12]. Most of them are, however, unfit. To reproduce, hybrids have to get a sexual gamete to trigger embryonic development from clonal diploid eggs (gynogenesis) or to reach a zygote through fertilization with a clonal haploid gamete referred to as hybridogenetic hemiclonal reproduction [13]. A study of larval development showed post-zygotic selection against parental genotypes to maintain all-hybrid populations of the frog Pelophylax esculentus [10]. Thus, opportunities to study the early stages of taxa forming sexual-asexual systems under controlled conditions may help us understand the possible influence of embryonic and larval variation development on the dynamics of a mixed population structure.

The European Pelophylax water frog is an optimal study system for these questions as it includes two sexual species P. lessonae (LL) and P. ridibundus (RR), and a sympatrically occurring interspecific hybrid, P. esculentus (RL). Hybrids use hybridogenesis, where a chromosomal set from one parent is eliminated from the germline while a second still complete chromosome set is transmitted clonally to gametes. To maintain a hybrid genotype in the population, male and female hybrids have to live with and mate with a parental species whose genome has been removed from the hybrid germline. The hybridogenetic mechanism maintains diploid P. esculentus in a permanent F1 hybrid constitution. Water frog populations vary in patterns of gamete production. The most common population system includes diploid hybrids of both sexes that cohabit with P. lessonae and produce clonal R gametes (the so-called L-E System). In contrast, those with P. ridibundus typically produce clonal L gametes in the R-E System [14, 15]. Detail studies of the latter in Central Europe showed that P. esculentus occurs in the male sex only, being even amphispermic. In this process, a single P. esculentus form two sperm cell types, a clonal haploid ridibundus (R sperm) and lessonae (L sperm) genomes [15, 16, 17].

In this study, we tested principles of post-zygotic reproductive dynamics in mixed populations including P. ridibundus, P. lessonae, and P. esculentus within 211 crossing experiments. In particular, we tested the following hypotheses. (1) Fertilization rates and survival rates depend on taxa included in crosses. (2) Post-zygotic developmental dynamics in mixed population systems are driven by individual parental genomic input and the sex of a parent; Pathways of reproductive mechanisms during early developmental stages may reveal how the sexual-asexual systems are maintained in nature.

2. Material and Methods
2.1 Sampling and DNA Extraction

Thirteen P. lessonae, 69 P. ridibundus and 83 P. esculentus males and females were collected at 23 sample sites (Supplementary Table 1). Frogs were taxon-determined by phenotypic characters [18, 19] (Fig. 1A–C). DNA was extracted from an interdigital forelegs membrane using a commercial Tissue DNA Isolation Kit (Geneaid Biotech, Taipei, Taiwan) following a manufacturer protocol.

Fig. 1.

Morphological variation (shape of the metatarsal tubercle, dorsal/lateral/ventral colouration) in three Pelophylax taxa and examples of early development in progeny. (A) P. ridibundus (RR). (B) P. lessonae (LL). (C) P. esculentus (RL). (D) Stages of regular early development in progeny from RR × RL crosses: (a) morula. (b) 2cell morula. (c) 4cell morula. (d) 8cell morula. (e–g) morula. (h) gastrula. (i) neurulation. (j,k) neurula. (l–n) larvae. (E) Variants of embryonic/larval malformations detected in RL × RR crosses: (a–d) unequal divisions during embryogenesis. (e–h) dying apoptotic embryos in later phases. (i–l) malformed neurulas/larvae.

The experimental procedures followed directives of the State Veterinary Administration of the Czech Republic under the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, permit number 34711/2010-30 issued by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Frogs were collected under permit no. 358/2011, 278/2011 provided by the Agency for Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection of the Czech Republic. The permits for the crossing experiments were obtained from the Swiss authorities (experimental permit 119/2013: TV 5113 and TH 103).

2.2 Crossing Experiments

To explore gamete production and early development in water frogs, we made 211 crosses, including 63 P. esculentus males from the R-E populations, six hybrid males and 14 females from the L-E populations, 22 P. ridibundus males and 47 females, eight P. lessonae males and five females. The schema of crossing design is given in Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2.

The artificial fertilization procedure followed the methodology from Berger et al. [20] with some modifications. Males were euthanized in a buffered (pH = 7.0) 2 mg/L MS-222 solution (Sigma A-5040, St. Gallen, Switzerland); their testes were removed and stored in a Petri dish with Holtfreter’s solution (pH = 7.4) before use. Females were triggered to ovulate by an injection of salmon luteinizing-releasing hormone (LHRH, Sigma L4897, Prague, Czech Republic). For this purpose, 2 mg of the hormone were diluted in 100 mL of Holtfreter’s solution; per 10 g of body mass, 0.1 mL of this solution was injected into the abdominal cavity. After 16–18 hours, ovulation was checked by pressing the female belly carefully between the thumb and the index finger of the left hand and opening the cloaca with curved forceps. Ovulation was indicated when some eggs were released from the cloaca. Females that did not ovulate received a second hormone injection.

Testes were sliced and crushed to release sperm in a new Petri dish containing aged tap water. Eggs from one female were gently stripped into the sperm solutions and covered with aged tap water. The fertilization success was indicated by egg rotation that turned the black animal pole to the top within 10–40 min after fertilization. On the second day, eggs were checked under a microscope for the presence of the fertilization membrane, indicating successful penetration of a sperm cell into the egg. All eggs were photographed and transferred to 1.5 L plastic boxes (20 × 12 × 7 cm), which contained 0.8 L of aged tap water. Unfertilized eggs, egg yolk, and aborted embryos were carefully removed on the third day of the experiment and repeated every second day to avoid bacterial and fungal infections causing embryonic mortality (EM). About 12 days later, when the embryos started to reach the free-swimming stage 25 [21], the boxes were photographed, and tadpoles were transferred to 500 L outdoor containers filled with pond water and steamed straw. Crosses with more than 70 tadpoles were evenly distributed into two containers to reduce inter-individual competition during development. Tadpole mortality (TM) was estimated from the number of tadpoles that died after stage 25. About 50 days later, tadpoles started to metamorphose. Fully metamorphosed froglets with completely reabsorbed tails were anaesthetized in 2 mg/L MS-222 solution and dissected or reared till the maturity (2–4 years) to be crossed. Their sex was determined through the morphology of gonads. The juveniles with malformed or insufficiently developed gonads were marked as “0” sex. All gonads were photographed.

2.3 Statistical Analyses

For the following analysis, we divided crosses into five groups that differed in mother/father genotype combinations according to mating pairs known from natural water frog populations: R-E (female × male; RR × RL), L-E (LL × RL, RL × RL), primary hybridization (LL × RR, LL × RR), homospecific parental crosses (RR × RR, LL × LL) and other crosses (RR × RL from L-E, RL × RR, RL from L-E × RL from R-E).

We analysed data in R 4.1.2 [22] using primarily Generalized Estimating Equations Models (GEEGLM) with a binomial distribution (logistic link) from the library “geepack” [23]. As a dependent variable, we used (i) presence/absence of egg fertilization, (ii) presence/absence of embryos survival till stage 25, (iii) presence/absence of tadpole survival till metamorphosis. As one cluster in the model, we defined one clutch of eggs from one crossing. For the analysis, we selected only combinations of males and females with more than six cross IDs. In order to test, which factor best explains the successful development rate of embryos, we used as possible explanatory variables: female genotype, male genotype, mitochondrial information of mother, compatibility of mitochondrial and nuclear information, population type of female, population type of male, to create set of models. We compared these models by calculation of quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion (QIC) for GEEGLM from the library “MuMIn” [24]. We performed the stepwise selection up to the third step, including also the interaction between tested variables. Models were compared based on QIC also to a null model.

We then used GEEGLMs and a set of explanatory variables useful to test particular hypotheses: (i) Are there differences in the proportion of fertilized eggs/embryos survival/tadpole survival among various types of crosses (L-E system, R-E system, primary hybridization, homospecific parental crosses)? (ii) Which gametotype (father’s/mother’s) influence the proportion of embryos survival among various type of crosses? (iii) Are there differences in embryonic survival among particular progeny in interaction with mitochondrial information? (iv) Are there differences in embryonic survival among individual mother × father combinations? (v) Are there differences in the proportion of embryo/tadpole survival between families fathered by RL males from L-E and R-E systems? In addition, we compared the fertility of females by the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a negative binomial distribution (logarithmic link) from library “lme4” [25]. We used the number of eggs of each female as a dependent variable, the female's genotype as an explanatory variable, and her population type and mitochondrial information as random terms. The significance of the model was tested by comparison to a null model. The plots were created using library “sciplot” [26].

2.4 Mitochondrial Sequencing

The type of mitochondrion may play a role in a frog sensitivity to oxygen deficiency and its survival [27, 28]. We, therefore, amplified and sequenced the mitochondrial ND2 gene following Plötner et al. [29]. PCR products were commercially Sanger-sequenced by SeqMe s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic). Sequence editing was performed and aligned in BioEdit v.7.0.9.0 (Bioedit Company, Raleigh, USA) [30], and variable sites in sequences were evaluated using Mega v 5.1. (Tempe, Arizona) [31].

2.5 Microsatellite Genotyping

Parentals were genotyped at ten microsatellite loci using two multiplex PCR sets. Multiplex 1: RlCA1b5 [32], Ga1a19 [33], Rrid013A [32, 34], Res14 [35]. Multiplex 2: Res22 [35], Rrid169A [36], Re1Caga10, Re2Caga3 and RlCA1b6 [33], Rrid082A [36]. PCR protocol was based on a study by Christiansen and Reyer [36]. Individual genotypes were based on species-specifity of amplified alleles described in Doležálková-Kaštánková et al. [16]. Fragment-length analyses were performed on the ABI 3730 Avant capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) with an internal size standard (GeneScan-500 LIZ, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); the alleles were scored with GeneMapper v. 3. 7 (Applied Biosystems, Zug, Switzerland).

To verify the preliminary phenotypic determination of the adult frogs, we run Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) via covariance matrix with data standardization in GenAlEx v. 6. 41 (Canberra, Australia) [37]. PCoA was performed on multi-allelic microsatellite profiles of adult frogs used as parents in crosses.

3. Results
3.1 Microsatellite Genotyping

Results of Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) on microsatellite data from 143 adult individuals supported morphological taxon identification (Supplementary Fig. 2) of 81 P. esculentus (12 females, 69 males), 52 P. ridibundus (42 females, ten males) and 10 P. lessonae (four females, six males).

3.2 Mitochondrial Variation

The cytoplasmatic background of the females was tested for the possible influence of the mito-nuclear compatibility on the type of produced gametes. Analysis of mitochondrial variation based on 55 ND2 sequences (partial length 669 bp) detected 86 variable sites (Supplementary Table 4) corresponding to three species-specific mtDNA profiles when compared with the NCBI BLAST results (GenBank numbers: MN864876, MN808439, AM749716); P. ridibundus mtDNA was found in 15 RR females; P. lessonae mtDNA contained 24 RR females, 10 RL females and four LL females; P. kurtmuelleri (KK) mtDNA was found in two RR females (Supplementary Table 3).

3.3 Levels of Parental Fertility

To begin with, we studied differences among hybrid male gonads in terms of functional development and the ability to reproduce. Pelophylax esculentus males differed in testis size and shape (Supplementary Fig. 3), with the right testis usually being smaller. Moreover, we observed atypical morphological structures with evidence of segmentation (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Experimental crosses between RR, RL and LL males and females resulted in 211 families (Supplementary Fig. 1), with 2939 juveniles undergoing metamorphosis (Supplementary Tables 5,6). The fertilization success (FS) in RR × RL (R-E) backcrosses ranged from 39.6% to 100%. The only case of 100% FS was observed in a cross 20-GH fathered by an R-E hybrid male 12-2016 AD5. Generally, higher values of FS were recorded in homospecific parental crosses RR × RR (65.1–99.9%) and RR × LL crosses (87.4–100%), indicating a better fertilization ability in recombined sexual sperms. On the other hand, one of the lowest values of FS (2.9 and 4.7%) was observed in the eggs of two P. lessonae females and hybrid males from the L-E system (crosses 14-BC and 23-BC). The same hybrid male (15SK2WF3M) had low FS (4.1%) in combination with another P. ridibundus female (cross 9-BC), suggesting a low quality of sperm. Detailed information about FS is given in Supplementary Table 5, Fig. 2a.

Fig. 2.

Proportion of (a) unfertilized eggs, (b) undeveloped embryos, (c) undeveloped tadpoles, (d) overall survival in relation to progeny genotype at different population systems (mean ± SE). Detailed informations (n, clusters, df, χ2, p-value, QICΔnull.m, W) are described in the main text, section 3.5.

Female fecundity based on the quality and quantity of ovulating eggs was higher in RR females in comparison with RL and LL females (df = 57, χ2 = 12.62, p = 0.002, QICΔnull.m = –8.60). The biggest egg clutch (4328 eggs) was found in P. ridibundus female (16CZ2WF2F), finally crossed with seven hybrid males and FS ranging from 50.2 to 86.1% (Supplementary Table 5).

3.4 Mortality of the Progeny

For further analysis, we used families with fertile females (FS was higher than 5% and EM was lower than 90%). Within 192 families (Supplementary Table 5), there were 43028 fertilized eggs and 15417 embryos reaching stage 25, and 2939 tadpoles completing metamorphosis (Supplementary Table 6). Although most eggs cleaved, many zygotes did not get beyond the blastula stage.

R-E crosses: The number of RR × RL embryos decreased from 24708 to 5068 by stage25 during their development. The EM ranged between 4.5–100%, with an average of 79.5% (see Fig. 2, Supplementary Tables 5,6). The progeny fathered by 19 R-E males (Albrechtičky, Košatka) had an EM of 100% (24 families). In four R-E males (13cz3wf35m, 16cz4wf1m, 12-2016 AD1, 19cz1wf6m), we did not observe any developing fertilized eggs even in combinations with fertile females, implying that they were sterile. The average TM was 66.7% in total, with 1690 metamorphosed froglets (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 6). The maximum TM of 100 % was observed in 18 families fathered by 14 R-E males (Košatka, Lébus, Karsibor). A comparison of EM and TM in these families detected a higher average EM (79.5%) than average TM (66.7%). Detailed information is given in Supplementary Table 5, Supplementary Fig. 4 and Fig. 2.

L-E crosses: Embryonic survival rates differed significantly in families with P. esculentus backcrossed to P. lessonae. Lower EM (35.4%) was observed in progeny mothered by hybrid females than in progeny fathered by hybrid males (EM 79.2%), see Supplementary Table 6, while tadpole mortality was similar (75.5/79.7%). Hybrid x hybrid crosses (resulting in RR progeny) showed extreme mortality rates (EM 99.1%, TM 100%), see Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 4.

Homospecific parental crosses and primary hybridizations: In parental combinations (RR × RR, LL × LL), the average EM was much smaller (36.9%) than in hybrid backcrosses (RR × RL, RL × RR) (58.0%), resulting in RR progeny. The survival rate in F1 hybrid embryos (RR × LL) was higher in families mothered by P. ridibundus (low EM 15.6%) than in reciprocal families mothered by P. lessonae (high EM 63.8%), see Supplementary Table 5. A high EM (78.4%) was detected in hybrid × hybrid crosses that resulted in RL progeny (up to 100% EM in the family 11-HI). Eight families (two RR × RR, three RR × RL and three RL × RL) exhibited 100% TM. The EM and TM in 11 homospecific RR × RR crosses showed a higher average TM (93.6%) than average EM (35.2%), Fig. 2.

3.5 Rate of Mortality between Population Types

There were significant differences among types of crosses (Fig. 2) in proportion of fertilized eggs (n = 48402, clusters = 166, df = 3, χ2 = 590, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –1120), developed embryos (n = 37416, clusters = 166, df = 3, χ2 = 117, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –4009), developed tadpoles (n = 7111, clusters = 112, df = 3, χ2 = 124, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –267) and in consequence in overall survival (n = 41736, clusters = 144, df = 3, χ2 = 215, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –356).

Proportion of fertilized eggs differed among types of crosses significantly (n = 48402, clusters = 166, df = 3, χ2 = 590, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –1120), with RR (W = 1.27, p < 0.001), LE system (W = 21.70, p < 0.001), and RE system (W = 36.00, p < 0.001) having higher mortality than LL. Proportion of developed embryos differed among types of crosses significantly (n = 37416, clusters = 166, df = 3, χ2 = 117, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –4009), with RR not differing (W = 0.32, p = 0.570), but with LE system (W = 1.96, p < 0.001) and RE system (W = 9.74, p < 0.001) having higher mortality than LL. Proportion of developed tadpoles differed among types of crosses significantly (n = 7111, clusters = 112, df = 3, χ2 = 124, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –267), with RR (W = 60.10, p < 0.001), LE system (W = 29.60, p < 0.001), and RE system (W = 34.50, p < 0.001) having higher mortality than LL. Overall survival differed among types of crosses significantly (n = 41736, clusters = 144, df = 3, χ2 = 215, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –356), with RR (W = 4.92, p < 0.001), LE system (W = 7.35, p < 0.001), and RE system (W = 9.24, p < 0.001) having higher mortality/lower survival than LL.

Proportion of developed embryos (Fig. 3) depends primarily on male gametotype (n = 41763, clusters = 188, df = 2, χ2 = 77.10, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –8447), and female genotype (n = 41763, clusters = 188, df = 2, χ2 = 8.90, p = 0.012, QICΔnull.m = –258), and on their interaction (n = 41763, clusters = 188, df = 6, χ2 = 94.70, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –8963).

Fig. 3.

Proportion of undeveloped embryos (EM) in relation to father genotypes (mean ± SE). Detailed information (n, clusters, df, χ2, p-value, QICΔnull.m) are described in the main text, section 3.5.

Proportion of developed embryos (Fig. 4) differed among expected progeny types (n = 37644, clusters = 167, df = 3, χ2 = 102.20, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –6787), and among mitochondrial types (n = 37644, clusters = 167, df = 2, χ2 = 33.70, p <0.001, QICΔnull.m = –2950). RL progeny (W = 0.62, p = 0.430) and RR progeny (W = 0.11, p = 0.740) had similar mortality of embryos as LL progeny, while RR/RL progeny had much higher mortality (W = 65.26, p < 0.001). Progeny with mitochondria from Central Europe, LL-like mtDNA (W = 31.57, p < 0.001) and RR-like mtDNA (W = 27.12, p < 0.001) had lower mortality than progeny bearing the South-European KK-like mtDNA.

Fig. 4.

Proportion of undeveloped embryos concerning their genotype and type of inherited mitochondrion (mean ± SE). Detailed information (n, clusters, df, χ2, p-value, QICΔnull.m, W) are described in the main text, section 3.5.

Proportion of developed embryos (Fig. 5) differed among mother × father combinations (n = 37976, clusters = 161, df = 7, χ2 = 408.00, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –9029). Homospecific crosses RR × RR had similar mortality as LL × LL crosses (W = 0.32, p = 0.571), from primary hybridizations, LL × RR had similar mortality (W = 2.39, p = 0.122) and RR × LL had lower mortality (W = 4.21, p = 0.040), from LE system RL × LL had similar mortality (W < 0.01, p = 0.981) but RL × RL had higher mortality (W = 177.20, p < 0.001) as well as LL × RL combination (W = 4.68, p = 0.030), and RE system represented by RR × RL combination had the higher mortality (W = 39.47, p < 0.001). Thus, the model can be simplified on four groups: homospecific parental crosses, primary hybridization, LE system and RE system. There were significant differences among these groups (n = 37976, clusters = 161, df = 3, χ2 = 62.10, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –7721), however this simplification leaded to worse QIC (QICΔ among models = +1308). In comparison to homospecific parental crosses, primary hybridizations had similar mortality (W = 1.70, p = 0.193), but LE system tendet to have higher mortality (W = 3.10, p = 0.078) and RE system had much higher mortality (W = 41.89, p < 0.001).

Fig. 5.

Proportion of undeveloped embryos in relation to mother x father combinations (mean ± SE). Detailed information (n, clusters, df, χ2, p-value, QICΔnull.m, W) are described in the main text, section 3.5.

Proportion of developed embryos (Supplementary Fig. 4) did not differ between RL males from LE and RE systems significantly (n = 28836, clusters = 135, df = 1, χ2 = 1.84, p = 0.175, QICΔnull.m = +42.95), and did not differ among females (n = 28836, clusters = 135, df = 2, χ2 = 1.52, p = 0.468, QICΔnull.m = +162.60), but there was strong interaction (n = 28836, clusters = 135, df = 4, χ2 = 107.00, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –385) with LE males crossing with LL females significantly being the group with highest mortality (W = 13.27, p < 0.001). Proportion of developed tadpoles differed between RL males from LE and RE systems significantly (n = 6248, clusters = 92, df = 1, χ2 = 4.17, p = 0.041, QICΔnull.m = –33.70), with males from LE system with higher mortality, did not differ among females (n = 6248, clusters = 92, df = 2, χ2 = 1.83, p = 0.400, QICΔnull.m = +4.62), and there was strong interaction (n = 6248, clusters = 92, df = 4, χ2 = 2046.00, p < 0.001, QICΔnull.m = –268) with RE males crossing with RL females significantly being the group with lowest mortality (W = 1.74, p = 0.187).

3.6 Morphological Abnormalities in Early Development

During the initial stages of embryogenesis, we captured phases of blastula cell divisions, gastrulation and neurulation. We sorted them sequentially (Fig. 1D). In some cases (especially RR × RL crosses), we registered atypical morphology as malformations or heterogeneous cell divisions (Fig. 1E) that led to embryo death (apoptosis). In later phases (after neurulation), larval malformations occurred not only in RR × RL crosses but also in other RR × RR or RL × RL crosses.

4. Discussion

Our results of 211 laboratory crossbred families showed that the development of Pelophylax tadpoles varies in survival rate and morphological malformations. This post-zygotic reproductive dynamics in mixed populations is significantly driven by parental combinations of species pairs. Moreover, the father's genetic input, in particular, had a significant effect on survival rates in progeny (Figs. 3,5). Setting aside the apparent influence that the condition of the sperm has, we discuss the role of compatibility between parental haploid genomes in the survival rate of early tadpole development.

4.1 Survival Rate of Progeny Is Defined by the Parental Taxa Combination

Survival rates in pure parental species pairs. Overall, the best values in the proportion of developing eggs, embryos, tadpoles and overall survival showed the progeny of homospecific LL × LL crosses (Fig. 2). This species, P. lessonae, typically occurs in low numbers within commonplace mixed populations with P. esculentus [15]. Better performance in early developmental stages may give P. lessonae a competing advantage in survival rates against the reproductive dominance of parasitizing P. esculentus that is not only higher than P. lessonae in numbers but also in clutch sizes (Supplementary Table 5). Still, a relatively high proportion of fertilized eggs and developed embryos were observed in RRxRR crosses. However, the proportion of undeveloped tadpoles was even higher than the values counted for L-E and R-E systems with included hybrids (Fig. 2).

We assume that later when the embryo finishes neurulation, and the arising tadpole reaches stage 25, ecological factors may impact TM more than genetic ones. Omitting the biotic factors like infections observed in some semi-natural experiments [38, 39, 40], factors such as competition or density of tadpoles may influence the amount of successfully metamorphosed juveniles of amphibian taxa. Reading and Clarke [41] found positively correlated evidence of proportionally higher tadpole mortality in higher tadpole densities. The negative effect of density in other amphibians delayed tadpole growth due to the excretion of specific substances by tadpoles [42] and resulted in smaller sizes at the metamorphosis stage [43]. Toxic defences were observed in Bufo toads [44], Litoria [45] and other Rana tadpoles [46]. Laboratory-raised tadpoles of P. shqipericus showed high sensitivity to a temperature that strongly affected developmental and survival rates [47]. We do not know the exact causation for the low P. ridibundus tadpole performance constantly observed in our study. If environmental factors are functional players in tadpole performance, the ecological disadvantage of this species will provide positive prospects from a conservation perspective. Pelophylax ridibundus has recently been expanding and invading many areas throughout Europe [48, 49, 50, 51]. Any ecological handicap in relation to P. esculentus or P. lessonae may prevent unwanted population replacements of L-E systems by pure P. ridibundus.

4.2 Survival Rates in L-E and R-E Systems and the Role of Sexes

Total proportions of fertilised eggs and developed embryos were relatively similar between L-E and R-E systems but much lower than homospecific crosses in parental taxa. However, once the early stages passed this period, tadpoles mostly of hybrid hemiclonal origin performed even better than pure P. ridibundus progeny. Survival rates were not affected by the hybrid genotype as such but were defined by the parent’s gender. Greater fertility and a relatively high proportion of developed embryos, in values comparative to LL and RR females from homospecific crosses, were shown by hybrid females backcrossed to P. lessonae males. Their average EM of 35% significantly differed from reciprocal crosses between hybrid males and P. lessonae females, with an EM of almost 80% (Fig. 5). Even higher EM (99.5%) was recorded in progeny fathered by a hybrid male from Poland [52]. Combining two parental hybrids provided the highest EM over mother x father pairs (Fig. 5). The low performance of embryos in hybrid x hybrid crosses have also been previously observed [53, 54, 55]. However, comparing mother × father and father × mother mate pairs (Figs. 3,5), we found that a low proportion of developing embryos results from the hybrid male sex.

Low EM was not only a feature of hybrid males from L-E populations but also of conspecific males from R-E populations. The mortality of progeny fathered by such P. esculentus males was significantly higher in the initial phases of embryogenesis (EM) than during the later phases of tadpole development (TM, Supplementary Fig. 4). Our results correspond with the research of Kawamura and Nishioka [56], who presented mortality rates close to our results in two B1 families of amphispermic hybrid males from Western Germany. Some authors observed the opposite pattern i.e., a lower EM but higher TM [15, 52]. Variation in survival rates in progeny fathered by males from the R-E system may have been caused by variations in sperm production. The occurrence of different germ cells in the testes may lead to the formation of only R sperm, only L sperm, or both sperm types at once, resulting in variable progeny [16, 17, 52, 57].

One theory predicts that high embryonic mortality might be caused by the accumulation of deleterious mutations in clonally transmitted genomes [55]. A study of all-hybrid P. esculentus populations revealed post-zygotic selection against parental genotypes, P. lessonae and P. esculentus, explained by a role of low genetic diversity in clonal gametes and fixation of deleterious mutations [10]. However, this phenomenon alone cannot explain contrasting values of survival rates in early progeny between P. esculentus fathers (low values) and P. esculentus mothers (high values). We assume two alternative phenomena might have played a key role in the early development of hybridogenetic water frogs. Only maternal genes (mRNAs and ribosomes) are expressed during the initial stages of early embryonic development, whereas the expression of paternal genes starts in the late blastula [58]. The subsequent incompatibility between L and R genomes in the blastula stage may result in the interrupted or malformed development of cleaved embryos and high EM. Indeed, we detected various morphological abnormalities in hybrid offsprings such as deformed eggs, unhatched embryos, and tadpoles with irregular body shapes (Fig. 1E), correlating with earlier research [55, 59]. We, therefore, conclude that the high embryonic mortality in the hybrid offspring might have been influenced by the genomic incompatibility between the clonal genome from a father and the sexual genome from a mother. Additionally, previous authors have noted that disturbances and irregularities during hybrid spermatogenesis have led to lower fertility [15, 60]. We have no direct data on male spermatogenesis, but our observations of the resulting reproduction patterns suggest either a quality difference among the sperm produced or a generally low-fertile sperm produced by hybrid P. esculentus.

4.3 Associated Observed Phenomena in Early Developmental Studies of Water Frogs

As well as laboratory-produced mate pairs typical for natural populations within L-E and R-E systems, we crossed P. ridibundus and P. lessonae to form new P. esculentus F1s. The successful development of newly born F1 was also reported by Berger and Günther [52] and Hotz et al. [61]. Here we analyzed reciprocal crosses and found significantly unequal survival rates in progeny in which crosses of RR mothers × LL fathers had EM of only 15.6%. In contrast, crosses of LL mothers × RR fathers had EM reaching 63.8% (Fig. 5). The natural origin of F1 hybrid progenies has been assigned to primary hybridizations between bigger-sized P. ridibundus females and smaller-sized P. lessonae males [18, 62, 63] due to assumed behavioural constraints in reciprocal amplexus between the large P. ridibundus male and smaller P. lessonae female [61]. Our study shows that in addition to preferential matings due to behaviour constraints, it is also important which parental species is genetically the father and the mother. Behavioural and genome compatibilities between parental taxa favour primary unidirectional hybridizations between P. ridibundus females and P. lessonae males. Both phenomena might have affected the historical origin of P. esculentus. Still, Pelophylax water frogs are one of few known cases because the successful primary crosses between sexual taxa in other animal systems were in most cases apparently unidirectional with respect to sex rather than reciprocal [64]. Possible mechanisms of significant differences in offspring survival in reciprocal crosses remain unclear to us. We may only hypothesize that P. esculentus F1s with P. lessonae mtDNA may have lower mito-nuclear compatibility and performance in survival rates than F1s with P. ridibundus mtDNA. Wild-caught P. esculentus and even P. ridibundus bearing P. lessonae mtDNA are, however, common in nature [29, 65].

Finally, we observed a significant difference in embryonic survival rates depending on the type of inherited mtDNA in progeny. Due to the matrilinear heredity, assumed preferential primary hybridizations between P. ridibundus females and P. lessonae males in nature formed P. esculentus F1s with a P. ridibundus mtDNA type. However, hybrid males producing R gametes and mating with P. lessonae females may have also resulted in the transfer of P. lessonae cytoplasm to hybrid cells [66]. Indeed, not only P. esculentus but also many P. ridibundus bear P. lessonae type mtDNA. The greater effectiveness of the enzymes encoded by P. lessonae mtDNA may give some advantage to P. ridibundus and probably P. esculentus in the northern parts of their ranges [29]. Pelophylax lessonae is known for better cold tolerance reaching higher latitudes and longitudes, while P. ridibundus is a cold-sensitive species from lowlands that recolonized the deglaciated northern parts of Europe later than P. lessonae [29]. The laboratory progeny of P. ridibundus and P. esculentus showed very similar embryonic survival rates in having P. ridibundus or P. lessonae mtDNA (Fig. 4), supporting the compatibility of P. lessonae cytoplasm with the nuclear DNA background of P. ridibundus genomes collected in Central Europe. A striking contrast can be seen however, in the significantly higher numbers of undeveloped embryos in P. ridibundus and P. esculentus progeny when mtDNA were of the P. kurtmuelleri type (Fig. 4). Although Pelophylax kurtmuelleri mtDNA occurs at low levels in Central European water frogs, it may represent an opposite case to P. lessonae mtDNA, as P. kurtmuelleri is endemic to the warmer Balkans in Southern Europe. Its mtDNA may not be fully compatible with Central European, more cold-adapted, Pelophylax genomes.

5. Conclusions

Our study of early development combining taxa and sexes of three Central European water frog taxa provided some patterns on survival rates of particular progeny genotypes. The results further showed great survival rates (even compared to homospecific parental crosses) of P. esculentus F1s created de novo from parental species despite significant divergence between the nuclear and mitochondrial DNA of P. ridibundus and P. lessonae. Moreover, data indicates not only a potential variance in progeny within R-E systems due to the likely occurrence of more types of gametes produced by hybrid males but also revealed reproductive dynamics in L-E systems. Here, P. esculentus females produce highly vital progeny with P. lessonae males (with relatively unlimited sperm availability during a breeding season) and well-maintained P. esculentus in taxonomically mixed populations. In contrast, P. esculentus males seem to have only poor reproductive potential, wasting P. esculentus and P. lessonae eggs, available in limited numbers during the reproductive season in temperate Europe. Recent studies have provided alarming evidence of P. lessonae, and mixed L-E population declines over large areas in Europe [50, 51, 67]. Future research may consider some conservation measures for P. esculentus males from L-E systems, like their removal from populations threatened by declines to reduce competitive spawnings. Such actions would support mating between females of P. esculentus and P. lessonae with P. lessonae males, making natural populations stronger through the vital growth of P. esculentus and P. lessonae progeny.

Author Contributions

MDK participated in the design of the study, collected samples, performed crossing experiments, counted eggs/embryos at different developmental phases, made photos of malformed embryos, analyzed microsatellite and mitochondrial data, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. PP ran the statistical analyses of the data, helped with the data interpretation and participated in draft editing. LC conceived of the study and participated in sampling, crossing experiments and manuscript writing. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All experimental protocols were approved by the Federal Commission for Animal Experiments (FCAE) and by the Standing committee on animal health under the Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office FSVO, Switzerland, under permit nos 119/2013: TV 5113 and TH 103. We declare that all other manipulations with animals were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations (CZ02361).

Acknowledgment

We thank Jörg Plötner, Gaston-Denis Guex for technical support and help during crossing experiments. Many thanks to Mgr. Veronika Labajová, who participated in sampling and crossing procedures, and Matěj Kaštánek, who helped with eggs/tadpoles countings. We thank Christopher Murray Johnson, who proofread the manuscript, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Funding

This research was funded by the Czech Science Foundation (grant number GA 19-24559S to M.D-K. and L.C.), and by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (grant number RVO 67985904 to M.D-K. and L.C.).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References
[1]
Mallet J. Hybrid speciation. Nature. 2007; 446: 279–283.
[2]
Lamatsch DK, Stöck M. Sperm-Dependent Parthenogenesis and Hybridogenesis in Teleost Fishes. Lost Sex (pp. 399–432). Springer: Dordrecht. 2009.
[3]
Coyne JA, Orr HA. Speciation. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA. 2004.
[4]
Wakchaure R, Ganguly S, Praveen PK, Sharma S, Kumar A, Mahajan T, et al. Importance of heterosis in animals: a review. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Innovative Science. 2015; 1: 1–5.
[5]
Vorburger C. Heterozygous fitness effects of clonally transmitted genomes in waterfrogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2001; 14: 602–610.
[6]
Lavanchy G, Schwander T. Hybridogenesis. Current Biology. 2019; 29: R9–R11.
[7]
Gomez‐Mestre I, Saccoccio VL, Iijima T, Collins EM, Rosenthal GG, Warkentin KM. The shape of things to come: linking developmental plasticity to post‐metamorphic morphology in anurans. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2010; 23: 1364–1373.
[8]
Sultan SE. Developmental plasticity: re-conceiving the genotype. Interface Focus. 2017; 7: 20170009.
[9]
Beldade P, Mateus ARA, Keller RA. Evolution and molecular mechanisms of adaptive developmental plasticity. Molecular Ecology. 2011; 20: 1347–1363.
[10]
Reyer H, Arioli-Jakob C, Arioli M. Post-zygotic selection against parental genotypes during larval development maintains all-hybrid populations of the frog Pelophylax esculentus. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2015; 15: 131.
[11]
Graf JD, Polls Pelaz M. Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. In Dawley RM, Bogart JP (eds.) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates (pp. 289–302). New York State Museum: Albany. 1989.
[12]
Alves MJ, Coelho MM, Collares-Pereira MJ. Evolution in action through hybridisation and polyploidy in an Iberian freshwater fish: a genetic review. Genetica. 2001; 111: 375–385.
[13]
Zaleśna A, Choleva L, Ogielska M, Rábová M, Marec F, Ráb P. Evidence for integrity of parental genomes in the diploid hybridogenetic water frog Pelophylax esculentus by genomic in situ hybridization. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2011; 134: 206–212.
[14]
Uzzell T, Berger L. Electrophoretic phenotypes of Rana ridibunda, Rana lessonae, and their hybridogenetic associate, Rana esculenta. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1975; 13–24.
[15]
Uzzell T, Günther R, Berger L. Rana ridibunda and Rana esculenta: a leaky hybridogenetic system (Amphibia Salientia). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1977; 128: 147–171.
[16]
Doležálková-Kaštánková M, Mazepa G, Jeffries DL, Perrin N, Plötner M, Plötner J, et al. Capture and return of sexual genomes by hybridogenetic frogs provides clonal genome enrichment in a sexual species. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 1633.
[17]
Vinogradov AE, Borkin LJ, Günther R, Rosanov JM. Two germ cell lineages with genomes of different species in one and the same animal. Hereditas. 1991; 114: 245–251.
[18]
Berger L, Uzzell T, Hotz H. Sex determination and sex ratios in western Palearctic water frogs: XX and XY female hybrids in the Pannonian Basin? Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1988; 220–239.
[19]
Plötner J. Die westpaläarktischen Wasserfrösche: von Märtyrern der Wissenschaft zur biologischen Sensation. Laurenti Verlag: Bielefeld. 2005.
[20]
Berger L, Rybacki M. Sperm competition between two species of European water frogs [Rana ridibunda and Rana lessonae]. Zoologica Poloniae. 1994; 39: 281–291.
[21]
Gosner KL. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica. 1960; 16: 183–190.
[22]
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R version 3.0.2. Vienna, Austria. 2021. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/ (Accessed: 13 March 2022).
[23]
Hojsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations. Journal of Statistical Software. 2006; 15: 1–11.
[24]
Bartoń K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17. 2020. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (Accessed: 13 March 2022).
[25]
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015; 67: 1–48.
[26]
Morales M. Sciplot: Scientific Graphing Functions for Factorial Designs. R package version 1.2-0. 2020. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sciplot (Accessed: 13 March 2022).
[27]
Pagano A, Joly P, Hotz H. Taxon composition and genetic variation of water frogs in the Mid-Rhone floodplain. Life Sciences. 1997; 320: 759–766.
[28]
Plenet S, Hervant F, Joly P. Ecology of the Hybridogenetic Rana esculenta Complex: Differential Oxygen Requirements of Tadpoles. Evolutionary Ecology. 2000; 14: 13–23.
[29]
Plötner J, Uzzell T, Beerli P, Spolsky C, Ohst T, Litvinchuk SN, et al. Widespread unidirectional transfer of mitochondrial DNA: a case in western Palaearctic water frogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2008; 21: 668–681.
[30]
Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999; 41: 95–98.
[31]
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2011; 28: 2731–2739.
[32]
Garner TWJ, Gautschi B, ROthlisberger S, Reyer HU. A set of CA repeat microsatellite markers derived from the pool frog, Rana lessonae. Molecular Ecology. 2000; 9: 2173–2175.
[33]
Arioli M, Jakob C, Reyer HU. Genetic diversity in water frog hybrids (Pelophylax esculentus) varies with population structure and geographic location. Molecular Ecology. 2010; 19: 1814–1828.
[34]
Hotz H, Uzzell T, Guex G, Alpers D, Semlitsch RD, Beerli P. Microsatellites: a tool for evolutionary genetic studies of western Palearctic water frogs. Zoosystematics and Evolution. 2001; 77: 43–50.
[35]
Zeisset I, Rowe G. Beebee TJC. Polymerase chain reaction primers for microsatellite loci in the north European water frogs Rana ridibunda and R. lessonae. Molecular Ecology. 2000; 9: 1173–1174.
[36]
Christiansen DG, Reyer H. From clonal to sexual hybrids: genetic recombination via triploids in all-hybrid populations of water frogs. Evolution. 2009; 63: 1754–1768.
[37]
Peakall R, Smouse PE. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2006; 6: 288–295.
[38]
Pruvost NBM, Hoffmann A, Reyer HU. Gamete production patterns, ploidy, and population genetics reveal evolutionary significant units in hybrid water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus). Ecology and Evolution. 2013; 3: 2933–2946.
[39]
Semlitsch RD, Reyer HU. Performance of tadpoles from the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta complex: interactions with pond drying and interspecific competition. Evolution. 1992; 46: 665–676.
[40]
Abt Tietje G, Reyer H. Larval Development and Recruitment of Juveniles in a Natural Population of Rana lessonae and Rana esculenta. Copeia. 2004; 2004: 638–646.
[41]
Reading CJ, Clarke RT. Impacts of climate and density on the duration of the tadpole stage of the common toad Bufo bufo. Oecologia. 1999; 121: 310–315.
[42]
Browne RK, Pomering M, Hamer AJ. High density effects on the growth, development and survival of Litoria aurea tadpoles. Aquaculture. 2003; 215: 109–121.
[43]
Brady LD, Griffiths RA. Developmental responses to pond desiccation in tadpoles of the British anuran amphibians (Bufo bufo, B. calamita and Rana temporaria). Journal of Zoology. 2000; 252: 61–69.
[44]
Bókony V, Móricz ÁM, Tóth Z, Gál Z, Kurali A, Mikó Z, et al. Variation in Chemical Defense among Natural Populations of Common Toad, Bufo bufo, Tadpoles: the Role of Environmental Factors. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2016; 42: 329–338.
[45]
Plenderleith TL, Johnstone CD, Reina RD, Chapple DG. Density is more important than predation risk for predicting growth and developmental outcomes in tadpoles of spotted tree frog, Litoria spenceri (Dubois 1984). Austral Ecology. 2019; 44: 1285–1297.
[46]
Loman J. Cohort patterns in Rana tadpole metamorphosis. Journal of Zoology. 2016; 300: 314–323.
[47]
Turani B, Aliko V. Effects of temperature on in-vitro produced embryos and larval development of Albanian water frog, Pelophylax shqipericus, Second International Conference “Biotechnology in Agriculture”. Agricultural University of Tirana, Albania. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2017.
[48]
Dufresnes C, Leuenberger J, Amrhein V, Bühler C, Thiébaud J, Bohnenstengel T, et al. Invasion genetics of marsh frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus sensu lato) in Switzerland. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2018; 123: 402–410.
[49]
Holsbeek G, Jooris R. Potential impact of genome exclusion by alien species in the hybridogenetic water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex). Biological Invasions. 2010; 12: 1–13.
[50]
Jośko P, Pabijan M. Recent shifts in taxonomic compositions of water frog populations (Anura: Pelophylax) inhabiting fish ponds in southern Poland. Amphibia-Reptilia. 2020; 42: 59–72.
[51]
Mayer M, Hawlitschek O, Zahn A, Glaw F. Composition of twenty green frog populations (Pelophylax) across Bavaria, Germany. Salamandra. 2013; 49: 31–44.
[52]
Berger L, Günther R. Inheritance patterns of water frog males from the environments of nature reserve Steckby, Germany. Zoologica Poloniae. 1991; 37: 87–100.
[53]
Guex G, Hotz H, Semlitsch RD. Deleterious alleles and differential viability in progeny of natural hemiclonal frogs. Evolution. 2002; 56: 1036–1044.
[54]
Pruvost NB, Hollinger D, Reyer HU. Genotype‐temperature interactions on larval performance shape population structure in hybridogenetic water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex). Functional Ecology. 2013; 27: 459–471.
[55]
Vorburger C. Fixation of deleterious mutations in clonal lineages: evidence from hybridogenetic frogs. Evolution. 2001; 55: 2319–2332.
[56]
Kawamura T, Nishioka M. Hybridization Experiments among Rana lessonae, Rana ridibunda and Rana esculenta, with Special Reference to Hybridogenesis. Scientific Report of the Laboratory for Amphibian Biology. 1986; 8: 117–271.
[57]
Polls-Pelaz M. Modes of gametogenesis among kleptons of the hybridogenetic water frog complex: an evolutionary synthesis. Zoologica Poloniae. 1994; 39: 123–138.
[58]
Stick R, Dreyer C. Developmental Control of Nuclear Proteins in Amphibia. The Molecular Biology of Fertilization (pp. 153–188). Academic Press: Orlando, Florida. 1989.
[59]
Christiansen DG, Fog K, Pedersen BV, Boomsma JJ. Reproduction and hybrid load in all‐hybrid populations of Rana esculenta water frogs in Denmark. Evolution. 2005; 59: 1348–1361.
[60]
Günther R. Studies of meiosis in males of Rana ridibunda PALL, Rana lessonae CAM, and their hybrid Rana esculenta-L (Anura). Biologisches Zentralblatt. 1975; 94: 277–294.
[61]
Hotz H, Semlitsch RD, Gutmann E, Guex G, Beerli P. Spontaneous heterosis in larval life-history traits of hemiclonal frog hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999; 96: 2171–2176.
[62]
Blankenhorn HJ. Reproduction and Mating Behavior in Rana Lessonae-Rana Esculenta Mixed Populations. The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians (pp. 389–410). Springer: Boston, MA. 1977.
[63]
Hermaniuk A, Czajkowska M, Borkowska A, Taylor JRE. Body size variation in hybrids among populations of European water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex) with different breeding systems. Amphibia-Reptilia. 2020; 41: 361–371.
[64]
Avise JC. Clonality: The Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution of Sexual Abstinence in Vertebrate Animals. Oxford University Press: USA. 2008.
[65]
Spolsky C, Uzzell T. Natural interspecies transfer of mitochondrial DNA in amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1984; 81: 5802–5805.
[66]
Spolsky C, Uzzell T. Evolutionary history of the hybridogenetic hybrid frog Rana esculenta as deduced from mtDNA analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1986; 3: 44–56.
[67]
Dufresnes C, Golay J, Schuerch J, Dejean T, Dubey S. Monitoring of the last stronghold of native pool frogs (Pelophylax lessonae) in Western Europe, with implications for their conservation. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2020; 66: 1–10.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Share
Back to top