1. Introduction
Loss- or gain-of function mutations in SCN5A, the gene encoding the
Na1.5 -subunit of the cardiac sodium channel, have been involved
in several inherited cardiac arrhythmias including Brugada syndrome (BrS),
cardiac conduction defect, type-3 long QT syndrome, and sick sinus syndrome [1].
The hundreds of mutations identified in SCN5A highlight the crucial role
of Na1.5 in cardiac conduction and rhythm. Unlike potassium channel genes,
which encode one fourth of tetramers constituting functional channels,
Na1.5 channels were thought to be structured as monomers, since the gene
encodes the entire 4-domain channel -subunit. It was thus unexpected to
report Na1.5 mutants with a dominant-negative effect on wild-type (WT)
channels, i.e., a decrease of I exceeding the 50% of current density
expected in case of haploinsufficiency observed when coexpressing some mutants
with WT channels in a 1:1 ratio to mimic patient heterozygosity, as we and others
did [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Na1.5 -subunits
could interact with each other and that a trafficking-efficient mutant channel
was able to drive a trafficking-deficient one to the surface membrane [3]. This
transcomplementation mechanism, i.e., the functional cooperation of two different
entities through their physical interaction, led to a small rescue of inward
Na current (I). We have also evidenced that Na1.5
-subunits form dimers through an interaction site located in the domain
I-II linker, and that Na1.5 channels not only interact but also gate as
dimers [10]. More recently, we and others reported that dominant negative
suppression exerted by Na1.5 mutants could also be caused by impairing the
WT gating probability, a mechanism resulting from the coupled gating of Na
channel -subunits [6, 8, 11]. Altogether, these observations led us to
examine the capacity of Na channels to transcomplement trafficking or
gating-deficient mutant channels to rescue I.
To assess this question, we studied three Na1.5 mutations: R878C and
G1743R, which abolished I by two distinct mechanisms, i.e., gating
deficiency [12, 13] and trafficking deficiency [14] respectively, and the
C-terminal truncated mutant R1860X (Cter), which displayed slow
inactivation kinetics and a drastic leftward shift of the steady-state
inactivation. Heterologous expression of mutant and WT channels in a 1:1 ratio
led to a reduction in I density of 80% for the G1743R
trafficking-deficient channels and 50% for the R878C trafficking-efficient
channels [3]. Interestingly, because of the trafficking capability of R878C and
the gating capacity of G1743R, coexpression of both mutant channels led to a
small I by a mechanism of transcomplementation. Importantly, we also
observed a cooperation of Na1.5 mutant channels R878C and Cter at
the cell surface. Indeed, coexpression of the full-length but non-gating R878C
channel with the Cter channel rescued the inactivation kinetics of the
latter. This strongly suggests that the C-terminus of R878C contributes to
inactivate the truncated Cter channel, raising the possibility of a
cooperation between Na1.5-subunits C-termini, as a sort of domain swapping.
Once again, our results provide evidence that Na1.5 channels are able to
oligomerize, traffic and gate as multi-channel complexes. Importantly, we have
shown here that such a cooperation could lead to the restoration of a small
I, a mechanism that could contribute to explain the genotype-phenotype
discordance often observed between family members carrying Na-channel
pathogenic variants.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 SCN5A cDNA Cloning and Mutagenesis
The plasmid pcDNA3.1-GFP-hH1a (N-terminal GFP) was a gift from Dr. H. Abriel
(Bern, Switzerland). Na1.5 mutants R878C, G1743R and R1860X
(Cter) were prepared using the QuikChange II XL Site-Directed
Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and
verified by sequencing. The plasmid pcDNA3-CD4-KKXX and the anti-CD4-KKXX
antibody were gifts from Dr. J. Mérot (Nantes, France). This plasmid has been
designed to express CD4 carrying the KKXX motif of ER retention.
2.2 HEK293 Cell Culture and Transfection
HEK293 cells were transfected with jetPEI (Polyplus Transfection, NY, USA)
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For patch-clamp recordings, HEK293
cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-GFP-hH1a WT or mutants in 35-mm culture
dishes, with a total of 0.6 g of plasmid per 35 mm dish, to avoid
saturating currents. To mimic the heterozygous state of patients, cells were
co-transfected with 0.3 g of pcDNA3.1-hH1a (no tag) WT and 0.3
g of pcDNA3.1-GFP-hH1a-mutant, or 0.3 g of
pcDNA3.1-GFP-hH1a-mutant and 0.3 g of the second
pcDNA3.1-GFP-hH1a-mutant. For biochemical analysis, cells were plated in
25-cm flasks and transfected with 2 g of pcDNA3.1-GFP-hH1a WT
or mutant.
2.3 Electrophysiological Recordings
Patch-clamp recordings were carried out in the whole-cell configuration at room
temperature (22 °C) 36 h after transfection. Cells were bathed
in an extracellular Tyrode solution containing (in mM): 135 NaCl, 4 KCL, 2
MgCl, 2.5 CaCl, 1 NaHPO, 20 glucose, 10 HEPES, adjusted
to pH 7.4 with CsOH. Patch pipette medium was (in mM): 5 NaCl, 140 CsCl, 2
MgCl, 4 Mg-ATP, 5 EGTA, 10 HEPES, adjusted to pH 7.2 with CsOH. Some cells
transfected with the G1743R mutant were incubated for 24 h with 500 M
mexiletine to partially rescue the mutant-channel trafficking as in reference
[14].
Ionic currents were recorded with the amplifier Axopatch 200B (Axon Instruments,
CA, USA). Patch pipettes (Corning Kovar Sealing code 7052, WPI) had resistances
of 1.5–2.5 M, when filled with pipette medium. Currents were filtered
at 10 kHz (–3 dB, 8-pole low-pass Bessel filter) and digitized at 50 kHz (NI
PCI-6251, National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). Data were acquired and analyzed
with ELPHY2® software (G. Sadoc, CNRS, Gif/Yvette, France).
In order to measure peak I amplitude and determine current-voltage
relationships (I/V curves), currents were elicited from a holding potential of
–120 mV by 50-ms test potentials of 0.2 Hz frequency from –100 mV to 60 mV by
increments of 5 or 10 mV. For the activation-V protocol, currents were
elicited by 100-ms depolarizing pulses applied at 0.2 Hz from a holding potential
of –120 mV, in 5- or 10-mV increments between –100 and +60 mV. The steady-state
inactivation-V protocol was established from a holding potential of –120
mV and a 2-s conditioning prepulse was applied in 5- or 10-mV increments between
–140 and +30 mV, followed by a 50-ms test pulse to –20 mV at 0.2 Hz. Data for
the activation-V and steady-state inactivation-V relationships of
I were fitted to the Boltzmann equation as previously reported [3].
Inactivation-kinetics time constants ( and )
were measured by fitting with a double exponential function using Clampfit
(Molecular Devices, CA, USA).
2.4 Rat Neonatal Cardiomyocyte (RNC) Isolation and Transfection
Neonate 1-day-old rats were euthanized by decapitation. Their hearts were
dissected, digested with collagenase A (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) and
incubated in culture medium at 37 °C, 5% CO after 90 min
preplating on 60 mm plastic dishes to remove fibroblasts. Non-adherent cells were
plated at a density of 4 10 cells/well on 35 mm dishes
containing glass coverslips coated with 10 mg/mL laminin (Roche Diagnostics) in
culture medium DMEM (High Glucose/L-glutamine; Gibco ref 41965 039), supplemented
with 10% horse serum, 5% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, Cytosine -D
arabinofuranoside 25 mg/mL and incubated for 24 h (37 °C, 5% CO).
Cells were transfected in a 1%-CO incubator with 0.6 g of
N-terminal GFP fused constructs of WT or mutant Na1.5 using Lipofectamine
2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.5 Immunocytochemistry
Indirect immunofluorescence was performed on RNC primary culture fixed with
methanol for 10 min at –20 °C. Cells were then washed twice for 5 min
with Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), blocked in PBS-5% BSA for 30 min at room
temperature. Cells were incubated for one hour with primary antibodies: rabbit
anti-GFP (1:300, Torrey Pines Biolabs) to detect Na1.5-GFP and mouse
anti-CD4 for CD4-KKXX (1:1000, Sigma). Detection was performed after two washes
with PBS and one hour of incubation with secondary antibodies: chicken anti-mouse
Alexa Fluor 594, goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (1:1000, ThermoFisher
Scientific) and the nuclear dye DAPI (1:500, Sigma) diluted in the blocking
buffer. Control experiments were performed by omitting the primary antibodies.
2.6 Imaging
Labeled cardiomyocytes were observed with an Olympus epifluorescent microscope
(60). Images were acquired with a CoolSnap camera (Ropper Scientific)
and analyzed with Metamorph software (Molecular devices) equipped with a
3D-deconvolution module. For each sample, series of consecutive plans were
acquired (sectioning step: 0.2 m).
2.7 Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means SEM. Statistical significance was estimated
with SigmaPlot® software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose,
California, USA) by Student’s t-test or ANOVA, as appropriate. p 0.05 was considered significant.
3. Results
3.1 Both R878C and G1743R Mutations Abolished I
Na currents were recorded in HEK293 cells 36 h after transfection with WT
or mutant channels. As previously reported, R878C abolished I density
compared to WT channels [12, 13], and G1743R led to an extremely small current
(–1.4 0.8 pA/pF, n = 10) (Fig. 1A and Table 1) [14].
Fig. 1.
Electrophysiological characterization of BrS mutants expressed
alone or with WT channels to mimic patients heterozygosity. (A) I
representative Na-current traces measured in HEK 293 cells expressing WT,
R878C, G1743R WT + R878C or WT + G1743R channels. (B) Current-voltage
relationships. (C) Voltage-dependence of activation recorded from HEK 293 cells
expressing WT or WT + G1743R. Note that, as opposed to cells co-expressing WT +
R878C, WT + G1743R cells displayed an acute decrease in I defining a
dominant-negative effect of mutant channels on WT ones. Furthermore, we observed
a significant shift of the voltage-dependent activation in presence of G1743R.
Table 1.Kinetics properties of I recorded in HEK293 cells
transfected with Na1.5 WT and mutants.
Na channels |
Peak current density (pA/pF) |
V activation (mV) |
V inactivation (mV) |
t (ms) |
WT |
–282 31 (n = 22) |
–44.2 1.2 (n = 17) |
–85 8 (n = 12) |
0.55 0.01 (n = 13) |
R878C |
–0.2 0.04 (n = 9) *** |
na |
na |
na |
G1743R |
–1.4 0.8 (n = 10) *** |
na |
na |
na |
WT + R878C |
–143 26 (n = 18) ** |
–36.6 0.9 (n = 12) *** |
–83.6 1 (n = 13) ns |
nd |
WT + G1743R |
–53 9 (n = 11) *** |
–33.2 1.1 (n = 11) ** |
nd |
nd |
G1743R + mexiletine |
–15.7 2.3 (n = 6) *** |
–27.3 5.7 (n = 6) *** |
nd |
nd |
G1743R + R878C |
–25.9 3.9 (n = 13) *** |
–24.2 3.7 (n = 11) *** |
nd |
nd |
∆Cter |
–81 17 (n = 13) *** |
–41.3 2 (n = 12) ns |
–104 4 (n = 13) *** |
1.13 0.05 (n = 13) *** |
∆Cter + R878C |
nd |
nd |
–105 6 (n = 15) *** |
0.9 0.02 (n = 15) *** |
Data are presented as means SEM. Peak current density is given at –20
mV. WT indicates wild type, nd, not determined; na, not applicable; and ns, not
significant. *p 0.05, ** p 0.01, *** p 0.001 compared to WT channels. |
3.2 G1743R Channels Led to A Dominant-Negative Impairment of
I, But R878C Channels Did Not
Earlier, we have demonstrated that mutant-Na1.5 channels could exert a
dominant-negative effect on WT channels by retention of WT/mutant interacting
complexes within the ER [3]. We therefore explored here whether R878C or G1743R
mutants had a dominant-negative effect on WT channels. To mimic the heterozygous
state of BrS patients, cells were co-transfected with WT and R878C or G1743R
mutant channels in a 1:1 ratio. As previously shown [3], co-expression of R878C
with WT channels led to 50% of the WT current (–143 26 pA/pF, n = 18
compared to WT alone: –282 31 pA/pF, n = 22) (Fig. 1A and B and Table 1). In contrast, when co-expressed with WT channels, G1743R led to an acute
(75%) loss of I (–53 9 pA/pF, n = 11 compared to WT
alone: –282 31 pA/pF, n = 22), illustrating a dominant-negative effect.
Interestingly, the V of the voltage-dependent activation was shifted
towards positive values by 10.5 mV when G1743R and WT channels were co-expressed
(–33.2 1.1 mV, n = 11), compared to WT alone (–44.2 1.2 mV, n =
22), suggesting that the presence of the G1743R mutant impairs the WT-channel’s
proper gating (Fig. 1C and Table 1). In contrast, the V of steady-state
inactivation remained unaffected (Table 1).
3.3 G1743R Channels Led to Dominant-Negative Impairment of I
by Retention of Mutant Proteins Within the Endoplasmic Reticulum
We assessed here whether the G1743R mutant channel’s subcellular localization
may contribute to its dominant-negative effect on WT channels. Rat neonatal
cardiomyocytes (RNC) transfected with GFP-tagged channels were labeled with an
anti-GFP antibody to assess channel localization. G1743R strongly co-localized
with CD4 carrying the KKXX motif of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention,
suggesting that the mutant is mainly retained inside ER in myocytes and very
poorly expressed at the cell surface, as opposed to WT channels (Fig. 2). This
result is in line with the previous study by Valdivia and coworkers who showed
that the G1743R channel was mainly trapped within intracellular compartments in
HEK293 cells [14]. Altogether, our results suggest that the subcellular retention
of mutated G1743R channels contributed to their dominant-negative effect on WT
channels. As previously reported, the R878C mutant channel was properly expressed
at the plasma membrane of transfected cells [12].
Fig. 2.
Immunocytostaining of overexpressed G1743R-Na1.5 channels
in RNC. Representative 3-dimensional deconvolution images (n = 5) of RNC
co-transfected with GFP-Na1.5 (green) and CD4-KKXX (red). Nuclei were
stained with DAPI (blue). (A, B and C) Na1.5 WT, (D, E and F) G1743R. Note
that in the merged image (C) Na1.5 WT is mostly expressed at the plasma
membrane, as opposed to CD4-KKXX, which is retained in the ER. In contrast, the
G1743R mutant merged image (F) showed numerous internal yellow dots, indicating
that Na1.5 mutant channels were mostly retained in the ER, similarly to
CD4-KKXX. Scale bar: 10 m.
3.4 R878C Channels Transcomplemented G1743R Mutant’s Trafficking to
Rescue I
We have previously demonstrated a mechanism whereby Na channel
-subunits were able to transcomplement each other by interacting with
each other, to rescue trafficking-deficient Na1.5 mutants [3]. To assess
whether the trafficking-competent R878C channels were able to rescue the
trafficking-deficient G1743R ones, we co-expressed both non-functional mutant
channels in HEK293 cells. Notably, cells co-expressing R878C and G1743R channels
displayed current densities (–25.9 3.9 pA/pF, n = 13) that were never
recorded when the G1743R-mutant channels were expressed alone (–1.4 0.8
pA/pF, n = 10) (Fig. 3). This rescued I represented 19 times
I displayed by G1743R expressed alone, half of the current
recorded in WT + G1743R transfected cells, twice the G1743R current
rescued by mexiletine and 9% of the current recorded with WT channels
alone (Fig. 3A and B and Table 1), suggesting that a mechanism of
transcomplementation of trafficking-deficient mutant channels by
trafficking-competent ones contributed to restore I.
Fig. 3.
Cooperation of Na1.5-mutant channels to rescue I.
(A) I representative traces and (B) current-voltage relationships
measured in HEK 293 cells expressing R878C, G1743R or both channels in a 1:1
ratio. In panel (A), 0.1 ms was omitted on current traces for the capacitance
transient. (C) Voltage-dependent activation of cells expressing WT, WT + G1743R
or R878C + G1743R. Mex, mexiletine. Note that the rescued current carried by
R878C + G1743R mutants remained shifted positively by 19.5 mV when compared to WT
channels expressed alone and by 9 mV when compared to WT + G1743R channels, to
the same extent as mexiletine-rescued G1743R current.
3.5 G1743R Channels Transcomplemented R878C Mutant’s Gating to
Rescue I
In recent studies [6, 11], we reported that dominant negative effect of mutant
Na1.5 channels was not only exerted through trafficking but that coupled
gating could also be involved. This led us to hypothesize that such gating
transcomplementation could, conversely, rescue I. Indeed, we observed
that, when R878C + G1743R were co-expressed, the voltage-dependent activation of
the rescued current was drastically shifted by +19.5 mV (Fig. 3C and Table 1),
suggesting that G1743R alone may not gate properly and would explain the +9
mV-shift of voltage dependence of activation in presence of WT channels (G1743R +
WT) (Fig. 3C and Table 1). It is worth to note that the rescued R878C + G1743R
current activation was positively shifted in the same extent as the G1743R
current rescued by mexiletine (Fig. 3C and Table 1). These observations support a
cooperative gating between both non-functional channels.
3.6 R878C Channels Transcomplemented Cter Mutant’s
Inactivation Kinetics
In order to confirm that a cooperative mechanism at the gating level could
rescue I, we designed another Na1.5-construct missing its C-terminus
and co-expressed this trafficking-efficient Cter channel displaying a
drastic negative shift of steady-state inactivation as well as very slow
inactivation kinetics (Fig. 4A), with the trafficking-efficient but
gating-deficient R878C channel. We investigated inactivation properties, i.e.
steady state inactivation (V) and inactivation kinetics
( and ) of Na1.5 WT, Cter and
Cter + R878C expressed in HEK293 cells. Strikingly, the fast
inactivation kinetics in cells expressing Cter + R878C channels
( = 0.90 0.02 ms, n = 15 vs 0.55 0.01 ms, n = 13
in WT) was significantly rescued compared to cells expressing Cter
alone ( = 1.13 0.05 ms, n = 13) (Fig. 4C and Table 1).
This result demonstrated that the presence of the full C-terminus of R878C
channels was able to rescue some of the inactivation kinetics parameters of
Cter channels, suggesting a cooperative mechanism at the gating level
between these two mutant channels.
Fig. 4.
Coupled-gating of Na1.5-mutant channels to rescue
I. (A) Representative I traces at –10 mV. (B) Steady-state
inactivation. (C) Fast and slow inactivation kinetics of I. Note that the
presence of R878C significantly rescued Cter I fast inactivation
decay (). *** = p 0.001 when compared to
Cter expressed alone. These results were strongly supporting that R878C
C-terminus played a role in the inactivation decay of Cter.
Slow inactivation kinetics (Cter + R878C: 5.4 0.3 ms vs
Cter: 5.5 0.2 ms) and steady-state inactivation (Cter
+ R878C: V = –105 6 mV; Cter: V = –104
4 mV; WT: V = –85 8 mV) remained unchanged (Fig. 4B and
4C and Table 1). Also, WT + R878C fast inactivation kinetics were comparable to
WT expressed alone [10].
4. Discussion
For years, the Na channel -subunits were thought to be monomers
acting as independent functional entities, as opposed to K channels that
assemble into tetramers to be functional. However, we recently established that
Na channels were able to interact and form functional dimers [3, 10, 11]. We
also demonstrated that voltage-gated Na channels display coupled gating
properties [6, 10, 11], a central mechanism for proper propagation of the action
potential in cardiac cells. So far, such a gating cooperation has been described
to explain a dominant-negative effect of mutant non-functional Na1.5
channels on WT channels [6, 10, 11]. The novelty of the present study is to delve
further into the cooperative mechanisms between Na1.5 -subunits
to test whether this mechanism would be efficient to rescue I from
non-functional mutant channels. To do so, we used the Cter construct
missing the -subunit C-terminus and two well-documented pathogenic
variants, G1743R and R878C, identified in BrS and sick sinus syndrome patients,
both abolishing I but by two different pathways: G1743R mainly by
retention of the channel within the endoplasmic reticulum and R878C by
gating-deficiency while normally trafficking to the membrane [12, 13, 14].
Our results showed that trafficking-competent but gating-deficient channels were
able to rescue a small Na current from gating-competent but
trafficking-deficient channels. This breakthrough is crucial to better understand
Na channel pathophysiology and contributes to explain the
genotype-phenotype discordance often observed in BrS family members carrying
Na-channel pathogenic variants.
4.1 G1743R and R878C Mutants Both Abolished I Through
Different Mechanisms
We and others have established that R878C mutation abolished I by a
gating deficiency, in accordance with its location in the pore of the second
domain of Na1.5 [3, 12, 13]. It was also documented that this mutant channel
normally reaches the cell membrane [12, 13]. On another hand, G1743R led to the
quasi-total abolition of I because of a trafficking deficiency, since in
HEK293 cells, G1743R mutant was shown to be poorly addressed to the plasma
membrane even when its trafficking was partially rescued by mexiletine [14]. Our
present study explored further this mechanism and showed that, in rat neonatal
cardiomyocytes, G1743R mostly co-localized with CD4-KKXX, a protein carrying an
ER-retention motif. Moreover, it was noteworthy that, similarly to N-terminal
mutant channels we previously characterized [3], G1743R led to a
dominant-negative effect on WT channels through an acute retention of the
WT/mutant complexes within the ER (Fig. 2). These results strongly support our
hypothesis that trafficking-deficient mutants are likely to exert a
dominant-negative effect by an interaction between Na1.5
-subunits, as early as ER compartments.
Both G1743R and R878C loss-of-function mutations have been associated with BrS
and sick sinus syndrome [12, 13, 14]. However, the cellular mechanisms leading to one
pathology or another remained ununderstood and even though each mutant
overexpression resulted in the abolition of I, the intrinsic mechanisms
seemed radically different and may play a key role in these arrhythmia’s
phenotypic expression. Indeed, numerous reports have shown that a single
Na1.5 mutation could induce various combinations of clinical phenotypes
[15].
4.2 G1743R and R878C Mutants Cooperated in Trafficking
For the purpose of this study, we used an heterologous model of overexpression
of two non-functional channels displaying none to extremely little currents in
order to unequivocally demonstrate the rescue of I. Indeed, in absence of
any other Na channel in HEK 293 cells, the recorded I was
necessarily the product of the non-functional mutant’s expression. As shown in
Fig. 2, the G1743R channels expressed alone were mostly retained in the ER,
leading to an almost undetectable I. But we demonstrated here that the
trafficking-competent R878C channel, incapable of producing any current because
of gating deficiency, drove the G1743R channel to the cell surface; this
cooperation leading to a partial rescue of I (Fig. 3). However, we could
not exclude that R878C channels could not modify the rescued G1743R channels’
kinetics. In the same way, it has to be considered that the G1743R channels
likely exerts a dominant-negative effect on R878C trafficking-competent channels,
as on WT channels, but the balance rescue/dominant-negative effect seemed to
allow some G1743R channels to reach the cell surface.
The group of Dr. Deschenes demonstrated for the first time that co-expression of
the SCN5A polymorphism H558R with BrS mutations could restore their
trafficking defects to produce a small I [16, 17]. In the same line, we
published in 2012 that Na1.5 -subunits were capable of
interacting with each other and that this interaction was responsible for, either
a dominant-negative effect of BrS mutants on WT channels, or a
transcomplementation of trafficking-deficient mutants [3]. Such a cooperation
between Na1.5-channel -subunits was new in the field of Na
channels but this concept of transcomplementation had been explored in the past
in the area of CFTR [18, 19, 20] and other channels [21]. Altogether, these studies
provide evidence that ion channel -subunits are able to cooperate to
rescue their trafficking defects and produce a current.
4.3 Dysfunctional Channels Cooperated With WT and With Each Other In
Gating
In this work, our first argument in favor of a gating cooperation between
Na1.5 -subunits was the fact that, in cells co-expressing WT and
G1743R channels, the voltage-dependence of activation was shifted towards
positive voltages, amplifying the loss-of-function of I (Fig. 1C).
Secondly, the voltage-dependence of activation was even more shifted when the
R878C non-conducting mutant was co-expressed with G1743R (Fig. 3C). As already
observed with some N-terminal mutant channels [3], these results suggested that
once the trafficking-deficient G1743R channels reached the cell surface through a
cooperation between -subunits, the voltage-dependence of activation of
the channel complex is affected by the mutant channel kinetics. Indeed, if both
G1743R and R878C channels were gating independently from each other, the
voltage-dependent activation of cells co-expressing the mutant channels would be
identical to G1743R, since R878C is not conducting.
At this point of our study, we could neither demonstrate nor exclude a
cooperative gating between mutant channels occurring in addition of the observed
trafficking cooperation. To this end, we co-expressed the trafficking-competent
Cter channel displaying a drastic negative shift of steady state
inactivation as well as very slow inactivation kinetics (Fig. 4A), with the
trafficking-competent but gating-deficient R878C channel. Strikingly, we
demonstrated that even if not conducting, the R878C channel was able to partially
rescue the fast inactivation decay of the Cter channel (Fig. 4C). This
important finding demonstrated that the C-terminus of one -subunit can
play an important role in inactivation of the other -subunit of the
dimer. This result is in accordance with the work from Gabelli et al.
[22] presenting a crystal structure of the C-terminus of Na1.5. The authors
proposed the formation of an asymmetric homodimer where both inactivation state
and kinetics are regulated by a complex protein-protein interaction involving the
heterotrimer calmodulin/FGF13/Na1.5-C-terminus. Our results strongly
support the idea that the presence of the gating-deficient channel R878C is
capable of rescuing the inactivation kinetics of Cter channels, but we
can only speculate that this occurred by Na1.5-C-terminus domain swapping,
as reported for other ion channels [23], to regulate fast inactivation of other
-subunits. Further studies will be needed to decipher these types of
mechanisms, which are crucial to understand, as they most likely play a key role
in the pathophysiology of Na channelopathies. Another interesting point of
discussion comes from the observation that R878C channels were able to partially
rescue the fast inactivation decay of Cter channels but had no effect
on slow inactivation (Fig. 4C). It is well established that the fast inactivation
is regulated by the DIII-DIV linker and the C-terminus, while the slow
inactivation process is mainly regulated by the C-terminus allowing to lock the
channel into its closed state. According to the 3D conformation structure and the
“lollipop” model from Gabelli et al. [22], the interaction between the
two C-termini plays a crucial role to lock the channel into its closed state,
which is impossible when the C-terminus is deleted as in Cter. We could
therefore speculate that the lack of the C-terminus of Cter channels
would not allow the dimers to enter a stable closed state allowing late
re-openings.
As reported recently in the excellent review from Dixon et al. [24],
many recent experimental findings provided evidence that several classes of ion
channels appear to open and close in a coordinated, cooperative manner.
Considering the cardiac Na channel Na1.5, we published the first
evidence that the BrS Na1.5-L325R mutant dimerized with WT channels and led
to a dominant negative effect by coupled gating [11]. In the past, several
studies have suggested cooperative gating of Na channels [25, 26], e.g.,
Aldrich et al. [25] noted a tendency for even number of channels to
occur within a patch during single-channel recordings. Naundorf et al.
[27] also reported that the sharp action potential upstroke could not be
explained without channels cooperation. A recent work from Zheng et al. [6] suggested that the heart failure-associated splice variant
Na1.5-G1642X suppresses Na current in heart failure patients by
preventing the dimers from gating cooperatively. Finally, variants in
Na1.7, which resulted in an alteration of the channel function when
expressed alone, were rescued by their interaction with the WT
-subunits [28]. Very recently, the group of Dr. Kucera modeled the
interactions between Na channels in order to examine their consequences on
channel kinetics and confirmed that, if the question remains open how variants
interacting with WT channels affect the Na current, the condition where a
variant channel potentiates the current generated by the WT leading to a gain of
function, is conceivable [29].
4.4 What Consequences for the Field of Arrhythmias?
The wide variety of mutations and variants in SCN5A leads to a wide
severity of I dysfunction and modifications of biophysical properties. A
single nucleotide variation can be associated with a decrease of trafficking, but
may also affect channel biophysical properties. Thus, in vitro
functional studies remain key to classify the pathogenicity of SCN5A
variants leading to cardiac arrhythmias [30]. Hence, we can easily imagine some
mutations with a loss of current density due to a moderate loss of trafficking,
but a gain of late I specific to long QT syndrome. Such a mutation
expressed with the WT may not lead to a significant loss of peak I due to
a transcomplementation mechanism, but may display a significant late I,
leading to a long QT syndrome phenotype. As an example, the R1860GfsX12
gain- and loss-of-function mutation in SCN5A underlies a complex
clinical phenotype and led to a host of loss and gain of function features when
expressed alone: lack of trafficking, partial degradation and drastic shift of
the voltage-dependent inactivation. But, when co-expressed with WT channels, the
heterozygous state displayed no major loss of peak I and only an atrial
phenotype was reported with no ventricular phenotype in affected family members
[31].
As also detailed in a recent publication showing that a majority of
loss-of-function variants in SCN5A exert a dominant-negative effect on
WT Na1.5 channels [8], these findings reinforce the importance of
co-expressing the two allele products of a patient in expression studies, as
expression of only the mutated allele can conceal the true mutant effect leading
to the patient’s phenotype. Elucidating transcomplementation mechanisms could
also clarify the low penetrance or the overlap syndrome often observed in related
SCN5A-mutation carriers. We must consider the possibility that two
alleles expressed together may not have the expected result of
haploinsufficiency, and that mechanisms of cooperation may lead to a wide variety
of phenotypes.