Background: Biofortification of vegetables with selenium (Se) greatly
depends on species tolerance to Se supply. Due to the scant information regarding
kohlrabi Se biofortification, the aim of the present work was the evaluation of
foliar sodium selenate application on yield and biochemical characteristics of
three kohlrabi cultivars.
Material and methods: A two years field experiment was conducted in
Moscow region (Russia) on 3 kohlrabi cultivars using foliar biofortification with
Na
Improvement of functional food yield is one of the most urgent aims of modern
agriculture. In this respect, the practice of vegetable biofortification with
essential macro- and microelements has been gaining an increasing popularity [1]
due to the possibility to optimize human nutrition and stimulate plant growth and
development. Among trace elements, Se is one of the most attractive ones, due to
its significant beneficial effects on human health, providing a protection
against viral and cardiovascular diseases, and cancer [2], also showing the
ability to improve plant resistance to different forms of biotic and abiotic
stresses [3]. Another benefit of agrochemical biofortification with Se is
connected with the ability of plants to convert the most toxic inorganic Se salts
to biologically active organic derivatives with remarkable health improving
properties [3]. Furthermore, the significant sensitivity of plants to high Se
levels makes them act as a buffer preventing the occurrence of human Se
toxicosis. Such an approach is not simple, because each plant species has a
certain tolerance degree to high levels of Se [4]. Being a chemical analog of
sulfur, Se freely substitutes this element in biological systems, which makes
Brassicaceae family a positive target of Se biofortification, due to the plant
ability to accumulate high levels of sulfur. Furthermore, Brassica
species are capable to synthetize powerful anti-carcinogens: selenomethyl
selenocystein and
The aim of the present research was the evaluation of the effects of different Se dose applications on yield and biochemical characteristics of three kohlrabi cultivars.
A research was conducted in 2018 and 2019, from April to July, at the
experimental field of the Federal Scientific Center of Vegetable Production,
Moscow region, Russia (Moscow region, 55
Month | 2018 | 2019 | ||
Mean temperature ( |
Rainfall (mm) | Mean temperature ( |
Rainfall (mm) | |
May | 16.2 | 61 | 16.3 | 57 |
June | 17.3 | 56 | 19.6 | 64 |
July | 20.5 | 92 | 16.8 | 69 |
On 23 April, kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes)
seeds of the hybrids Sonata F
Marketable yield was determined of undamaged and regular-shaped stems not exceeding 600 g weight.
After harvesting and removing soil particles from roots and stems, the two
latter plant parts were separated from each other, washed with water and dried
with filter paper, and then individually weighed as well as the leaves. Samples
were homogenized and fresh homogenates of stems were used for the determination
of nitrates, total sugar, monosaccharides and ascorbic acid, while leaf
homogenates were used only for the determination of ascorbic acid concentration.
Sample aliquots of roots, stems and leaves were dried at 70
The dry matter was assessed gravimetrically by drying the samples in an oven at
70
DM (%) = 100
where W
Water soluble protein levels were detected spectrophotometrically using the
Bradford method based on utilization of Coomassie Brilliant Blue 250 and 0.05 M
Tris buffer, at pH 8 [12]. Half a g of homogenized stem powder was accurately
ground in a mortar with 15 mL of freshly prepared Tris buffer and left at room
temperature for phases separation (about 1 h). One hundred
Nitrates were assessed using ion selective electrode on ionomer Expert-001 (Econix, Moscow, Russia). The results were expressed in mg/kg fresh weight.
The monosaccharides were determined using the ferricyanide colorimetric method based on the reaction of monosaccharides with potassium ferricyanide [13]. The total sugars were analogically determined after acidic hydrolysis of water extracts with 20% hydrochloric acid. The disaccharides content was calculated as a difference between total sugar and monosaccharides contents. Fructose was used as an external standard. The results were expressed in %.
The ascorbic acid content was determined by visual titration of leaf and stem extracts in 3% trichloracetic acid with sodium 2.6-dichlorophenol indophenolate solution (Tillmans reagent) [14]. Roots were not taken into consideration due to low ascorbic acid content. Three grams of fresh stem/leaves homogenates were homogenized in a porcelain mortar with 5 mL of 3% trichloracetic acid and quantitatively transferred to a measuring cylinder. The volume was brought to 60 mL using trichloracetic acid, and the mixture was filtered through filter paper 15 min later. The concentration of ascorbic acid was determined from the amount of Tillmans reagent that went into the sample titration.
Total polyphenols were determined in 70% ethanol extract using the
Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method as previously described [15]. One gram of
dry kohlrabi homogenates was extracted with 20 mL of 70% ethanol at 80
The antioxidant activity of kohlrabi roots, stems and leaves was assessed using
a redox titration method [15] via titration of 0.01 N KMnO
Se was analyzed using the fluorimetric method previously described for tissues
and biological fluids [16]. About 0.1 g of dried homogenized samples were
digested via sequential heating with a mixture of 1.5 mL nitric-perchloric acids
(10 : 7, v/v) at 120
Biofortification level (BL) was calculated according to the equation:
BL = C
where C
Data were processed by analysis of variance and mean separations were performed
through the Duncan multiple range test, with reference to 0.05 probability level,
using SPSS software version 21 (Armonk, NY, USA). Data expressed as a percentage
were subjected to angular transformation before performing statistical
processing: Y = arcsine
Improvement of yield is considered to be a paramount issue in vegetable
production. Out of the three kohlrabi cultivars tested, White Vienna 1390 was
characterized by the highest stem biomass, while Dobrynya F
Parameter | Treatment | Sonata F |
Dobrynya F |
White Vienna 1390 |
Total plant biomass (kg) | control | 1.02d | 0.98d | 1.09d |
Se 50 | 1.18cd | 1.16cd | 1.24c | |
Se 75 | 1.64a | 1.48ab | 1.76a | |
Se 100 | 1.35bc | 1.27c | 1.41b | |
Mean stem weight (kg) | control | 0.46e | 0.39f | 0.60cd |
Se 50 | 0.50de | 0.42ef | 0.67abc | |
Se 75 | 0.74ab | 0.61bcd | 0.81a | |
Se 100 | 0.53d | 0.45c | 0.67abc | |
Marketable yield (t/ha) | control | 21.1efg | 18.3g | 27.8cd |
Se 50 | 23.5ef | 19.9fg | 31.2bc | |
Se 75 | 35.0ab | 29.0cd | 38.1a | |
Se 100 | 25.1cd | 20.9fg | 31.4b | |
Total yield (t/ha) | control | 21.7ef | 18.8f | 28.7d |
Se 50 | 23.9e | 20.2ef | 31.8bc | |
Se 75 | 35.3ab | 29.2cd | 38.4a | |
Se 100 | 25.4de | 21.2ef | 31.9bc | |
For each parameter, values with the same letters do not differ significantly
according to Duncan test at p |
An outstanding feature of kohlrabi plants was the close relationship between
stem yield and Se dose, the latter being applied at higher concentrations in the
present research, compared to that used (23.6 mg/L) to kohlrabi sprouts by Golob
et al. [11], i.e., 50–100 mg Na
The data reported in Table 2 indicate that Se biofortification resulted in
statistically significant increase of kohlrabi biomass, stem total and marketable
yield and a significant decrease of non-marketable stem fraction (Table 2). In
particular, the highest beneficial effect was recorded at the Se concentration
level of 75 mg/L leading to stem weight increase of 61.0% for Sonata F
Though foliar application of 100 mg/L solution of sodium selenate resulted in
lower kohlrabi yield than those produced by Se 75 solution supply, the values
were higher than those obtained for control plants. Between the three cultivars
tested, Sonata F
The growth stimulation effect of Se has been described for many agricultural
crops, indicating significant species and varietal differences in plant tolerance
to high levels of Se [3]. The growth-promoting response to Se was demonstrated
for some Brassica species, such as broccoli [17], canola [18], Indian
mustard [19]. Foliar application of sodium selenate to broccoli [17] elicited a
yield increase by 39% under 10 mg/L selenate solution and by 25% with 100 mg/L
application. Foliar biofortification of Indian mustard with sodium selenate 50
mg/L resulted in 54% yield increase [19]. In the present research, the highest
yield increase was recorded for Sonata F
Interestingly, Se application had no significant effects on dry matter content
of stems, leaves and roots (Table 3), which is in accordance with the results
previously obtained in broccoli treated with 0 to 100 mg Na
Parameter | Plant part | F |
F |
White Vienna 1390 |
Stem | 7.84 |
8.78 |
9.19 | |
Dry matter (%) | Leaves | 12.93 |
14.5 |
14.10 |
Roots | 27.70 |
25.25 |
27.63 | |
WSP (% d.w.) | Stem | 2.20 |
2.09 |
2.12 |
Nitrates (mg/kg f.w.) | Stem | 190.0 |
162.3 |
207.5 |
Leaves | 142.5 |
131.7 |
122.5 | |
WSP, water soluble proteins; f.w., fresh weight; d.w., dry weight. Along each
line, values with the same letters do not differ significantly according to
Duncan test at p |
Se is closely connected with nitrogen metabolism, by stimulating the amino acid
biosynthesis and increasing the nitrate reductase activity [21]. Indeed, selenate
supply decreased nitrate levels and enhanced nitrate reductase activity in
sunflower [22], Indian mustard [19], lettuce [23, 24], potato [25] and wheat [26].
Contrary, in the present research Se biofortification of kohlrabi did not affect
nitrate levels (Table 3). The controversial aforementioned outcomes may be
referred to the fact that nitrate accumulation under Se supply may greatly vary
depending on plant hormonal status [27, 28]. In the latter respect, nitrate
levels in spinach plants under sodium selenate treatment were reduced in female
Se-fortified plants and increased in male ones [28], and the leaves/stems nitrate
distribution was rather similar to that recorded with the hybrids Sonata F
Furthermore, despite the described relationship between Se and amino acids metabolism [19, 20, 21] no significant effect of Se biofortification was recorded on water soluble protein accumulation in kohlrabi stems (Table 2), which was about 30% of the total protein level reported in literature [29].
The results of the present study indicate that in the open field conditions of
European Russia the di/monosaccharides ratio in kohlrabi stems is in the range
from 1.8 to 2.5, which is in agreement with the data of Ben Sassi et al.
[29]. The beneficial effect of Se on carbohydrate metabolism was revealed earlier
in potato [30], wheat [31] and canola [32]. Up to date, scant information is
available on the effect of Se on carbohydrate accumulation in Brassicaceae
species. The present results indicate the high stimulating effect of Se on sugar
accumulation in kohlrabi stems (Table 4): at 100 Se dose the monosaccharides
content increased by 1.72 times in Sonata F
Parameter | Treatment | Sonata F |
Dobrynya F |
White Vienna 1390 |
Total sugars (% f.w.) | control | 36.5a | 30.1b | 33.9ab |
Se 50 | 38.6a | 34.9ab | 36.2a | |
Se 75 | 39.3a | 36.2a | 37.6a | |
Se 100 | 40.4a | 41.0a | 39.5a | |
Monosaccharides (% f.w.) | control | 16.4d | 16.7d | 13.8e |
Se 50 | 16.4d | 19.7b | 15.8de | |
Se 75 | 17.7cd | 22.2b | 28.4a | |
Se 100 | 28.2a | 26.5a | 30.9a | |
Disaccharides (% f.w.) | control | 20.1a | 13.4c | 20.1a |
Se 50 | 22.2a | 16.5b | 20.4a | |
Se 75 | 21.7a | 14bc | 9.2d | |
Se 100 | 12.2c | 14.5b | 8.6d | |
For each parameter, values with the same letters do not differ significantly
according to Duncan test at p |
Several studies have shown that the appropriate concentration of Se reinforced
the antioxidant defense system of plants [33, 34, 35]. In the latter respect, in
broccoli the Se growth promoting effect is supposed to be related to the
encouragement of plant protective ability against oxidative stress [17]. In the
present research, among the antioxidants studied only the ascorbic acid (AA)
levels were significantly enhanced by Se supply (Fig. 1A,B). Indeed, at the
highest dose of Se (Se 100) the stem AA concentration increased by 2.2 folds in
Sonata F
Interaction between Se dose and cultivar on ascorbic acid content in kohlrabi. (A) Ascorbic acid content in stems. (B) Ascorbic acid content in leaves. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p
Kohlrabi leaves showed higher levels of AA than stems, but the effect of Se
application did not significantly differ between leaves and stems (Fig. 1A).
Indeed, a statistically significant increase in AA biosynthesis in Sonata F
Contrary, unexpected low changes in total antioxidant activity and total polyphenols content were recorded in stems, leaves and roots of kohlrabi plants (Table 5), and indeed only the total polyphenols in kohlrabi stems were significantly affected (Fig. 2).
Effect of Se dose and cultivar on total phenolics content in kohlrabi stems. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p
Parameter | Plant part | F |
F |
White Vienna 1390 |
АОА (mg GAE/g d.w.) | Stems | 22.0 |
22.5 |
19.4 |
Leaves | 42.3 |
32.3 |
31.8 | |
Roots | 15.9 |
19.2 |
14.6 | |
Total phenolics (mg GAE/g d.w.) | Leaves | 22.7 |
20.0 |
23.8 |
Roots | 11.9 |
12.0 |
9.4 | |
Along each line, values with the same letters do not differ significantly
according to Duncan test at p |
Se biofortified Brassicaceae plants provide two important types of utilization: (i) as natural sources of highly bioavailable organic Se; (ii) as products with high levels of powerful anti-carcinogens: methylated derivatives of Se containing amino acids and Se containing glucosinolates [5, 39]. Within the Brassicaceae family, broccoli and kohlrabi are among the most and the least studied species respectively [5]. Based on the comparison between the Se accumulation ability of different Brassicaceae seedlings, kohlrabi sprouts showed low Se tolerance, ranking the eighth based on the ability to accumulate Se after kale, white cabbage, red cabbage, cauliflower, savoy cabbage, broccoli and Brussels [8]. Contrary, the present results indicate high prospects of kohlrabi biofortification with Se, and the data presented in Table 6 and Fig. 3 suggest high Se accumulation levels in kohlrabi along with the Se growth stimulation effect (Table 2). Generally, the highest level of Se was recorded in kohlrabi leaves and the lowest in roots.
Interaction between Se dose and cultivar on Se biofortification levels (BL) of kohlrabi plant parts. BL- biofortification level, indicating the intensity of Se accumulation by plant (see section 3.12). Within stems, leaves and roots, values with the same letters do not differ significantly according to Duncan test at p
Plant part | Treatment | Sonata F |
Dobrynya F |
White Vienna 1390 |
Stems | Control | 0.101g | 0.059g | 0.075g |
Se 50 | 1.085f | 1.414e | 0.789f | |
Se 75 | 2.321d | 1.703e | 2.319d | |
Se 100 | 4.400b | 3.532c | 5.206a | |
Leaves | Control | 0.104e | 0.083e | 0.061e |
Se 50 | 2.921c | 1.764d | 2.689c | |
Se 75 | 4.570b | 2.131d | 4.176b | |
Se 100 | 6.911a | 4.190b | 7.399a | |
Roots | Control | 0.132g | 0.119g | 0.108g |
Se 50 | 0.539f | 1.331d | 0.921e | |
Se 75 | 1.086e | 1.784c | 1.859c | |
Se 100 | 2.482b | 2.672b | 4.140a | |
For each plant part, values with the same letters do not differ significantly
according to Duncan test at p |
The consumption of 100 g of selenium biofortified kohlrabi fresh stems
associated to the Se 100 treatment may provide from 31 to 48
The leaves of biofortified kohlrabi may be used as Se-supplement to humans, due to higher antioxidant activity, ascorbic acid and Se content compared to stems, whereas biofortified kohlrabi roots may be suitable as a green Se containing fertilizer.
Summarizing the results of kohlrabi Se biofortification, special peculiarities of kohlrabi plants can be highlighted (Tables 2,7): (i) the highly positive correlations between Se and monosaccharides, ascorbic acid, TP and TS contents; (ii) the significant beneficial effect of the Se 75 treatment on stem weight. The aforementioned outcomes prove the practical importance of kohlrabi biofortification with Se, which provides both high yield and quality enhancement.
Other positive correlations arose between TP and AA, MS and TS, AA and both MS and TS content.
DM | NO |
Se | Weight | AOA | TP | AA | MS | TS | |
NO |
–0.437 | 1 | |||||||
Se | –0.243 | –0.176 | 1 | ||||||
Weight | 0.333 | 0.243 | 0.276 | 1 | |||||
AOA | –0.406 | –0.206 | –0.096 | –0.438 | 1 | ||||
TP | –0.558 | –0.234 | 0.720 |
0.016 | 0.385 | 1 | |||
AA | –0.077 | –0.297 | 0.842 |
0.330 | –0.093 | 0.663 |
1 | ||
MS | –0.021 | –0.311 | 0.898 |
0.270 | –0.181 | 0.659 |
0.728 |
1 | |
TS | –0.472 | 0.068 | 0.764 |
0.324 | 0.164 | 0.748 |
0.657 |
0.598 |
1 |
WSP | –0.141 | 0.064 | –0.017 | 0.158 | –0.032 | 0.274 | 0.225 | –0.081 | 0.384 |
DM, dry matter; NO |
The results of the present investigation allowed to reveal important peculiarities of kohlrabi Se biofortification, such as the increase of yield, monosaccharides and ascorbic acid content, as well as the existence of great variations between the Brassicaceae species in the reaction to biofortification. These outcomes suggest great prospects of biofortified stems and leaves utilization as important functional food with high Se and ascorbic acid content, as well as increased values of carbohydrates and polyphenols.
Conceptualization, NG, GC; data curation and formal analysis, MA, AT; investigation, NG, MA; methodology, NG, AT, AS; draft manuscript writing, NG, MA, GC; manuscript revision and final editing, NG, AS and GC. All authors have read and agreed with the final version of the manuscript to be published.
Not applicable.
The authors are grateful to L. Bondareva for providing kohlrabi seeds and to all the peer reviewers for their opinions and suggestions.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
AOA, total antioxidant activity; TP, total polyphenols; AA, ascorbic acid; DM,
dry matter; dw, dry weight; fw, fresh weight; MS, monosaccharides; TS, total
sugar; WSP, water soluble protein; NO