Academic Editor: Graham Pawelec and Linglin Xie
Background: Maternal diet and eating behaviors have the potential to
influence the metabolic milieu in pregnancies complicated by obesity, with
implications for the developmental programming of offspring obesity. Emerging
evidence suggests that mindfulness during eating may influence metabolic health
in non-pregnant populations, but its effects in the context of pregnancy is less
well understood. This study explored the individual and combined effects of
mindful eating and diet quality on metabolic outcomes among pregnant women with
obesity. Methods: In 46 pregnant women (body mas index
The prevalence of maternal obesity in pregnancy is steadily increasing in the US  and worldwide , which has significant implications for the intergenerational transfer of obesity risk. Pre-pregnancy obesity is associated with heightened insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), creating an adverse metabolic milieu for the developing fetus . The excess availability of maternal metabolic substrates promotes fetal overgrowth, higher infant birthweight and adiposity, and risk for childhood obesity . The combination of maternal obesity and excess gestational weight gain (GWG) has been shown to further exacerbate risk for offspring obesity . However, gain in maternal adiposity (fat mass) rather than absolute weight gain, is a more sensitive predictor of the metabolic milieu that influences fetal growth and infant adiposity [6, 7, 8], yet this measure is rarely considered in clinical research.
Clinical trials targeting improvements to the maternal diet among pregnant women with overweight and obesity have largely focused on the composition of the diet rather than eating behaviors, including mindful attention, awareness, and limiting distractions during meals. Eating mindlessly under the influence of external cues and the rewarding value of hyperpalatable foods overrides homeostatic signals for hunger and satiety, leading to overconsumption and weight gain . While classical dietary modification approaches have demonstrated some success in limiting GWG , they have largely failed to prevent GDM, large-for-gestational age births, [11, 12] or to reduce childhood adiposity . Past trials have also neglected to measure effects on maternal fat mass gain. This suggests that modest changes in maternal energy intake are insufficient to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes, and that diet quality and its behavioral influences must be considered more prominently.
Currently, there is lack of consensus on what constitutes the optimal diet for ensuring a healthy metabolic state in pregnancy . The dietary inflammatory index (DII), a measure of the inflammatory potential of the diet , may hold promise as a new tool for informing future prenatal dietary interventions. Recent observational studies in pregnancy cohorts spanning the full range of maternal BMI demonstrate a positive association between the DII and levels of inflammatory cytokines , incidence of GDM , and neonatal adiposity . While maternal obesity is associated with consuming a diet of higher inflammatory potential , the metabolic effects (e.g., glucose intolerance, gain in fat mass) of this dietary pattern among pregnant women exclusively with obesity has not yet been studied.
The maternal diet and metabolic milieu in pregnancy are also influenced by psychological factors [19, 20], thereby representing an important and complementary pathway to include in interventions designed to improve maternal and offspring health. Yet, a paucity of prenatal intervention studies targeting maternal psychological state report on metabolic or diet-related outcomes . Mindfulness and mindful eating have been found to exert beneficial effects on eating behaviors  and glycemic control  in non-pregnant, high metabolic risk populations. The potential for mindfulness approaches to influence weight and fat mass gain and other metabolic outcomes in the context of pregnancy requires further investigation.
The aim of this study is to determine the individual and combined associations of mindful eating and the DII across pregnancy on total weight and adiposity gain, as well as markers of insulin resistance [homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)] and hunger levels (ghrelin) in late gestation, among pregnant women with obesity.
This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study designed to assess determinants of GWG in pregnant women with obesity [24, 25]. Maternal assessments were performed between 13 and 16 weeks (‘early’), and between 35 and 37 weeks (‘late’) gestation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pennington Biomedical Research Center and University of California, Irvine. Participants provided written informed consent prior to participating.
Women aged 18 to 40 years, with obesity (BMI
Early pregnancy BMI was calculated from maternal weight and height measured at
Fasting blood samples were collected in the morning following a standardized dinner and 12-hour fast in late gestation. Blood was drawn into a red-top tube without additive, transported on ice and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes for measurement of glucose (DXC600; Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) and insulin (ELISA, Immulite 2000; Siemens, Broussard, LA, USA). A second sample was drawn into a purple-top EDTA tube, mixed with protease cocktail inhibitor, transported on ice and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes for measurement of total and active ghrelin (RIA; MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). HOMA-IR was computed according to the formula: [fasting glucose (mg/dL)*fasting insulin (uU/mL)]/405 .
Mindfulness towards eating was assessed with the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ) which has been validated in pregnant women . The MEQ explores mindfulness across five subscales, including disinhibition, awareness, external cues, emotional response, and distraction . Mindful eating refers to an unbiased awareness of sensations around eating. Disinhibition measures the inability to stop eating even when full. The awareness subscale measures an individual’s awareness of the sensory aspects of eating. Distraction refers to the tendency to think about other things and rush while eating. The external cues subscale refers to eating in response to environmental cues, and emotional response refers to eating in response to negative emotions. Higher scores within each subscale and in the total score are indicative of mindful eating.
Participants captured their dietary intake in real-time using remote food
photography over seven days at each assessment, as previously described [30, 31].
Reported energy intake was compared to total daily energy expenditure measured by
doubly labeled water and days with reported energy that was
Descriptive statistics were used to describe maternal characteristics and the
distributions of the predictor (MEQ, DII) and outcome variables (GWG/week, fat
mass gain/week, HOMA-IR, ghrelin). The distribution for all variables was
inspected using histograms and HOMA-IR and ghrelin were log-transformed for
normality. As there was no significant difference in MEQ and DII scores between
early and late gestation, mean values were computed and used in analyses.
Bivariate associations between the mean pregnancy MEQ score and its subscales,
DII, and baseline maternal characteristics were analyzed by Pearson’s
correlations. Associations between the total and subscale MEQ scores and outcome
variables were tested by linear regression, before and after adjusting for
a priori-defined covariates (maternal age, early-pregnancy BMI, parity,
race, DII). To correct for multiple testing, a false discovery rate (FDR) of less
than 5% was used as the significance level . A FDR correction was applied to
the analyses of the MEQ total score with outcome variables (4 tests) and to the
analyses of the 5 MEQ subscales with 4 outcome variables (20 tests). To test
effect modification of mindful eating on outcome variables by the DII, the
product of the DII and MEQ scores at each assessment was computed and entered
into the linear regression models. All analyses were performed with SPSS for
Macintosh, version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and results were considered
statistically significant at the level of p
Seventy-two participants were enrolled in the parent study. For this analysis,
complete data on MEQ, dietary intakes, and metabolic outcomes were available for
forty-six participants (Table 1). The majority of our cohort was either
non-Hispanic Black (47%) or non-Hispanic White (45%), which is representative
of the maternal population in the state of Louisiana . The mean BMI on
enrollment was 36.5
Across gestation, 28% of participants reported a decrease in their total MEQ
score (mean difference: –0.18
|Maternal Characteristic||Mean |
|Maternal age (years)||28.3 |
|Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m
|Class 1 obesity [N (%)]||26 (43.3)|
|Class 2 obesity [N (%)]||22 (36.7)|
|Class 3 obesity [N (%)]||12 (20.0)|
|Primiparous [N (%)]||29 (48.3)|
|Race [N (%)]|
|Mean pregnancy MEQ total score||2.9 |
|MEQ Awareness||2.6 |
|MEQ Distraction||3.1 |
|MEQ Disinhibition||3.2 |
|MEQ Emotional||3.3 |
|MEQ External||2.3 |
|Mean pregnancy DII||–0.01 |
|Total GWG (Kg)||9.9 |
|Rate of GWG (kg/week)||0.4 |
|Rate of fat mass gain (kg/week)||0.04 |
|Biomarkers in late gestation||Median (IQR)|
|Fasting glucose (mg/dL)||85.5 (13.25)|
|Fasting insulin (mU/mL)||17.1 (9.5)|
|Ghrelin (pg/mL)||364.0 (184.0)|
|BMI, body mass index; DII, dietary inflammatory index; GWG, gestational weight gain; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; IQR, interquartile range; MEQ, mindful eating questionnaire.|
The mindful eating total score was not associated with rate of weight or fat mass gain, adjusting for covariates (Table 2, Ref. ). The distracted eating subscale was significant, such that more distracted eating behavior was associated with greater total weight gain (B = –0.13, uncorrected p = 0.03) and the gain in fat mass (B = –2.07, uncorrected p = 0.02) (Table 3, Ref. ; Fig. 1). However, this association was not significant after FDR correction for multiple testing.
|Beta||Std. Error||95% CI||p-value||Adj R2||p-adj*|
|Rate of GWG|
|MEQ total (unadjusted)||–0.164||–0.119||–0.403||0.076||0.175|
|Rate of fat mass gain|
|MEQ total (unadjusted)||–0.099||0.084||–0.268||0.069||0.242|
|MEQ total (unadjusted)||–0.152||0.115||–0.382||0.079||0.193|
|MEQ total (unadjusted)||–0.141||0.056||–0.253||–0.029||0.015|
|BMI, body mass index; DII, dietary inflammatory index; DV, dependent variable; GWG, gestational weight gain; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; MEQ, mindful eating questionnaire. * Adjusted p-value using the false discovery rate method .|
|Beta||Std. Error||95% CI||p-value||Adj R2||p-adj*|
|Rate of GWG|
|Rate of fat mass gain|
|Models adjusted for DII, parity, pregravid BMI, maternal age, and race.|
DV, dependent variable; GWG, gestational weight gain; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; MEQ, mindful eating questionnaire.
* Adjusted p-value using the false discovery rate method .
Association of mindful eating with metabolic outcomes in pregnant women with obesity, identified by race category. Linear association of the mindful eating distraction subscale with (A) rate of gestational weight gain and (B) rate of fat mass gain, and linear association of the total mindful eating score with (C) insulin resistance and (D) fasting ghrelin concentration. Independent variables (x-axes) are adjusted for maternal age, early pregnancy BMI, parity, and race. Red markers represent participants of Black or African-American race and blue markers represent participants of non-Black or African-American race.
The total MEQ score was inversely associated with HOMA-IR, such that more mindful eating was associated with less insulin resistance (Table 2, Fig. 1). This association with the total MEQ score did not hold significance after FDR correction, and none of the MEQ subscales were associated with insulin resistance (Table 3). Given the observed associations between the MEQ and adiposity gain, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to additionally control for rate of GWG, as this variable may be on the causal pathway of developing insulin resistance in late pregnancy. This attenuated the association of the total MEQ score (B = –0.21, p = 0.13) and emotional eating score (B = –0.06, p = 0.08) with HOMA-IR.
The MEQ total score was not correlated with the DII (r = –0.1, p = 0.46) but lower awareness of the sensory aspects of eating subscale was associated with a more pro-inflammatory diet (r = –0.3, p = 0.02). When stratified by maternal race, the correlation between the awareness subscale and the DII was only evident among women of non-Black race (r = –0.57, p = 0.001; Fig. 2). Total MEQ scores were inversely associated with fasting ghrelin levels (Table 2, Fig. 1), driven by the external eating subscale (Table 3), such that less tendency to eat under the influence of external cues was associated with lower ghrelin (B = –0.13, uncorrected p = 0.003). These associations between between total MEQ and external eating subscale scores with ghrelin levels held a trend towards significance after FDR correction. In a sensitivity analysis, additional adjustment for rate of GWG attenuated the association with the total MEQ score (B = –0.11, p = 0.09), but not for the external eating subscale (B = –0.14, p = 0.002).
Association of mindful eating with the dietary inflammatory index in pregnant women with obesity, identified by race category. Linear association of the mindful eating awareness subscale with the dietary inflammatory index, stratified by race category. Red markers represent participants of Black or African-American race and blue markers represent participants of non-Black or African-American race. Fit lines represent the direction of association for each race category.
The DII was not associated with any of the outcome variables in regression
models (Table 2), nor did it moderate the effect of MEQ on any of the outcome
Mindful eating is a branch of mindfulness practice that is accessible to all individuals and aims to bring awareness and attention to the process of eating, while minimizing any distractions or thought processes unrelated to eating. In this way, mindful eating promotes healthy eating behaviors that may be conducive to weight management and improved metabolic health [36, 37]. Although the results of this study become non-significant after correction for multiple testing, the unadjusted results provide initial insight to the potential for aspects of mindful eating to beneficially influence the metabolic milieu in pregnant women with obesity. This exploratory analysis adds to a sparse literature on the relationship between mindful eating and metabolic health outcomes. Thus, the discussion focuses on the results from the unadjusted analysis in order to provide a basis for future research to test investigate whether mindful eating during pregnancy may exert positive metabolic health effects.
Mindfulness during eating was modestly associated with less insulin resistance and lower ghrelin levels measured cross-sectionally in late gestation, while less distraction during eating was associated with a lower rate of gain in weight and fat mass. The effects of mindful eating on insulin resistance appeared to be driven by the attenuated adiposity gain, while the effects on ghrelin concentrations were somewhat independent of this effect. Interestingly, the DII was not associated with any outcome measure, nor did it moderate the associations between mindful eating and the metabolic outcomes.
The underlying mechanisms that link mindful eating behaviors to improved metabolic health outcomes are potentially related to appetite regulation and biological stress pathways. Ghrelin is an appetite-stimulating hormone produced in the stomach and higher circulating concentrations are associated with hedonic eating and preference for sweet foods [38, 39]. More mindfulness during eating was associated with lower hunger signals measured from fasting samples, and this appeared to be driven by the external eating subscale. These findings suggest that a lower susceptibility to external food cues, such as food marketing, may contribute to decreased appetite in pregnant women with obesity. The potential to elicit appetite-regulation via decreased plasma ghrelin in response to a prenatal mindful eating intervention remains to be determined.
It is also possible that mindfulness around eating either promotes, or is a response to, improved psychological states (e.g., low stress, positive affect), which is generally associated with lower circulating levels of the stress hormone cortisol. As a catabolic hormone, cortisol promotes elevated blood glucose to fuel the stress response through increased glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis, and reduced postprandial glucose clearance [40, 41, 42]. Thus, psychological distress may contribute to insulin resistance over time, regardless of diet quality. This has been demonstrated in a prenatal study that investigated the interactive effects of negative mood state and diet quality on levels of HOMA-IR in the third trimester, and found that heightened negative mood overshadowed any beneficial effects of a healthy Mediterranean dietary pattern on insulin resistance . Lower maternal stress levels may also contribute to lower plasma ghrelin among those with higher mindful eating scores, as this hormone has been found to increase under repeated or chronic stress , possibly in direct response to elevated cortisol levels . In this way, ghrelin may increase motivation to eat under stress, a pattern that is commonly observed in individuals with overweight and obesity , and may contribute to poor metabolic outcomes in pregnant women . Although maternal stress was not assessed in our study, we propose this to be a probable factor mediating the association between mindful eating, weight and adiposity gain, hunger levels, and insulin resistance.
In our cohort of 46 pregnant women with obesity ranging from 30.2 to 57.1
There is limited literature to date reporting associations of mindfulness in pregnancy on GWG and metabolic markers. Epel et al.  conducted a randomized controlled trial of a prenatal mindfulness intervention, which incorporated mindful eating, among low-income women with overweight and obesity. They reported no beneficial effect on absolute GWG, although a higher proportion of women in the intervention group gained weight below the recommendations for their pre-pregnancy BMI category. Furthermore, in a subset of women (n = 141/209) with available data from a 1-hour glucose challenge test, the intervention was associated with a lower incidence of impaired glucose tolerance compared to control . Our findings with respect to lower rate of GWG and less insulin resistance with less distracted eating behavior, contributes to this sparse literature regarding the potential beneficial effects of prenatal mindfulness training for metabolic health outcomes among women at heightened risk of glucose intolerance.
Our results are also supported by evidence from the non-pregnancy literature. In the context of diabetes, a randomized clinical trial that compared the effects of a 3-month mindful eating intervention to a traditional self-management program (nutrition counseling, exercise, self-monitoring blood glucose) found that both interventions exerted comparable and significant improvements to glycemic control measured by hemoglobin A1c . This indicates that mindful eating may be an equally effective approach to traditional methods for diabetes management. Conclusions from a recent meta-analysis and integrative review support the efficacy of mindful eating interventions for weight loss among non-pregnant individuals with overweight and obesity, demonstrating them to be at least comparable to , if not modestly more effective than , conventional diet and exercise approaches. However, to our knowledge, no prenatal intervention study has specifically examined the effects of mindful eating alone on GWG or associated metabolic outcomes. This is an important question to investigate as it is possible that pregnant women are more receptive to the compassionate approach promoted by mindful eating techniques, as opposed to prescribed dietary and exercise regimens that do not necessarily address the underlying psychological states that drive eating behavior.
Although the MEQ total score was not associated with weight and adiposity gain across gestation in our study, the distracted eating subscale emerged as a factor related to these outcomes. Items in the MEQ that contribute to the distracted eating subscale include “I eat so quickly that I don’t notice what I am eating” and “I think about things I need to do while I am eating”. In a meta-analysis of studies in non-pregnant individuals that manipulated awareness, memory and attentiveness while eating, distracted eating was found to be the strongest determinant for quantity of food consumed in both the immediate term and later in the day . Thus, future prenatal interventions that focus on mindful eating and emphasize attentiveness while eating are warranted to determine the effects on adiposity gain and biological markers of metabolic health.
Strengths of this study include the focus on maternal obesity from a diverse prenatal cohort; detailed characterization of maternal metabolic milieu using biomarkers and direct measurement of adiposity, as well as GWG; and characterization of dietary composition and eating behaviors using indices that have not yet been studied in a prenatal cohort exclusively with obesity. Study limitations include the small sample size which limited our ability to further interrogate differential effects by race/ethnicity, and may be underpowered to detect significant effects of MEQ on metabolic outcomes. The observational study design also precludes the ability to determine causation for the observed associations. As women with psychological or eating disorders were excluded from the study, the results may not be generalizable to such patient populations.
In conclusion, this study suggests mindful eating as a potential tool to improve metabolic health outcomes in pregnant women with obesity, although larger studies with adequate power are required to determine if these associations can be replicated. The potential mechanisms underlying these outcomes include improved recognition of hunger and satiety signals that may moderate total energy intake, and reduced biological stress signals that can influence glucose metabolism and energy storage as well as food cravings. Future prenatal lifestyle interventions should incorporate or focus on mindfulness during eating to determine the efficacy of this approach for reducing the risk of adverse maternal and offspring health outcomes associated with pregravid maternal obesity.
LMR conceived the experiments and designed the study. JM and ADA carried out experiments. KLL, JM, KB, MK and LMR analyzed data. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted manuscript.
Data were obtained with the informed consent of all participants. The institutional review board of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center approved the study, code 13020. Deidentified data sharing and analysis was approved by the institutional review board of the University of California, Irvine. Trial registered at Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01954342.
We thank the participants for contributing their data to this study.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, grant numbers R01 DK099175, P30 DK072476, U54 GM104940 (Redman) and R00HD096109 (Lindsay). The investigators (LR, MK, AA) are partially supported by R01 NR017644, R01 DK124806 and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship (RN439810; Kebbe).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data were obtained with the informed consent of all participants. The institutional review board of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center approved the study. Deidentified data sharing and analysis was approved by the institutional review board of the University of California, Irvine.
BMI, body mass index; DII, dietary inflammatory index; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; GWG, gestational weight gain; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; MEQ, mindful eating questionaire