IMR Press / EJGO / Volume 23 / Issue 4 / pii/2002169

European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology (EJGO) is published by IMR Press from Volume 40 Issue 1 (2019). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Original Research

Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study

Show Less
1 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Biochemistry, Baby Friendly Hospital, Kladno (Czech Republic)
2 Department of Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital Na Homolce, Prague (Czech Republic)
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, County Hospital, Vyskov (Czech Republic)
Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 2002, 23(4), 305–310;
Published: 10 August 2002

Purpose of investigation: Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer was traditionally done by laparotomy, however the laparo­scopic approach has gained wider acceptance by gynecologic surgeons. The primary aim of the study was to report the periopera­tive and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in a major group of patients with endometrial cancer. The second aim was to study the long-term results of laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Material and method: A prospective multicentric study was conducted at three oncolaparoscopic centres; 221 women who had undergone laparoscopic (177 women) or abdominal (44 women) hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lympha­denectomy were included in the study. Women with stage IA, grade 1 did not undergo lymphadenectomy unless they had a high risk histologic tumor type. Lymph node dissection was performed in 145 women with disease greater than IA or grades other than 1. Results: The mean age and weight were similar in the compared laparoscopic and open groups. Perioperative blood loss was com­parable in both groups (211.2 ml vs 245.7 ml, respectively) without any significant consecutive changes in serum hemoglobin values. Although the length of operating time for the laparoscopic surgery was significantly longer than the time for the laparotomy procedure (163.3 min vs 114.7 min, p < 0.0001), the laparoscopic patients were discharged from hospital much earlier at 3.9 days (range 2-16) after the laparoscopic procedure compared with 7.3 days (range 5-16) after the abdominal procedure (p < 0.0001). The difference in surgical complications between groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.58). Similar long-term results were noted in both groups. With a median follow-up of 33.6 months for the laparoscopy group and 45.2 months for the open group, there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence (p = 0.99] or recurrence-free survival (p = 0.86) between the two groups. Conclusion: The study illustrates that laparoscopically assisted surgical staging of endometrial cancer is safe as an open proce­dure. The laparoscopic approach may also be considered for endometrial malignancy which typically occurs in obese and elderly, high-risk women. Our analysis showed no difference with respect to recurrence or survival between the compared laparoscopic and the open group.

Endometrial carcinoma
Back to top