IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 49 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog4901004
Open Access Original Research
Analyzing the detrimental effects of female chronic hepatitis B virus DNA on ovarian reserve function and results of in vitro fertilization
Liu Liu1Hua Liang1Jing Yang2,*,†Fujin Shen1,*,†Wei Li1
Show Less
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, 430074 Wuhan, Hubei, China
2 Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, 430074 Wuhan, Hubei, China
*Correspondence: dryangqing@hotmail.com (Jing Yang); shenfj_rmh@outlook.com (Fujin Shen)
These authors contributed equally.
Academic Editor: Michael H. Dahan
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022 , 49(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4901004
Submitted: 26 December 2020 | Revised: 11 February 2021 | Accepted: 24 February 2021 | Published: 7 January 2022
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate both the impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA copies in women with HBV infection on the ovarian reserve function and outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on a total of 9927 couples undergoing their first IVF cycle. After filtering, 1570 couples (546 HBV-seropositive women and 1024 HBV-seronegative women whose partners were HBV-seronegative) failed to meet inclusion criteria. According to the HBV-DNA titers in serum, the HBV-seropositive group was divided into three groups: DNA-high copy group (n = 139), DNA-low copy group (n = 241), and DNA-negative group (n = 166). All patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using the long downregulation protocol followed by IVF. Results: Compared with the HBV-negative group, HBV-positive women with high DNA copy exhibited lower antral follicle count (AFC) (11.9 ± 4.3 vs 13.3 ± 3.2), lower number of oocyte retrieved (9.2 ± 5.7 vs 13.1 ± 6.1), larger proportion of AFC <8 (7.9% vs 3.1%) and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) <2 μg/L (8.6% vs 4.3%). Both high-DNA copy and low-DNA copy groups exhibited a lower fertilization rate (70.9% and 72.5% vs 75.1%), lower high-grade embryo rate (51.5% and 53.8% vs 56.9%), lower implantation rate (31.3% and 32.7% vs 38.5%), lower clinical pregnancy rate (40.3% and 42.3% vs 49.6% per cycle with OR; 45.5% and 48.8% vs 56.8% per cycle with ET) than the HBV-negative group. Moreover, a higher early abortion rate (19.6% and 15.7% vs 7.1%) was observed in the above two groups. Conclusion: HBV-DNA may have a negative effect on women’s ovarian reserve function which in turn results in poor fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate and high early abortion rate in IVF treatment.

Keywords
HBV-DNA
Female infertility
Ovarian function
In vitro fertilization
1. Introduction

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, which can cause hepatic inflammation and severe diseases such as hepatocirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, is a worldwide public health concern [1]. It is estimated that a global prevalence of 3.5% [2], i.e., 2.57 billion people worldwide have been infected with HBV and that roughly 270 million people have been chronically infected, of whom women of reproductive age account for 25.3% [3]. China accounts for some of the highest prevalence of HBV around the world [4, 5]. The main source of transmission for HBV is via familial vertical transmission, including cases of both mother- and father-to-infant vertical transmission, the former being dominant [6, 7, 8]. Newborns from HBsAg positive pregnant women who begin passive-active immunization immediately after birth can significantly reduce vertical transmission, but still have 5%–10% infection with HBV [9, 10].

Hepatitis B virus is a double-stranded DNA virus of the Hepadnaviridae family. Serum HBV-DNA content is the most direct and reliable indicator of viral activity in HBV-infected patients [11, 12]. Apart from hepatocytes, HBV-DNA is also found and expressed in reproductive gonads, such as testis, sperm, seminal plasma, granulosa cells, and oocytes [13]. One study reported that HBV-DNA high-level mothers are more susceptible to mother-to-child transmission [14]. Furthermore, HBV can infect spermatozoa, which in turn affects its quality and function [15]. Recently, as an increasing number of HBV seropositive infertile couples have chosen ART, certain challenges have emerged: could chronic HBV infection affect the ovarian reserve function, egg quality, embryonic development, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET)?

Given that the cases in our medical center have been routinely and systematically screened for both partners for repertoire virus prior to IVF treatment, we undertook a retrospective study to evaluate the impact of HBV-DNA on ovarian function, ovarian stimulation and outcome of IVF for women with or without infection by HBsAg.

2. Materials and methods
2.1 Patients

This study included 9927 infertile couples (20–43 years of age) seeking IVF treatment for the first cycle from October 2014 to August 2019 in the Reproductive Medical Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. All couples were tested for repertoire viruses such as HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis within 1 year of the ART cycle during routine HBV-DNA inspection in patients with Serum HBsAg positive. HBV-seropositive patients with DNA titers >1 × 106 IU/mL were suggested antiviral treatment before ART. Couples who were seropositive for HCV, HIV, syphilis or those who were diagnosed with acute hepatitis, obvious liver dysfunction or who had received any antiviral therapy before cycles were excluded from the study. We further excluded couples with chromosomal abnormalities, women with a history of endometriosis, ovarian surgery, and whose partners had been diagnosed with asthenospermia and azoospermia. Additionally, HBV-seropositive male partners were screened out. All male partners had semen analysis conducted after 3–7 days of sexual abstinence. Semen parameters were analyzed according to WHO guidelines (5th edition) [16].

Based on the above inclusion and exclusion criteria, we excluded 8357 infertile couples and screened out 1570 infertile couples for investigation, among whom, all male partners were HBV-seronegative. According to the criterion whereby HBsAg is positive or not and the HBV-DNA titers in serum of female partners, the patients were divided into four groups, HBV-DNA-high copy group (n = 139): serum HBsAg (+), HBV-DNA >1 × 105 IU/mL; HBV-DNA-low copy group (n = 241): serum HBsAg (+), 500 IU/mL <HBV-DNA <1 × 105 IU/mL; HBV-DNA-negative group (n = 166): serum HBsAg (+), HBV-DNA <500 IU/mL; and HBV-negative group (n = 1024): serum HBsAg(-). The male partners for all groups were seronegative for HBsAg.

2.2 The ART treatment protocol

All patients underwent IVF treatment with routine pituitary suppression protocol, as previously described [17]. In brief, patients were subcutaneously injected with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; Decapeptyl or Diphereline; Ispen, Paris, France) in the mid-luteal phase for at least 14 days. Once the pituitary activity was completely suppressed, the process of ovarian stimulation was commenced with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG; LIVZON Group, Guangzhou, China) or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-f; Merck Serono, Geneva, Switzerland or Puregon; Schering-Plough; Kenilworth, NJ, USA). Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG; LIVZON Group, Guangzhou, China) was injected when at least three follicles had an average diameter of 18 mm. Then, the oocytes were retrieved after HCG had been injected for 34–36 hours. In the following 16 to 20 hours, IVF was conducted, followed by embryo selection and ET after being cultured in vitro. If there were no available embryos or in the event that patients developed OHSS or showed a risk of OHSS, cycles were canceled.

2.3 IVF outcome measures

Basic data of patients included: age and BMI of couples; sperm parameters; duration and cause of infertility; ovarian reserve evaluation (levels of serum anti-mullerian hormone, menstrual cycle day 3 levels of serum FSH, LH, E2 and antral follicle count). We also collected data concerning COH and embryology: duration and total dose of gonadotropin (Gn) applied; serum estradiol (E2) lever and endometrial thickness on the day of HCG injection; the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos transferred; cycles with rescue ICSI performed; cycles without ET for no viable embryos; cycles without ET for the danger of OHSS; fertilization rate; high-grade embryo rate; implantation rate; pregnancy rate; early abortion rate.

Fertilization rate was defined as the number of confirmed zygotes per the number of oocytes retrieved in the IVF cycle. High-grade embryo rate was defined as the number of embryos having 6 cells with a type of A or B per number of divisive embryos on day 3 of culture. Implantation rate was represented by the number of intrauterine or extrauterine gestational sacs checked by vaginal ultrasound examination 30 days after embryo transfer per embryo transferred. Clinical pregnancy rate was defined as the number of women who had intrauterine gestational sacs per cycle with oocyte retrieval or embryo transfer. Early abortion rate was defined as the number of cycles of abortion per number of cycles of all clinical pregnancies within 12 weeks.

2.4 Statistical analyses

Data were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and percentage for categorical data. All statistical analyses were conducted using the commercial software Statistical Package for Social Science, v.22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables and categorical data between two groups were analyzed statistically by independent sample t-test and Chi-squared test, respectively. All p values quoted were two-sided, and p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

At the outset of this study, we analyzed a total of 9,927 couples (20–43 years of age) who underwent their first IVF cycle in our medical center from October 2014 to August 2019, among whom 596 (6.0%) were HBsAg positive, with the prevalence of HBsAg of each year shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Prevalence of women positive for HBsAg from 2014 to 2019 in our medical center.

Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, we excluded 8357 infertile couples and screened out 1570 infertile couples, among whom 546 women were HBsAg positive with 139 women categorized as high DNA copy and 241 women as low DNA copy. The demographic data of the subjects are shown in Table 1. Regarding the indexes of age, BMI of couples, the duration and cause of infertility, and the basal semen parameters, there were no significant differences between the HBV-positive and HBV-negative groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) among the three HBV-positive groups for these indexes.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of HBV-positive and HBV-negative groups.
Characteristics HBV-positive groups HBV-negative group
DNA-high copy DNA-low copy DNA-negative (n = 1024)
(n = 139) (n = 241) (n = 166)
Female age (years) 31.2 ± 4.0 31.2 ± 4.6 31.3 ± 3.1 30.9 ± 4.2
Male age (years) 35.1 ± 5.5 35.0 ± 4.0 34.8 ± 4.7 34.2 ± 4.8
Female BMI (kg/m2) 21.9 ± 2.8 21.9 ± 2.3 21.8 ± 2.7 21.8 ± 3.0
Male BMI (kg/m2) 23.3 ± 3.2 23.6 ± 3.4 23.4 ± 3.1 23.3 ± 3.3
Duration of infertility (years) 4.5 ± 3.6 4.4 ± 2.5 4.3 ± 2.8 4.20 ± 3.2
Cause of infertility
Tubal blockage 114 (82.0%) 192 (79.7%) 134 (80.7%) 811 (79.2%)
Male factor 40 (28.8%) 73 (30.3%) 47 (28.3%) 267 (26.1%)
Others 6 (4.3%) 12 (5.0%) 8 (4.8%) 41 (4.0%)
Basal semen parameters
Volume (mL) 1.89 ± 0.7 1.81 ± 0.5 1.83 ± 0.4 1.85 ± 0.6
Concentration (× 106/mL) 76.24 ± 47.2 75.24 ± 45.1 76.01 ± 47.6 75.35 ± 46.9
Progressive motility (a + b) (%) 30.4 ± 18.8 30.9 ± 16.8 30.7 ± 18.2 29.98 ± 17.6
Normal morphology (%) 14.58 ± 4.9 14.31 ± 4.5 13.9 ± 5.2 14.01 ± 5.5
Note: Values are presented as mean ± SD or numbers (percentages) of participants.

The data on ovarian reserve function are shown in Table 2. The AFC refers to follicles with a diameter of 2–9 mm visible in the ovary under vaginal ultrasound. It can reflect the number of original follicles remaining in the follicle pool well and is a direct reflection of ovarian reserve function [25, 26]. AFC <8 is most accurate for predicting low ovarian response [27]. The number of AFC is significantly smaller in the DNA-high copy group than in the HBV-negative group (11.9 ± 4.3 vs 13.3 ± 3.2; p = 0.037). Moreover, the proportion of AFC <8 and AMH <2 μg/L is significantly larger in the DNA-high copy group (7.9% vs 3.1%; p = 0.01; 8.6% vs 4.3%; p = 0.042). There were no significant differences between the HBV-positive and HBV-negative groups (p > 0.05) for the Day 3 serum FSH, E2, and LH level of menstrual cycles, the proportion of FSH >10 and FSH/LH >3. Nor were there significant differences (p > 0.05) among the three HBV-positive groups.

Table 2.The data on ovarian reserve function of HBV-positive and HBV-negative groups.
Characteristics HBV-positive groups HBV-negative group
DNA-high copy DNA-low copy DNA-negative (n = 1024)
(n = 139) (n = 241) (n = 166)
FSH level (IU/L) 7.6 ± 1.7 7.4 ± 1.8 7.1 ± 2.0 7.3 ± 2.2
LH level (IU/L) 4.7 ± 2.1 4.7 ± 2.9 4.6 ± 2.2 5.0 ± 3.6
E2 level (IU/L) 48.9 ± 15.4 49.4 ± 18.1 48.5 ± 16.8 45.6 ± 14.2
No. of AFC 11.9 ± 4.3* 12.8 ± 5.5 13.1 ± 4.6 13.3 ± 3.2
FSH >10 mIU/mL 8 (5.8%) 13 (5.3%) 8 (4.8%) 53 (5.2%)
FSH/LH >3 16 (11.5%) 25 (10.4%) 16 (9.7%) 123 (12.0%)
AFC <8 11 (7.9%)** 12 (5.0%) 6 (3.6%) 32 (3.1%)
AMH <2 μg/L 12 (8.6%)* 17 (7.1%) 9 (5.4%) 44 (4.3%)
Note: Values are presented as mean ± SD or numbers (percentages) of participants.
*p < 0.05, versus HBV-negative group (Mann-Whitney U-test or Chi-squared test).
**p < 0.01, versus HBV-negative group (Chi-squared test).

The data on COH and embryology are summarized in Table 3. We found that fewer oocytes were retrieved in the DNA-high copy group than in the HBV-seronegative group (9.2 ± 5.7 vs 13.1 ± 6.1; p = 0.041). Compared with the HBV-seronegative group, both DNA-high copy and DNA-low copy groups showed that more individuals cancelled ET for no available embryos (4.3% vs 1.4%; p = 0.031 and 3.7% vs 1.4%; p = 0.027), lower fertilization rate (70.9% vs 75.1%; p = 0.003 and 72.5% vs 75.1%; p = 0.013) and lower high-grade embryo rate (51.5% vs 56.9%; p = 0.005 and 53.8% vs 56.9%; p = 0.029).

Table 3.The data on COH and embryology of HBV-positive and HBV-negative groups.
Characteristics HBV-positive groups HBV-negative group
DNA-high copy DNA-low copy DNA-negative (n = 1024)
(n = 139) (n = 241) (n = 166)
Duration of Gn stimulation (d) 11.0 ± 1.3 10.9 ± 1.9 11.1 ± 1.5 10.5 ± 1.0
Total dose of Gn used (IU) 2287.9 ± 730.2 2295.38 ± 642.5 2310.36 ± 814.2 2340.48 ± 763.1
Endometrial thickness (mm) on the day of HCG injection 1.1 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.9 1.0 ± 0.2
E2 level (pg/mL) on the day of HCG injection 4512.6 ± 2116.4 4463.54 ± 3320.7 4481.02 ± 3926.4 4532.23 ± 4518.9
No. of oocytes retrieved 9.2 ± 5.7* 12.6 ± 5.1 13.0 ± 6.4 13.1 ± 6.1
No. of embryos transferred in cycles by ET 2.03 ± 0.25 2.05 ± 0.41 2.01 ± 0.35 2.07 ± 0.3
Cycles with rescue ICSI performed 11 (7.9%) 11 (7.1%) 11 (6.6%) 72 (7.0%)
Fertilization rate 771/1087 (70.9%)** 1571/2168 (72.5%)* 1065/1432 (74.4%) 5997/7985 (75.1%)
High-grade embryo rate 385/748 (51.5%)** 825/1534 (53.8%)* 579/1042 (55.6%) 3364/5913 (56.9%)
Cycles without ET for no viable embryos 6 (4.3%)* 9 (3.7%)* 4 (2.4%) 14 (1.4%)
Cycles without ET for danger of OHSS 13 (8.6%) 21 (8.7%) 14 (8.4%) 87 (8.5%)
Implantation rate 67/214 (31.3%)* 131/401 (32.7%)* 107/283 (37.8%) 750/1948 (38.5%)
Clinical pregnancy rate/cycle with OR 56/139 (40.3%)* 102/241 (42.3%)* 80/166 (48.2%) 508/1024 (49.6%)
Clinical pregnancy rate/cycle with ET 56/123 (45.5%)** 102/209 (48.8%)* 80/148 (54.1%) 508/894 (56.8%)
Early abortion rate 11/56 (19.6%)** 16/102 (15.7%)** 8/80 (10.0%) 36/508 (7.1%)
Note: Values are presented as mean ± SD or numbers (percentages) of participants.
*p < 0.05, versus HBV-negative group (Mann-Whitney U-test or Chi-squared test).
**p < 0.01, versus HBV-negative group (Chi-squared test).

The duration of Gn stimulation, total dose of Gn used, endometrial thickness on the day of HCG injection, No. of embryos transferred per ET cycle, cycles with rescue ICSI performed as well as the cycles without ET for the danger of OHSS were not significantly different among the HBV-seropositive and seropositive groups (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences (p > 0.05) among the three HBV-positive groups.

Furthermore, compared with the HBV-negative group, the implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly lower in both DNA-high copy and DNA-low copy groups (implantation rate: 31.3% vs 38.5%, p = 0.039 and 32.7% vs 38.5%, p = 0.028; clinical rate: 40.3% vs 49.6%, p = 0.039 and 42.3% vs 49.6%, p = 0.042 per cycle with OR and 45.5% vs 56.8%, p = 0.018 and 48.8% vs 56.8%, p = 0.036 per cycle with ET), and the early abortion rate was significantly higher in both DNA-high copy and DNA-low copy groups (19.6% vs 7.1%; p = 0.001 and 15.7% vs 7.1%; p = 0.005).

4. Discussion

China is a highly endemic area for HBV, with an overall prevalence of 5.2% among women of reproductive age [18]. However, the prevalence in this study was slightly higher at 5.4–6.7%, possibly on account of geographical variation. The number of seropositive infertile women in our medical center has gradually risen over the past six years, as shown in Fig. 1. Recently, laboratory tests for hepatitis B cases and clinical diagnosis have become increasingly standardized, thereby reducing the rate of missed reports. With improvements in economic conditions, more infertile women, especially in the surrounding countryside which is often at a heightened risk of hepatitis B, have embraced ART. This may further explain the higher prevalence during the study period.

In this study, 546 infertile patients infected with HBV were collected; the positive rate of HBV-DNA was 69.60% out of the total 1570 cases, among which the low copy of HBV-DNA was the majority (44.14%). This suggests that the viral replication in HBV-infected women of childbearing age is predominantly associated with low replication, that adults have a certain capacity of immune clearance of HBV, while a significant proportion of women are still highly active (DNA-high copy group: 25.46%).

Among several studies [19, 20, 21, 22, 23] that have addressed the reproductive performance of couples infected with HBV, results are discordant. Some studies [19, 20] showed significantly lower implantation in couples conflicting for HBV infection, while others reported a higher implantation rate in couples of HBV infection than the control individuals [23]. However, none of them took into account the state of HBV-DNA copies. Our study was grouped on the copy amount of HBV-DNA, designed to evaluate the varying degrees of copy amount of HBV-DNA infection on ovarian function, ovarian stimulation and outcome of IVF for women.

In HBV-infected patients, serum HBV-DNA assay is the most direct and reliable indicator of viral activity, particularly useful in assessing the risk of disease progression and candidacy for antiviral therapy and to distinguish active hepatitis B from the inactive carrier state [24]. We found that compared with the HBV-negative group, among HBV-infected infertile women, high copy status of HBV-DNA generated fewer AFCs, a lower number of retrieved oocytes, larger proportion of AFC <8 and proportion of AMH <2 μg/L, which increases the risk of ovarian reserve dysfunction.

In women, AMH is secreted by pre-sinus follicles and small sinusoidal follicle granule cells. Compared with other existing hormone tests, AMH fluctuates slightly during the menstrual cycle and is less susceptible to gonadotropins [28]. Therefore, AMH is a sensitive and accurate indicator of ovarian reserve function [29]. AMH <2 mg/L indicates that ovarian reserve function has begun to decline [30]. AMH combined with AFC can be used as a reliable indicator for predicting ovarian reserve function [31].

Several studies have provided evidence of HBV infection in the ovaries and even in oocytes [32]. Moreover, HBV-DNA positive rates in oocytes and embryos are positively correlated with serum HBV-DNA levels [33, 34]. Studies have also shown that HBV carrying can cause local immune or inflammatory reactions in the destruction of related functions in local tissues through the deposition of antigen-antibody complexes [35, 36, 37]. HBV infection can increase the proportion of sperm cell necrosis and apoptosis, destroy the integrity of the sperm membrane, cause the loss of sperm mitochondrial membrane, and reduce the function of sperm [20]. Therefore, HBV-DNA may damage ovarian tissue and oocytes, cause changes in ovarian reserve functions such as AMH and AFC, and affect the quality of eggs and embryos. Accordingly, we postulate that when a large amount of HBV-DNA is present in the blood, it can have negative effect on ovarian reserve function.

In this study, we observed a lower fertilization rate, lower high-grade embryo rate and more cycles without ET for no available embryos in both infertile women with high and low copies of HBV-DNA. Fertilization is the process of the egg and sperm fusing into a zygote. HBV-DNA sequences may pass through the zona and oolemma and integrate with oocyte genome, and then replicate and exist in the ovum at different stages [38, 39, 40, 41]. It may be an important mechanism for HBV vertical transmission that when oocytes are fertilized with normal spermatozoa, these sperm transmit HBV-DNA sequences to the embryo [39]. We speculate that when oocyte quality is thus damaged, the process of fertilization is affected in women with both high and low copies of HBV-DNA.

We observed lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in both DNA-high and DNA-low groups along with a higher early abortion rate in the above-mentioned two groups. This is consistent with the observations by Cui et al. [42] who showed that among 21,004 pregnant women in a prospective cohort study, the proportion of abortions in HBsAg carriers was significantly higher than in the control. Embryo is transferred in the last step of the IVF cycle and will subsequently develop into a new individual. The success rate is associated with endometrial receptivity as well as the quality of embryo. A separate study reported that integration and replication of HBV genes can cause chromosomal mutations in early embryonic cells while viral protein products can interfere with embryo metabolism and development [43]. As previously described, HBV-DNA can be detected in the female reproductive tract system and might have an impact on the embryo tissue and endometrial local immunity, and for HBV-seropositive women with impaired oocyte binding, these may be responsible (at least in part) for poor pregnancy results. In addition, we did not find differences among three HBV-positive groups, potentially attributable to insufficient sample sizes. As the sample size and research indicators of this study are still limited, large sample clinical research and related basic research are necessary to further confirm the specific underlying mechanism of this research.

5. Conclusions

Our study shows that HBV-DNA in HBV-seropositive women may interfere with ovarian reserve function and ultimately affect pregnancy outcome. For women of childbearing age with HBV infection, especially with high copy status of HBV-DNA, it is recommended that treatment and childbearing occur as early as possible in order to reduce the impact of HBV infection on ovarian reserve function. Prior to assisted pregnancy treatment, this population should be fully informed about possible outcomes to avoid medical risks. With enhanced prediction of ovarian reserve function, embryo quality, fertilization rate and pregnancy rate, improved consultation can be provided to HBV-seropositive infertile women.

Abbreviations

AFC, antral follicle count; AMH, anti-mullerian hormone; ART, assisted reproductive technology; BMI, body mass index; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; E2, estradiol; ET, embryo transfer; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; Gn, gonadotropin; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICSI, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization; LH, luteinizing hormone; OHSS, ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome; OR, oocyte retrieval.

Author contributions

LL and HL wrote the paper and analyzed the data; FS and JY proposed the idea and help revise the manuscript; WL collected the data and provided some suggestion for drafting the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The institutional review board of the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University approved the ethics of this research (20190522002). Informed consent was obtained from all patients before data collection.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank all peer reviewers for their opinions and suggestions.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Likhitsup A, Lok AS. Understanding the natural history of hepatitis B virus infection and the new definitions of cure and the endpoints of clinical trials. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2019; 23: 401–416.
[2]
Cheung KW, Lao TT-H. Hepatitis B–vertical transmission and the prevention of mother-to-child transmission. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020; 68: 78–88.
[3]
World Health Organization. Global hepatitis report 2017. World Health Organization. 2017. Available at: https://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/en/ (Accessed: 21 April 2017)
[4]
Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386: 1546–1555.
[5]
Yang R, Gui X, Ke H, Xiong Y, Gao S. Long‐term observation on hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in therapy experienced HIV/HBV co‐infected Chinese. Journal of Viral Hepatitis. 2020; 27: 127–134.
[6]
Seto WK, Lo YR, Pawlotsky JM, Yuen MF. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection. The Lancet. 2018; 392: 2313–2324.
[7]
Indolfi G, Easterbrook P, Dusheiko G, Siberry G, Chang M-H, Thorne C, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection in children and adolescents. Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2019; 4: 466–476.
[8]
Yin X, Han G, Zhang H, Wang M, Hou J. A real-world prospective study of mother-to-child transmission of HBV in China using a mobile health application (Shield 01). Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology. 2020; 8: 1–8.
[9]
Kang W, Li Q, Shen L, Zhang L, Tian Z, Xu L, et al. Risk factors related to the failure of prevention of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission in Yunnan, China. Vaccine. 2017; 35: 605–609.
[10]
Machaira M, Papaevangelou V, Vouloumanou EK, Tansarli GS, Falagas ME. Hepatitis B vaccine alone or with hepatitis B immunoglobulin in neonates of HBsAg+/HBeAg− mothers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2015; 70: 396–404.
[11]
Chu CJ, Hussain M, Lok AS. Quantitative serum HBV-DNA levels during different stages of chronic hepatitis B infection. Hepatology. 2002; 36: 1408–1415.
[12]
Huang H, Wang J, Li W, Chen R, Lu F. Serum HBV-DNA plus RNA shows superiority in reflecting the activity of intrahepatic cccDNA in treatment-naïve HBV-infected individuals. Journal of Clinical Virology the Official Publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. 2018; 99–100: 71–78.
[13]
Qian WP, Tan YQ, Chen Y, Peng Y, Li Z, Lu GX, et al. Rapid quantification of semen hepatitis B virus DNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2005; 11: 5385–5389
[14]
Lu Y, Zhu FC, Liu JX, Zhai XJ, Chang ZJ, Yan L, et al. The maternal viral threshold for antiviral prophylaxis of perinatal hepatitis B virus transmission in settings with limited resources: a large prospective cohort study in China. Vaccine. 2017; 35: 6627–6633.
[15]
Zhou XP, Hu XL, Zhu YM, Qu F, Sun SJ, Qian YL. Comparison of semen quality and outcome of assisted reproductive techniques in Chinese men with and without hepatitis B. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2011; 13: 465–469.
[16]
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 2010. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547789 (Accessed: 31 Janurary 2010).
[17]
Zhao Q, Yin T, Peng J, Zou Y, Yang J, Shen A, et al. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of human embryo culture media using a simple spectroscopy adjunct to morphology for embryo assessment in in vitro fertilization (IVF). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013; 14: 6556–6570.
[18]
Wang Y, Zhou H, Zhang L, Zhong Q, Wang Q, Shen H, et al. Prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and status of HBV care among rural women who planned to conceive in China. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 1–7.
[19]
Pirwany IR, Phillips S, Kelly S, Buckett W, Tan SL. Reproductive performance of couples discordant for hepatitis B and C following IVF treatment. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2004; 21: 157–161.
[20]
Shi L, Liu S, Zhao W, Zhou H, Ren W, Shi J. Hepatitis B virus infection reduces fertilization ability during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Journal of Medical Virology. 2014; 86: 1099–1104.
[21]
Chen H, Ge H-S, Lv J-Q, Wu X-M, Xi H-T, Huang J-Y, et al. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection in women is not associated with IVF/ICSI outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014; 289: 213–217.
[22]
Lubis H, Halim B, Adenin I, Rusda M, Prasetiawan E. Hepatitis B virus infection on male partner has negative impact on in-vitro fertilization. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Bristol: IOP Publishing. 2018.
[23]
Lam PM, Suen SH, Lao TT, Cheung LP, Leung TY, Haines C. Hepatitis B infection and outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment. Fertility and Sterility. 2010; 93: 480–485.
[24]
Terrault NA, Lok AS, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018; 67: 1560–1599.
[25]
Zhang Y, Xu Y, Xue Q, Shang J, Yang X, Shan X, et al. Discordance between antral follicle counts and anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2019; 17: 51.
[26]
Maldonado-Cárceles AB, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Souter I, Gaskins AJ, Chavarro JE. Dietary patterns and ovarian reserve among women attending a fertility clinic. Fertility and Sterility. 2020; 114: 610–617.
[27]
Polyzos NP, Tournaye H, Guzman L, Camus M, Nelson SM. Predictors of ovarian response in women treated with corifollitropin alfa for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility. 2013; 100: 430–437.
[28]
Gracia CR, Shin SS, Prewitt M, Chamberlin JS, Broyles DL. Multi-center clinical evaluation of the Access AMH assay to determine AMH levels in reproductive age women during normal menstrual cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics. 2018; 35: 1–7.
[29]
Peregrin-Alvarez I, Fletcher NM, Saed GM, Roman RA, Detti L. Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) regulates BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene expression after ovarian cortex transplantation. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2021; 37: 349–352.
[30]
Ferraretti A, La Marca A, Fauser B, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Human Reproduction. 2011; 26: 1616–1624.
[31]
Grisendi V, Marca AL. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers. Minerva Ginecologica. 2017; 69: 250–258.
[32]
Mak JS, Lao TT. Assisted reproduction in hepatitis carrier couples. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020; 68: 103–108.
[33]
Hu X, Zhou X, Qian Y, Wu G, Ye Y, Zhu Y. The presence and expression of the hepatitis B virus in human oocytes and embryos. Human Reproduction. 2011; 26: 1860–1867.
[34]
Bu Z, Kong H, Li J, Wang F, Guo Y, Su Y, et al. Effect of male hepatitis B virus infection on outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment: insights from couples undergoing oocyte donation. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2014; 7: 1860–1866.
[35]
Jancar S, Crespo MS. Human diseases associated with tissue immune complex deposition. Trends in Immunology. 2005; 1: 48–55.
[36]
Zhang Z, Zhang JY, Wang LF, Wang FS. Immunopathogenesis and prognostic immune markers of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2012; 27: 223–230.
[37]
Dandri M, Locarnini S. New insight in the pathobiology of hepatitis B virus infection. Gut. 2012; 61: i6–i17.
[38]
Nie R, Jin L, Zhang H, Xu B, Chen W, Zhu G. Presence of hepatitis B virus in oocytes and embryos: a risk of hepatitis B virus transmission during in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 95: 1667–1671.
[39]
Huang T-H, Zhang Q-J, Xie Q-D, Zeng L-P, Zeng X-F. Presence and integration of HBV-DNA in mouse oocytes. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2005; 11: 2869–2873.
[40]
Ye F, Yue Y, Li S, Chen T, Bai G, Liu M, et al. Presence of HBsAg, HBcAg, and HBVDNA in ovary and ovum of the patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006; 194: 387–392.
[41]
Chen L-Z, Fan X-G, Gao J-M. Detection of HBsAg, HBcAg, and HBV-DNA in ovarian tissues from patients with HBV infection. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2005; 11: 5565–5567.
[42]
Cui AM, Cheng XY, Shao JG, Li HB, Wang XL, Shen Y, et al. Maternal hepatitis B virus carrier status and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016; 16: 87.
[43]
Liu Y, Jia A. Study on HBV-DNA content and variation of centromere of chromosome in spontaneous abortion women. Maternal and Child Health Care of China. 2010; 25: 2738–2740.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Share
Back to top