IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 37 / Issue 4 / pii/1630630921091-1763851619

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 46 Issue 1 (2019). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Open Access Original Research
Maximizing the benefits of screening mammography for women 40-49 years old
Show Less
1 Technological Institute of Athens, School of Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Obstetrics, Athens
2 Lito Hospital Department of Mastology, Athens
3 Ioannina University, Gynecology Department, Breast Unit, Ioannina
4 Aretaieio University Hospital, Gynecology Department, Athens (Greece)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 37(4), 278–282;
Published: 10 December 2010

Background: While women aged 50 and older are broadly considered to benefit from screening mammograms, the evidence of any similar advantages for younger women are still considered insufficient to form any substantial conclusions on the matter. The primary goal of this study was to examine whether or not the mortality rate of younger women is benefited by mammography, and if so, how can this beneficial effect be maximized. Methods: The authors have taken into account all available randomized control trials (RCTs) and have conducted a meta-analysis based on those RCTs to study the effect of mammography on the mortality rate of women younger than age 50. Further interpretation on various aspects of the results has also led to separate meta-analyses, with the RCTs included grouped in accordance to the mean time interval between screening mammograms employed by each study. The findings and conclusions of the comparison were used to calculate the number of mammograms necessary to reduce the absolute death risk, depending on the time interval between screening mammograms. Results: The meta-analysis indicated a reduction in breast-cancer mortality in the intervention group, which reached statistical significance (relative risk (RR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.71-0.93] p < 0.01). Furthermore, when the RCTs included were grouped according to their mean time interval between mammograms, there was a definite increase of statistical significance in favor of those RCTs with shorter interval times (RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.64-0.89] p < 0.01). Conclusions: The significant mortality rate reduction demonstrated by the meta-analytical results is a key indicator of the beneficial effect of mammography on the age group of women younger than 50. Additionally, the increase in the aforesaid significance when combining RCTs with short time intervals between mammograms, as opposed to those RCTs with longer intervals, suggests that the optimal use of mammographic screening lies with the former. This is better demonstrated when taking in account our approach to answering the practical question of “how many screening mammograms will take to save one life?” in correlation with the mean time interval involved.
Mammography before 50 years old
Screening mammography
Mammography in young women
Back to top