IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 37 / Issue 2 / pii/1630630020826-889076679

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Editorial
A practical approach to the prevention of miscarriage: part 3 – passive immunotherapy
Show Less
1 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 37(2), 81–83;
Published: 10 June 2010
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of passive immunotherapy in preventing miscarriage. Methods: Studies both pro and con concerning intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIG) in preventing miscarriage were evaluated. A new therapy of IV intralipid infusion is also reviewed. Results: Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy may be effective but it is necessary to use it prior to conception and monthly thereafter. Some brands are more potent than others. The data concerning intralipid IV infusion involves only small case series but the results from one study were encouraging though we could not personally substantiate these findings. Conclusions: Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is very expensive. In the author’s opinion there are no immunological studies that can determine if a woman needs immune suppression. The best way to decide is the history – the more miscarriages without any other identifiable cause the more likely passive immunotherapy may be helpful. If intralipid proves as efficacious as IVIG it will be a lot less expensive.
Keywords
Intravenous immunoglobulin
Intralipid infusion
Recurrent pregnancy loss
Natural killer cells
Share
Back to top