IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 35 / Issue 3 / pii/1630638709489-34824985

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Original Research
Improved pregnancy outcome for women with decreased ovarian oocyte reserve and advanced reproductive age by performing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
Show Less
1 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 35(3), 167–169;
Published: 10 September 2008
Abstract

Objective: To compare the pregnancy rates with IVF-ET vs non-assisted reproductive technology in women of more advanced reproductive age with decreased egg reserve as manifested by elevated day 3 serum FSH. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made in women aged ≥ 38 with a day 3 serum FSH of ≥ 15 mIU/mL with ≥ 1 year of infertility. Another inclusion criterion was three cycles (unless a pregnancy occurred before that time) of either IVF-ET or non-assisted reproductive therapy which as a minimum included luteal phase support with progesterone. Results: The clinical pregnancy rates in three cycles for non-IVF were 11.7% vs 27.2% for IVF. Delivery rates were 2.9% vs 15.1%. For ages 40-42 the clinical pregnancy rates were 37.5% vs 0.0% (p =0.02). Conclusions: Live deliveries are possible in women ≥ age 38 with marked decreased egg reserve. In vitro fertilization is more effective than non-IVF when follicle stimulation with gonadotropins is mild.
Keywords
Diminished egg reserve
In vitro fertilization
Minimal stimulation
FSH
Share
Back to top