IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 33 / Issue 3 / pii/2006034

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Editorial

The infertile male - Diagnosis

Show Less
1 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 33(3), 133–139;
Published: 10 September 2006
Abstract

Purpose: To discuss a variety of tests used to diagnose the subfertile male and to impart based on clinical experience, reading, and personal research, this editor's view of the relative value of these tests. Methods: The tests discussed include motile density, sperm morphology, the hypo-osmotic swelling test, antisperm antibodies, sperm chromatin structure assay, DNA integrity tests, reactive oxygen species, sperm penetration assay, sperm-zona pellucida binding tests, sperm creatine kinase activity, plasma membrane mannose-ligand receptor assay, and nuclear morphology. Results: Except when extremely low (<2.5 × 106/mL) motile density does not identify the subfertile male very well. In contrast to other studies, my group's data suggest that neither low normal morphology by WHO standards or strict criteria identify the subfertile male. The best predictor of male subfertility is the hypo-osmotic swelling test when it is <50%, which does not result in fer­tilization failure, but implantation failure. A high percentage of sperm coated by antisperm antibodies is very predictive of fertil­ization failure. Conclusions: The physician must be careful when concluding that the male is subfertile or fertile based on standard tests of con­centration, motility, and especially morphology.

Keywords
Semen analysis
Morphology
Motile density
Implantation defects
Share
Back to top