IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 23 / Issue 3 / pii/1996035

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Original Research

Comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy

Show Less
1 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, “Areteion” Hospital, Athens, Greece
2 Department of Cytology, and Cytogenetics “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996, 23(3), 161–167;
Published: 10 September 1996
Abstract

Background: To compare patient characteristics, diagnoses and complications asso­ciated with vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy in the last two decades. Study design: From 1974 to 1994, 6.420 women were included in the study. Complications were classified in two categories: intraoperative and postoperative, and psychosexual complications. Results: Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy experienced significantly fewer compli­cations than women who had undergone abdomimal hysterectomy. Vagina hysterectomy was asso­ciated with less febrile morbidity, bleeding requiring transfusion and convalescence than abdominal hysterectomy. Conclusions: Hysteretomy is highly effective for relief of symptoms associated with common non-malignant gynecologic conditions. There is a minimal risk of complications among women undergoing hysterectomy by the abdominal and vaginal route.

Keywords
Vaginal hysterectomy
Complications
Abdominal hysterectomy
Indication
Trends
Share
Back to top