IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 10 / Issue 4 / pii/1634257925974-636392989

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 46 Issue 1 (2019). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Open Access Original Research
Clinical staging versus operative staging in cervical cancer
Show Less
1 Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Padua (Italy)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 1983, 10(4), 201–204;
Published: 10 December 1983
Abstract

The Authors analyse the correlations between clinical staging (FIGO) and surgical staging in 152 patients affected by cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical therapy at the Gynecologic Institute of Padua University between 1974 and 1982. In the examined series clinical staging agrees with surgical staging in 2/3 of cases. The error percentage of clinical staging does not change significantly, from a statistical point of view, when staging varies. In those cases in which the two systems disagree the overstaging figure tends to decrease as staging becomes more severe while the clinical understaging figure tends to increase accordingly. On the basis of these results the Authors advocate a rational resort to operative staging in cervical cancer so as to evaluate the real topography of the original focus more accurately and plan the most adequate treatment.
Share
Back to top